Christian Lopez Ramos1, Jonathan E Williams2, Yanik J Bababekov3, David C Chang3, Bob S Carter4, Pamela S Jones5. 1. University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 2. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Codman Center for Surgery and Outcomes Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: psjones@partners.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most Americans consult the Internet to address their health concerns. Limited health literacy among the public highlights the need for patient education Web sites to deliver understandable health information. We assessed the understandability and actionability of online neurosurgical patient education materials (PEMs) provided by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and MedlinePlus. METHODS: Articles on neurosurgical conditions and treatments listed on both the AANS site and MedlinePlus were analyzed. Two reviewers scored articles using 2 validated health literacy tools, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CCI) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). These tools evaluate the quality of written health information and assess for content, organization, and actionability of PEMs. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight articles were evaluated from the AANS (n = 61) and MedlinePlus (n = 77). The median CCI score for MedlinePlus and AANS articles was 68.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 62.5-81.3) and 56.3 [IQR, 46.7-73.7], respectively (P < 0.001). Only 1 article scored ≥90%, which is the CCI threshold for PEMs to be considered easy to read. Although the AANS and Medline performed similarly on the understandability component of the PEMAT (66.7 [IQR, 53.8-69.2] vs. 69.2 [IQR, 66.7-83.3], respectively; P < 0.001), significant differences were observed for the actionability section of the PEMAT (Medline 60 [IQR, 60-60] vs. AANS 0 [IQR, 0-60]; P < 0.001). Less than 13% of articles provided summaries, visual aids, and tangible tools to aid patient action. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical online PEMs may be difficult to understand and potentially act as barriers for patients' engagement with health systems. There is a need to deliver patient-centered health information that effectively informs patients, aiding in meaningful health decision making.
BACKGROUND: Most Americans consult the Internet to address their health concerns. Limited health literacy among the public highlights the need for patient education Web sites to deliver understandable health information. We assessed the understandability and actionability of online neurosurgical patient education materials (PEMs) provided by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and MedlinePlus. METHODS: Articles on neurosurgical conditions and treatments listed on both the AANS site and MedlinePlus were analyzed. Two reviewers scored articles using 2 validated health literacy tools, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CCI) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). These tools evaluate the quality of written health information and assess for content, organization, and actionability of PEMs. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight articles were evaluated from the AANS (n = 61) and MedlinePlus (n = 77). The median CCI score for MedlinePlus and AANS articles was 68.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 62.5-81.3) and 56.3 [IQR, 46.7-73.7], respectively (P < 0.001). Only 1 article scored ≥90%, which is the CCI threshold for PEMs to be considered easy to read. Although the AANS and Medline performed similarly on the understandability component of the PEMAT (66.7 [IQR, 53.8-69.2] vs. 69.2 [IQR, 66.7-83.3], respectively; P < 0.001), significant differences were observed for the actionability section of the PEMAT (Medline 60 [IQR, 60-60] vs. AANS 0 [IQR, 0-60]; P < 0.001). Less than 13% of articles provided summaries, visual aids, and tangible tools to aid patient action. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical online PEMs may be difficult to understand and potentially act as barriers for patients' engagement with health systems. There is a need to deliver patient-centered health information that effectively informs patients, aiding in meaningful health decision making.
Authors: Mary Kate Skalitzky; Trevor R Gulbrandsen; William Lorentzen; Burke Gao; Alan G Shamrock; Stuart L Weinstein; Jose A Morcuende Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2021
Authors: Amarbir S Gill; Philip C Biggs; Garrett Hagwood; Angela M Beliveau; Kiarash Shahlaie; E B Strong; Toby O Steele Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2021-05-17
Authors: Burke Gao; Alan G Shamrock; Trevor R Gulbrandsen; Olivia C O'Reilly; Kyle R Duchman; Robert W Westermann; Brian R Wolf Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-07-28
Authors: Caleb Simpeh Edwards; Simon Gashaw Ammanuel; Ogonna N Nnamani Silva; Garret P Greeneway; Katherine M Bunch; Lars W Meisner; Paul S Page; Azam S Ahmed Journal: Surg Neurol Int Date: 2022-09-02
Authors: Trevor Robert Gulbrandsen; Mary Kate Skalitzky; Alan Gregory Shamrock; Burke Gao; Obada Hasan; Benjamin James Miller Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2022-03-24