Literature DB >> 31264773

The ARRIVE Trial: Interpretation from an Epidemiologic Perspective.

Suzan L Carmichael1, Jonathan M Snowden2,3.   

Abstract

The findings of the ARRIVE trial (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) were recently published. This multisite randomized trial was designed to provide evidence regarding whether labor induction or expectant management is associated with increased adverse perinatal outcomes and risk of cesarean birth among healthy nulliparous women at term. The trial reported that the primary outcome, a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes, was not significantly different between the 2 groups; the principal secondary outcome, cesarean birth, was significantly more common among women whose pregnancy was expectantly managed than among women whose labor was induced at 39 weeks. These results have the potential to change existing practice. Several aspects of the study design may influence its potential internal and external validity and should be considered in order to make sound causal inferences from this trial, which will in turn affect how its findings are translated to practice. Although chance and confounding are of minimal concern, given the sample size and randomization used in the study, selection bias may be a concern. Studies are vulnerable to selection bias when the sample population differs from eligible nonparticipants, including in randomized controlled trials. External validity is defined as the extent to which the study population and setting are representative of the larger source population the study intends to represent. External validity may be limited given the characteristics of the women enrolled in the ARRIVE trial and the practice settings where the study was conducted. This brief report provides concrete suggestions for further analyses that could help solidify conclusions from the trial, and for further research questions that will continue advancement toward answering this complex question of how best to manage labor and birth decisions at full term among low-risk women.
© 2019 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causality; cesarean; induction of labor; labor onset; pragmatic randomized controlled trials; randomized controlled trials

Year:  2019        PMID: 31264773      PMCID: PMC6821557          DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  36 in total

1.  Lessons from complex interventions to improve health.

Authors:  Penelope Hawe
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Uptake and Utilization of Practice Guidelines in Hospitals in the United States: the Case of Routine Episiotomy.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Cori J Blauer-Peterson; Neel T Shah; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-10-13

3.  Assessing the Value of the ARRIVE Trial for Clinical Practice: Sea Change or Just a Splash?

Authors:  Julia C Phillippi; Tekoa L King
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Defining failed induction of labor.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Yinglei Lai; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  SMFM Statement on Elective Induction of Labor in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women at Term: the ARRIVE Trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Obesity treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in primary care practice.

Authors:  Gary G Bennett; Erica T Warner; Russell E Glasgow; Sandy Askew; Julie Goldman; Debra P Ritzwoller; Karen M Emmons; Bernard A Rosner; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-12

Review 7.  Committee Opinion No. 687: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Anjali J Kaimal; Jonathan M Snowden; James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Perinatal outcomes in low-risk term pregnancies: do they differ by week of gestation?

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; James M Nicholson; Sanae Nakagawa; Tim A Bruckner; A Eugene Washington; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Unbiased research and the human spirit: the challenges of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  K F Schulz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  3 in total

1.  Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Cesarean Birth and Maternal Morbidity in a Low-Risk, Nulliparous Cohort.

Authors:  Michelle P Debbink; Lynda G Ugwu; William A Grobman; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; John M Thorp; Suneet P Chauhan; Maged M Costantine; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Improving the external validity of Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial findings.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hutcheon; Jessica Liauw
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.103

3.  Factors Associated with Unplanned Primary Cesarean Birth: Secondary Analysis of the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.

Authors:  Carol Sakala; Candice Belanoff; Eugene R Declercq
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.