| Literature DB >> 31263579 |
Laura Dean1, Angela Obasi1, Asma El Sony2, Selma Fadul2, Hanaa El Hassan2, Rachael Thomson3, Rachel Tolhurst1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Child marriage is a fundamental development challenge for women and girls, with significant negative health and social outcomes. Sudan has a high rate of child marriage, with 34% of women aged 20-24 married before their 18th birthday. Since limited preventive interventions exist, we aimed to inform the evidence base to strengthen strategic action, using mixed qualitative methods to enhance study credibility. This study is the first to conduct a rigorous qualitative examination of the drivers of child marriage from the perspective of key stakeholders involved in marriage decision making within Sudan, and makes a significant contribution towards global knowledge by developing an evidence-based conceptual framework.Entities:
Keywords: child health; qualitative study
Year: 2019 PMID: 31263579 PMCID: PMC6570976 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Glob Health ISSN: 2059-7908
Figure 1Phased study design. FGD, focus group discussion.
Study site characteristics
| Population | Primary school | Nearest high secondary school (vehicle, dry season) (min) | Formally trained midwife | Healthcare worker | Distance to Primary Health Care (PHC) (vehicle, dry season) (min) | Distance comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) (vehicle, dry season) | Key ethnic groups | |
| Study site 1 | 4300 | Yes | 10 | Yes | Medical assistant | NA | 20 min | Khawalda |
| Study site 2 | 3750 | Yes | 15 | No | No | 15 | 45 min | Kawahla and Ga’leeyen |
| Study site 3 | 3250 | Yes | 30 | No (traditional midwife) | Retired nurse | 30 | 1 hour | Kawahla and Ga’leeyen |
| Study site 4 | 1415 | Yes | 10 | Yes | Nurse | 45 | 45 min | Kawahla, Ga’leeyen, Shukreya and Bataheen |
NA, not available.
Marriage case study participant details
| Type of respondent*† | Approximate age at interview‡ | Approximate age at marriage‡ | Occupation | Educational level | |
| Study site 1 (SS1) | |||||
| Case study 1 (CS1) | MAG | 18 | 15 | Housewife | Primary |
| Groom | 25 | 22 | Builder | Primary | |
| MoB | Unknown | Housewife | Primary | ||
| FoB | 35 | Builder | Primary | ||
| MoG | Unknown | Farmer | Primary | ||
| FoG | 54 | Farmer | Primary | ||
| Study site 2 (SS2) | |||||
| Case study 2 (CS2) | MAG | 20 | 18 | University student | University |
| Groom | 28 | 26 | Farmer and trader | University | |
| MoB | 50 | Housewife | No education | ||
| FoB | 58 | Driver | No education | ||
| MoG | 45 | Housewife | No education | ||
| FoG | 56 | Farmer and trader | Primary | ||
| Case study 3 (CS3) | MAG | 21 | 18 | Housewife | Secondary |
| Groom | 27 | 24 | Trader | Secondary | |
| MoB | 45 | Housewife | No education | ||
| FoB | 50 | Bed maker | Primary | ||
| MoG | 45 | Housewife | No education | ||
| FoG | 59 | Trader | Primary | ||
| Case study 4 (CS4) | MAG | 20 | 18 | Housewife | University |
| Study site 3 (SS3) | |||||
| Case study 5 (CS5) | MAG | 18 | 18 | Housewife | Secondary |
| Groom | 27 | 27 | Animal farmer | Primary | |
| MoB | 43 | Housewife | No education | ||
| FoB | 53 | Farmer | No education | ||
| MoG | 48 | Housewife | No education | ||
| Case study 6 (CS6) | MAG | 18 | 17 | Housewife | Primary school |
| Groom | 27 | 26 | Farmer | Primary school | |
| MoB | 40 | Housewife | Primary school | ||
| FoB | 46 | Shepherd | Primary school | ||
| MoG | 55 | Housewife | No education | ||
| FoG | 70 | Farmer | No education | ||
| Study site 4 (SS4) | |||||
| Case study 7 (CS7) | MAG | 18 | 17 | Housewife | Primary |
| Groom | 26 | 25 | Layman | Primary | |
| MoB | 45 | Housewife | No education | ||
| FoB | 45 | Builder | Primary | ||
| Case study 8 (CS8) | MAG | 16 | 15 | Housewife | Primary |
| Groom | 25 | 24 | Merchant | Secondary | |
| MoB | 45 | Housewife | No education | ||
| FoB | 50 | Village health assistant | Primary | ||
| Case study 9 (CS9) | MAG | 15 | 14 | Housewife | Primary |
| Groom | 26 | 25 | Shopkeeper | Secondary | |
| MoB | 45 | Housewife | No education | ||
| Case study 10 (CS10) | MAG | 15 | 14 | Housewife | Primary |
| Groom | 23 | 22 | Shopkeeper | Secondary | |
| MoB | 25 | Housewife | Primary | ||
| Case study 11 (CS11) | MAG | 18 | 16 | Housewife | Primary |
| Groom | 25 | 23 | Trader | Secondary | |
*Type of respondent acronyms as follows: married adolescent girl (MAG), groom, mother of bride (MoB), father of bride (FoB), mother of groom (MoG) and father of groom (FoG).
†Where expected participants are missing from case studies, participants were either deceased, not living in study communities or refused to take part in the study.
‡Ages represented may not be accurate as participants were often unaware of their age and so gave an approximation. This was common across all participants.
Figure 2Example illustration from dissemination: limited autonomy and decision-making influence of girls and women.
Figure 3Conceptual framework for drivers of child marriage in Sudan.