Shabana Humayon1, Maria S Altieri2, Jie Yang3, Lizhou Nie4, Konstantinos Spaniolas2, Aurora D Pryor2. 1. Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York. Electronic address: Shabana.humayon@stonybrookmedicine.edu. 2. Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York. 3. Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York. 4. Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States the percentage of adolescents with obesity has reached an alarming level of 21%. Bariatric surgery has emerged as a successful intervention in the weight loss for adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To compare bariatric procedures performed in adolescent and adult populations. SETTING: University Hospital, United States. METHODS: Using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database, records from the adolescent (age 12-21years) and adult populations undergoing bariatric surgery during 2005-2014 were examined. Patients' demographics, surgery type (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB), length of stay (LOS), complications and comorbidities were analyzed. RESULTS: The annual adolescent bariatric cases increased from 150 in 2005 to 406 in 2014. In the adolescent population, increasing utilization trends were noted in the Hispanic population (RR=1.08, p-value<0.0001), use of Public (Medicaid or Medicare) insurance (RR=1.10, p-value=0.0003) and SG procedures (RR= 1.56, p-value <0.0001). Decreasing trends were noted in the Caucasian population (RR=0.95, p-value<0.0001), RYGB (RR=0.92, p-value<0.0001) and LAGB (RR= 0.84, p-value=0.0001). Adolescents undergoing bariatric surgery had fewer comorbidities (55.4% vs 81.1%, p-value<0.0001), experienced fewer complications (3.3% vs 4.9%, p-value<0.0001) and 30-day readmissions (3.8% vs 5.0%, p-value=0.0029). Length of stay was also found to be significantly shorter for the adolescent population (1.73 vs 2.00 days, p-value<0.0001). After adjusting for other confounding factors, adolescent patients still had significantly lower complication risk (p-value=0.01) and shorter length of stay (p-value=0.0005) than adults. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery procedure rates have increased in the adolescent population with increasing trend of using LSG. The data from our study supports that bariatric surgery is safe in adolescents with significantly lower complication risk and shorter length of stay as compared to the adult population.
BACKGROUND: In the United States the percentage of adolescents with obesity has reached an alarming level of 21%. Bariatric surgery has emerged as a successful intervention in the weight loss for adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To compare bariatric procedures performed in adolescent and adult populations. SETTING: University Hospital, United States. METHODS: Using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database, records from the adolescent (age 12-21years) and adult populations undergoing bariatric surgery during 2005-2014 were examined. Patients' demographics, surgery type (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB), length of stay (LOS), complications and comorbidities were analyzed. RESULTS: The annual adolescent bariatric cases increased from 150 in 2005 to 406 in 2014. In the adolescent population, increasing utilization trends were noted in the Hispanic population (RR=1.08, p-value<0.0001), use of Public (Medicaid or Medicare) insurance (RR=1.10, p-value=0.0003) and SG procedures (RR= 1.56, p-value <0.0001). Decreasing trends were noted in the Caucasian population (RR=0.95, p-value<0.0001), RYGB (RR=0.92, p-value<0.0001) and LAGB (RR= 0.84, p-value=0.0001). Adolescents undergoing bariatric surgery had fewer comorbidities (55.4% vs 81.1%, p-value<0.0001), experienced fewer complications (3.3% vs 4.9%, p-value<0.0001) and 30-day readmissions (3.8% vs 5.0%, p-value=0.0029). Length of stay was also found to be significantly shorter for the adolescent population (1.73 vs 2.00 days, p-value<0.0001). After adjusting for other confounding factors, adolescent patients still had significantly lower complication risk (p-value=0.01) and shorter length of stay (p-value=0.0005) than adults. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery procedure rates have increased in the adolescent population with increasing trend of using LSG. The data from our study supports that bariatric surgery is safe in adolescents with significantly lower complication risk and shorter length of stay as compared to the adult population.
Authors: Paul H McClelland; Krystyna Kabata; Wojciech Gorecki; Antalya Jano; Michael E Zenilman; Piotr Gorecki Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-07-25 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Madhusmita Misra; Vibha Singhal; Brian Carmine; Amita Bose; Megan M Kelsey; Fatima Cody Stanford; Jennifer Bram; Jeremy Aidlen; Thomas Inge; Mary L Bouxsein; Miriam A Bredella Journal: Bone Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 4.398