Literature DB >> 31265136

Evaluation of associations between genetically predicted circulating protein biomarkers and breast cancer risk.

Xiang Shu1, Jiandong Bao1, Lang Wu1, Jirong Long1, Xiao-Ou Shu1, Xingyi Guo1, Yaohua Yang1, Kyriaki Michailidou2,3, Manjeet K Bolla2, Qin Wang2, Joe Dennis2, Irene L Andrulis4,5, Jose E Castelao6, Thilo Dörk7, Manuela Gago-Dominguez8,9, Montserrat García-Closas10, Graham G Giles11,12, Artitaya Lophatananon13,14, Kenneth Muir13,14, Håkan Olsson15, Gadi Rennert16, Emmanouil Saloustros17, Rodney J Scott18,19, Melissa C Southey20, Paul D P Pharoah2,21, Roger L Milne11,12, Peter Kraft22,23, Jacques Simard24, Douglas F Easton2,21, Wei Zheng1.   

Abstract

A small number of circulating proteins have been reported to be associated with breast cancer risk, with inconsistent results. Herein, we attempted to identify novel protein biomarkers for breast cancer via the integration of genomics and proteomics data. In the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), with 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European descendants, we evaluated the associations of the genetically predicted concentrations of >1,400 circulating proteins with breast cancer risk. We used data from a large-scale protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) analysis as our study instrument. Summary statistics for these pQTL variants related to breast cancer risk were obtained from the BCAC and used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for each protein using the inverse-variance weighted method. We identified 56 proteins significantly associated with breast cancer risk by instrumental analysis (false discovery rate <0.05). Of these, the concentrations of 32 were influenced by variants close to a breast cancer susceptibility locus (ABO, 9q34.2). Many of these proteins, such as insulin receptor, insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 and other membrane receptors (OR: 0.82-1.18, p values: 6.96 × 10-4 -3.28 × 10-8 ), are linked to insulin resistance and estrogen receptor signaling pathways. Proteins identified at other loci include those involved in biological processes such as alcohol and lipid metabolism, proteolysis, apoptosis, immune regulation and cell motility and proliferation. Consistent associations were observed for 22 proteins in the UK Biobank data (p < 0.05). The study identifies potential novel biomarkers for breast cancer, but further investigation is needed to replicate our findings.
© 2019 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; circulating protein biomarkers; genetics; instruments

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31265136     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of Over 140,000 European Descendants Identifies Genetically Predicted Blood Protein Biomarkers Associated with Prostate Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Lang Wu; Xiang Shu; Jiandong Bao; Xingyi Guo; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Christopher A Haiman; Rosalind A Eeles; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Associations between circulating proteins and risk of breast cancer by intrinsic subtypes: a Mendelian randomisation analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Shu; Qin Zhou; Xiaohui Sun; Michelle Flesaker; Xingyi Guo; Jirong Long; Mark E Robson; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 9.075

3.  Associations between Genetically Predicted Circulating Protein Concentrations and Endometrial Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhu; Tracy A O'Mara; Duo Liu; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Dylan Glubb; Amanda B Spurdle; Peter A Fasching; Diether Lambrechts; Daniel Buchanan; Pik Fang Kho; Linda S Cook; Christine Friedenreich; James V Lacey; Chu Chen; Nicolas Wentzensen; Immaculata De Vivo; Yan Sun; Jirong Long; Mengmeng Du; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng; Lang Wu; Herbert Yu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Associations between Genetically Predicted Blood Protein Biomarkers and Pancreatic Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhu; Xiang Shu; Xingyi Guo; Duo Liu; Jiandong Bao; Roger L Milne; Graham G Giles; Chong Wu; Mengmeng Du; Emily White; Harvey A Risch; Nuria Malats; Eric J Duell; Phyllis J Goodman; Donghui Li; Paige Bracci; Verena Katzke; Rachel E Neale; Steven Gallinger; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Alan A Arslan; Federico Canzian; Charles Kooperberg; Laura E Beane Freeman; Ghislaine Scelo; Kala Visvanathan; Christopher A Haiman; Loïc Le Marchand; Herbert Yu; Gloria M Petersen; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon; Alison P Klein; Qiuyin Cai; Jirong Long; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng; Lang Wu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.090

5.  Cross-cancer evaluation of polygenic risk scores for 16 cancer types in two large cohorts.

Authors:  Rebecca E Graff; Taylor B Cavazos; Khanh K Thai; Linda Kachuri; Sara R Rashkin; Joshua D Hoffman; Stacey E Alexeeff; Maruta Blatchins; Travis J Meyers; Lancelote Leong; Caroline G Tai; Nima C Emami; Douglas A Corley; Lawrence H Kushi; Elad Ziv; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Eric Jorgenson; Thomas J Hoffmann; Laurel A Habel; John S Witte; Lori C Sakoda
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.