Literature DB >> 31261209

Prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fracture among community-dwelling elderly in Shanghai.

Chao Gao1, Yang Xu1, Li Li1, Wen-Qin Gu2, Chun-Tao Yi2, Qiong Zhu3, Hong-An Gu3, Bi-Hua Chen4, Qing-Qing Wang4, Feng Tang5, Ju-Liang Xu5, Jian-Miao Hou6, Hui-Jiang Song6, Hui Wang7, Zhi-Liang Wang7, Zhen-Lin Zhang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31261209      PMCID: PMC6759100          DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Osteoporosis is becoming a common, serious, and costly health problem, which causes over nine million fractures annually worldwide.[ Currently, osteoporotic fractures are a considerable burden to public health services and have fairly high morbidity and mortality.[ Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture and may lead to a high risk of further fracture and could be prevalent in both females and males.[ Ling et al[ and Ms. OS studies[ evaluated the prevalence of vertebral fractures in Beijing and Hong Kong, respectively. However, our knowledge of the descriptive epidemiology and risk factors for vertebral fracture in China still remains poor. In this cross-sectional study, 14,075 participants including 6313 males (aged 60–97 years) and 7762 females (aged 60–98 years), were gathered voluntarily through the SCEHE (Shanghai Community-dwelling Elderly Health Examination) by family doctors in six communities all over Shanghai from 2014 to 2016. The six communities were Fenglin, Lingyun, Longhua, Qixian, Sanlin, and Xujiahui. All the participants were contacted by the staffs in the community to attend the physical examinations. The common physical examinations did not include the X-ray examination targeted to the thoracic and lumbar spine (T4-L4). We informed the participants who were willing to undergo the X-ray examination of the related risks, and they signed a consent form. The agreed participants were requested to provide us relevant information consisting of characteristics, chronic disease history, and for females, age at menopause. After that, lateral thoracolumbar (T4-L4) X-ray radiography was taken. All the radiographs and the medical history information were collected to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital together. The semi-quantitative system by Genant et al[ was adapted for grading vertebral deformities by the same experienced radiologist within 3 months. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Human Research of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital. Basic information such as age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) was obtained. Years since menopause (YSM) were defined as the time since menopause began and at least 1 year. The radiograph was taken in the respective Community Health Service Center (CHSC), and the same protocol was adapted in each CHSC. A radiograph was taken with the patient in the left lateral position and was centered at T10. All participants underwent only one radiograph of the thoracic and lumbar spine to limit radiation exposure and due to workforce and financial limitations. In total, 99% of the radiographs covered T10-L2, over 95% of the radiographs covered T8-L3, and over 92% of the radiographs covered T6-L4. All X-ray images were stored and brought to the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital. An experienced professor of semi-quantitative techniques analyzed the radiographs and separated them into fractured and non-fractured groups. Fasting blood samples included routine blood examinations (mainly hemoglobin), hepatic function (mainly alanine transaminase), renal function (mainly serum creatinine), serum lipids (mainly serum cholesterol), and fasting blood glucose. Measurements were taken at each CHSC clinical lab using different biochemistry systems, so we only adopted a qualitative comparison for disease diagnosis, not for quantitative comparison or data analysis. In this study, we collected 11 characteristics of all participants: age, BMI, YSM for females, and disease history including hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, hyperlipidemia, chronic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, and malignant tumor. Statistics were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and according to the semi-quantitative technique of Genant, deformities greater than or equal to grade 1 were considered fractured. The characteristics of the fractured participants were compared with non-fractured participants within the same sex, using t tests for continuous variables and Chi-squared analysis for categorical data. All statistical tests were two sided. Normally distributed data, such as age, weight, and height, are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and a P value <0.05 was considered statistical significant. We successfully collected 14,075 X-ray images and 9239 disease histories. The participants recruited for statistical analysis were separated into stratified age groups with 5-year intervals and divided into two different cohorts according to fractured or non-fractured. The basic anthropometry of the 14,075 participants and the chronic disease history for 9239 participants were summarized in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. The characteristics of the two cohorts are stated in Supplementary Table 3. The male fractured cohort were more likely to be older (72.1 vs. 71.2 years, P < 0.001) and shorter (165.2 vs. 166.3 cm, P < 0.001) and less weight (66.5 vs. 67.4 kg, P = 0.002) when compared to the non-fractured cohort. The fractured cohort had a lower rate of diabetes (12.8 vs. 16.5%, P = 0.025) and a higher rate of stroke (5.5 vs. 3.7%, P = 0.034) than the non-fractured cohort. In addition, similar results were presented in the female fractured cohort, which was older (74.2 vs. 70.9 years, P < 0.001) and shorter (152.2 vs. 154.5 cm, P < 0.001) and less weight (56.5 vs. 57.9 kg, P < 0.001); the fractured cohort had a higher rate of hypertension (41.2 vs. 37.5%, P = 0.011) than the non-fractured cohort. Vertebrae of T4-L4 were analyzed in lateral radiographs of spine using the semi-quantitative technique. The prevalence of vertebral fracture was 17.2% (2414/14,075) among all participants, 17.0% (1073/6313) for males, and 17.3% (1341/7762) for females [details in Supplementary Table 4]. The vertebral fracture prevalence of females had a tendency to be higher with increasing age. While males had a relatively stable prevalence, at approximately 18% and was significantly higher than females in 60 to 64 years and 65 to 69 years group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), while the prevalence among females was significantly higher in the groups of 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and over 85 years (P = 0.041, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). The prevalence among 70 to 74 years females was higher than that in males (18.1% vs. 17.2%) with no statistical significance (P = 0.512). Figure 1 shows a more direct tendency of the prevalence in different sex and age groups. The grades of the vertebral fracture were evaluated by a semi-quantitative technique, with three different grades: mild, grade 1 (G1); moderate, grade 2 (G2), or severe, grade (G3). The prevalence of G2 and G3 fracture in females was significantly higher than in males in all age groups (P < 0.001), except for the 60 to 64 years group (P = 0.313). Supplementary Table 5) shows the prevalence of G2 and G3 fractures among Shanghai community-dwelling elders.
Figure 1

Prevalence of vertebral fracture among Shanghai community-dwelling elderly for males and females in different age groups.

Prevalence of vertebral fracture among Shanghai community-dwelling elderly for males and females in different age groups. Among the participants, 2414 individuals suffered 3814 fractured vertebral bodies, indicating that each participant with fracture had 1.58 deformed vertebral bodies. The relative percentages of G1, G2, and G3 fractures among the fractured elderly were 68.2% (2601/3814), 21.4% (816/3814), and 10.4% (397/3814), respectively. Supplementary Figure 1, presents the prevalence of different deformity grades among males and females in our study. Supplementary Figures 2 and 3, show a view of the deformity grades of each vertebral body. The most easily affected vertebrae bodies were T11, T12, and L1 [Supplementary Figure 5]. Nearly 75% of the fractures occurred at T11, T12, and L1 both in males and females. Most vertebral fractures were single, and females had a higher prevalence of single vertebral fractures than males (67.8% vs. 60.7%, P < 0.001). However, double vertebral fractures had a higher percentage among fractured males than females (28.6% vs. 20.7%, P < 0.001) [Supplementary Figure 4]. No significant statistical difference was found when comparing multiple (three or more) vertebral fractures between males and females (10.6% vs. 11.5%). The prevalence of thoracic-lumbar fracture (in which the fracture occurred in both thoracic and lumbar vertebrae), single thoracic vertebral fracture, and single lumbar vertebral fracture were 17.8%, 55.3%, and 26.9% in males and 18.0%, 48.0%, and 34.0% in females. Males were at greater risk of thoracic fracture than females (P < 0.001), whereas females had greater prevalence of lumbar fracture than males (P < 0.001). The prevalence of vertebral fracture in post-menopausal females in Shanghai was relatively lower than that in Beijing among all age group according to a recent study[: 11.1% vs. 22.6% among 60 to 69 years group, 20.0% vs. 31.4% among 70 to 79 years group, and 30.1% vs. 58.1% among older than 80 years group, respectively. Similarly, the prevalence among males in Shanghai was also lower than that in Hong Kong,[ which also focused on community-dwelling males using the same method, with 14.4% vs. 15.2% in the 65 to 69 years group, 17.9% vs. 19.9% in the 70 to 79 years group, and 19.8% vs. 35.9% in aged older than 80 years, respectively. The prevalence of vertebral fracture increased with age in females, and this age-specific prevalence has been reported in many cities or countries[; however, previous studies found no correlation between aging and vertebral fracture in males.[ The prevalence was stable for each age group in males, and no significant difference was found except for the age groups of 65 to 69 years and over 85 years. Meanwhile, we found that 83.3% of fractures among males were G1 and occurred at T11 or T12, while 43.3% of fractures among females were G2 or G3 and occurred at T12 or L1. Males have a higher bone mineral density (BMD) than females, and reduced BMD of the total hip and femoral neck is associated with increased odds of having a prevalent vertebral fracture,[ which may explain the difference in fracture grade between males and females. In conclusion, the prevalence of vertebral fracture among the elderly in Shanghai was 17.2% for all, 17.0% for males, and 17.3% for females. Males were at greater risk of mild, thoracic, and double vertebral fracture, while females were more likely to be moderate or severe, lumbar, and single onset. The prevalence among females increased with age, while was not seen in males.

Funding

The study was supported by the grants from Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai municipality (No. 16411954500) and the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2014CB942900).

Conflicts of interest

None.
  10 in total

1.  Vertebral fractures in Beijing, China: the Beijing Osteoporosis Project.

Authors:  X Ling; S R Cummings; Q Mingwei; Z Xihe; C Xioashu; M Nevitt; K Stone
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Spine fracture prevalence in a nationally representative sample of US women and men aged ≥40 years: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014---supplementary presentation.

Authors:  F Cosman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prevalence and risk factors of radiographic vertebral fractures in elderly Chinese men and women: results of Mr. OS (Hong Kong) and Ms. OS (Hong Kong) studies.

Authors:  A W L Kwok; J-S Gong; Y-X J Wang; J C S Leung; T Kwok; J F Griffith; P C Leung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Excess mortality or institutionalization after hip fracture: men are at greater risk than women.

Authors:  Marlene Fransen; Mark Woodward; Robyn Norton; Elizabeth Robinson; Meg Butler; A John Campbell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  Osteoporosis: impact on health and economics.

Authors:  Nicholas Harvey; Elaine Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Vertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women: a population-based study.

Authors:  L Cui; L Chen; W Xia; Y Jiang; L Cui; W Huang; W Wang; X Wang; Y Pei; X Zheng; Q Wang; Z Ning; M Li; O Wang; X Xing; Q Lin; W Yu; X Weng; L Xu; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The prevalence of and risk factors for radiographic vertebral fractures in older Indian women and men: Delhi Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (DeVOS).

Authors:  Raman K Marwaha; Nikhil Tandon; Yashdeep Gupta; Kuntal Bhadra; Archana Narang; Kalaivani Mani; Ambrish Mithal; Subhash Kukreja
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Prevalent vertebral fractures in black women and white women.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Lisa Palermo; Molly Vogt; Kristine E Ensrud; Susan Ewing; Marc Hochberg; Michael C Nevitt; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-11-19
  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Association of HIVEP3 Gene and Lnc RNA with Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Content and Hip Geometry by Genome-Wide Association Analysis in Chinese People.

Authors:  Weiwei Hu; Jinwei He; Luyue Qi; Chun Wang; Hua Yue; Jiemei Gu; Hao Zhang; Yi Wang; Zhenlin Zhang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.257

2.  Health-related quality of life in men with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Wenbing Zheng; Dichen Zhao; Lei Sun; Bingna Zhou; Jiayi Liu; Ou Wang; Yan Jiang; Weibo Xia; Xiaoping Xing; Mei Li
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Exploring the Relationship of Bone Turnover Markers and Bone Mineral Density in Community-Dwelling Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Xu Wei; Yili Zhang; Xinghua Xiang; Menghua Sun; Kai Sun; Tao Han; Baoyu Qi; Yanming Xie; Ranxing Zhang; Liguo Zhu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Fracture in China: The China Osteoporosis Prevalence Study.

Authors:  Linhong Wang; Wei Yu; Xiangjun Yin; Lijia Cui; Shunyu Tang; Ning Jiang; Lu Cui; Nan Zhao; Qiang Lin; Lin Chen; Hua Lin; Xiaolan Jin; Zhong Dong; Zeping Ren; Zhulin Hou; Yongqing Zhang; Jieming Zhong; Shunxiang Cai; Yuan Liu; Ruilin Meng; Ying Deng; Xianbin Ding; Jingang Ma; Zhongjian Xie; Lin Shen; Wen Wu; Mengmeng Zhang; Qifeng Ying; Yuhong Zeng; Jin Dong; Steven R Cummings; Zhixin Li; Weibo Xia
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02

5.  PFN1 Gene Polymorphisms and the Bone Mineral Density Response to Alendronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Chinese Women with Low Bone Mass.

Authors:  Jiao Zhao; Li Liu; Shanshan Lv; Chun Wang; Hua Yue; Zhenlin Zhang
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  Deep-learning image reconstruction for image quality evaluation and accurate bone mineral density measurement on quantitative CT: A phantom-patient study.

Authors:  Yali Li; Yaojun Jiang; Xi Yu; Binbin Ren; Chunyu Wang; Sihui Chen; Duoshan Ma; Danyang Su; Huilong Liu; Xiangyang Ren; Xiaopeng Yang; Jianbo Gao; Yan Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.055

7.  Efficacy of generic teriparatide and alendronate in Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Mei Li; Zhenlin Zhang; Qingyun Xue; Qifu Li; Xiaolan Jin; Jin Dong; Qun Cheng; Li You; Hua Lin; Hai Tang; Lin Shen; Xin Gao; Ji Hu; Aijun Chao; Pengqiu Li; Rui Shi; Shuhui Zheng; Ying Zhang; Xiaojiang Xiong; Wei Yu; Weibo Xia
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.879

8.  Prevalent vertebral fractures among urban-dwelling Chinese postmenopausal women: a population-based, randomized-sampling, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Weibo Xia; Qiang Liu; Jinhan Lv; Zhenlin Zhang; Wen Wu; Zhongjian Xie; Jianting Chen; Liang He; Jian Dong; Zhenming Hu; Qiang Lin; Wei Yu; Fang Wei; Jue Wang
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.879

9.  The Assessment of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians and Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound in Identifying Osteoporotic Fractures and Falls Among Chinese People.

Authors:  Chao Gao; Huijiang Song; Bihua Chen; Zhenlin Zhang; Hua Yue
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Opportunistic Screening Using Low-Dose CT and the Prevalence of Osteoporosis in China: A Nationwide, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Cheng; Kaiping Zhao; Xiaojuan Zha; Xia Du; Yongli Li; Shuang Chen; Yan Wu; Shaolin Li; Yong Lu; Yuqin Zhang; Xigang Xiao; YueHua Li; Xiao Ma; Xiangyang Gong; Wei Chen; Yingying Yang; Jun Jiao; Bairu Chen; Yinru Lv; Jianbo Gao; GuoBin Hong; Yaling Pan; Yan Yan; Huijuan Qi; Limei Ran; Jian Zhai; Ling Wang; Kai Li; Haihong Fu; Jing Wu; Shiwei Liu; Glen M Blake; Perry J Pickhardt; Yuanzheng Ma; Xiaoxia Fu; Shengyong Dong; Qiang Zeng; Zhiping Guo; Karen Hind; Klaus Engelke; Wei Tian
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 6.741

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.