Literature DB >> 31265100

Effect of Tanezumab on Joint Pain, Physical Function, and Patient Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis Among Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Thomas J Schnitzer1, Richard Easton2, Shirley Pang3, Dennis J Levinson4, Glenn Pixton5, Lars Viktrup6, Isabelle Davignon7, Mark T Brown7, Christine R West7, Kenneth M Verburg7.   

Abstract

Importance: Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) may remain symptomatic with traditional OA treatments. Objective: To assess 2 subcutaneous tanezumab dosing regimens for OA. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial from January 2016 to May 14, 2018 (last patient visit). Patients enrolled were 18 years or older with hip or knee OA, inadequate response to OA analgesics, and no radiographic evidence of prespecified joint safety conditions. Interventions: Patients received by subcutaneous administration either tanezumab, 2.5 mg, at day 1 and week 8 (n = 231); tanezumab, 2.5 mg at day 1 and 5 mg at week 8 (ie, tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg; n = 233); or placebo at day 1 and week 8 (n = 232). Main Outcomes and Measures: Co-primary end points were change from baseline to week 16 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain (0-10, no to extreme pain), WOMAC Physical Function (0-10, no to extreme difficulty), and patient global assessment of osteoarthritis (PGA-OA) (1-5, very good to very poor) scores.
Results: Among 698 patients randomized, 696 received 1 or more treatment doses (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [9.6] years; 65.1% women), and 582 (83.6%) completed the trial. From baseline to 16 weeks, mean WOMAC Pain scores decreased from 7.1 to 3.6 in the tanezumab, 2.5 mg, group; 7.3 to 3.6 in the tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg, group; and 7.3 to 4.4 in the placebo group (least squares mean differences [95% CI] vs placebo were -0.60 [-1.07 to -0.13; P = .01] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.73 [-1.20 to -0.26; P = .002] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Mean WOMAC Physical Function scores decreased from 7.2 to 3.7 in the 2.5-mg group, 7.4 to 3.6 in the 2.5/5-mg group, and 7.4 to 4.5 with placebo (differences vs placebo, -0.66 [-1.14 to -0.19; P = .007] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.89 [-1.37 to -0.42; P < .001] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Mean PGA-OA scores decreased from 3.4 to 2.4 in the 2.5-mg group, 3.5 to 2.4 in the 2.5/5-mg group, and 3.5 to 2.7 with placebo (differences vs placebo, -0.22 [-0.39 to -0.05; P = .01] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.25 [-0.41 to -0.08; P = .004] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Rapidly progressive OA occurred only in tanezumab-treated patients (2.5 mg: n = 5, 2.2%; 2.5/5 mg: n = 1, 0.4%). The incidence of total joint replacements was 8 (3.5%), 16 (6.9%), and 4 (1.7%) in the tanezumab, 2.5 mg; tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg; and placebo groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate to severe OA of the knee or hip and inadequate response to standard analgesics, tanezumab, compared with placebo, resulted in statistically significant improvements in scores assessing pain and physical function, and in PGA-OA, although the improvements were modest and tanezumab-treated patients had more joint safety events and total joint replacements. Further research is needed to determine the clinical importance of these efficacy and adverse event findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697773.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31265100      PMCID: PMC6613301          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.8044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  45 in total

1.  A tale of two TrkA inhibitor trials: same target, divergent results.

Authors:  D A Walsh; T Neogi
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 2.  Design and conduct of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials.

Authors:  Nathaniel Katz
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 3.  Targeting neurotrophic factors: Novel approaches to musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Malfait; Rachel E Miller; Joel A Block
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 4.  The evolution of nerve growth factor inhibition in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Barton L Wise; Matthias F Seidel; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of tanezumab administered as a fixed dosing regimen in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled phase III trials.

Authors:  Jian-Xiong Ma; Zheng-Rui Fan; Ying Wang; Heng-Ting Chen; Shuang Lang; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Phenotypes of osteoarthritis: current state and future implications.

Authors:  Leticia A Deveza; Amanda E Nelson; Richard F Loeser
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.473

7.  Knee osteonecrosis incidence from two real-world data sources.

Authors:  Jean W Liew; Seoyoung C Kim; Christine Peloquin; David T Felson; Yinzhu Jin; Joyce Lii; Tuhina Neogi
Journal:  Osteoarthr Cartil Open       Date:  2021-04-16

8.  Prevalence of Undiagnosed Subchondral Insufficiency Fractures of the Knee in Middle Age Adults with Knee Pain and Suspected Meniscal Tear.

Authors:  Jamie L Huizinga; Nehal Shah; Stacy E Smith; Anthony Notino; Melissa A Kluczynski; Kelly Jordan; Leslie J Bisson; Antonia F Chen; Faith Selzer; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Osteoarthr Cartil Open       Date:  2020-08-19

9.  An update on targets for treating osteoarthritis pain: NGF and TRPV1.

Authors:  Alia M Obeidat; Anita Donner; Rachel E Miller
Journal:  Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 10.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Kaetlyn R Arant; Richard F Loeser
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.