Literature DB >> 31260833

Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality with Extended Follow-up in the National Lung Screening Trial.

.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) randomized high-risk current and former smokers to three annual screens with either low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) or chest radiography (CXR) and demonstrated a significant reduction in lung cancer mortality in the LDCT arm after a median of 6.5 years' follow-up. We report on extended follow-up of NLST subjects.
METHODS: Subjects were followed by linkage to state cancer registries and the National Death Index. The number needed to screen (NNS) to prevent one lung cancer death was computed as the reciprocal of the difference in the proportion of patients dying of lung cancer across arms. Lung cancer mortality rate ratios (RRs) were computed overall and adjusted for dilution effect, with the latter including only deaths with a corresponding diagnosis close enough to the end of protocol screening.
RESULTS: The median follow-up times were 11.3 years for incidence and 12.3 years for mortality. In all, 1701 and 1681 lung cancers were diagnosed in the LDCT and CXR arms, respectively (RR = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.09). The observed numbers of lung cancer deaths were 1147 (with LDCT) versus 1236 (with CXR) (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-1.00). The difference in the number of patients dying of lung cancer (per 1000) across arms was 3.3, translating into an NNS of 303, which is similar to the original NNS estimate of around 320. The dilution-adjusted lung cancer mortality RR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.997). With regard to overall mortality, there were 5253 (with LDCT) and 5366 (with CXR) deaths, for a difference across arms (per 1000) of 4.2 (95% CI: -2.6 to 10.9).
CONCLUSION: Extended follow-up of the NLST showed an NNS similar to that of the original analysis. There was no overall increase in lung cancer incidence in the LDCT arm versus in the CXR arm. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incidence; Low-dose CT; Lung cancer; Mortality; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31260833      PMCID: PMC6764895          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.05.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  23 in total

1.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Timothy R Church; Richard M Fagerstrom; Barbara Galen; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Jonathan Goldin; John K Gohagan; Bruce Hillman; Carl Jaffe; Barnett S Kramer; David Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Mitchell Schnall; Daniel C Sullivan; Dorothy Sullivan; Carl J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Analysis of mortality data from cancer screening studies: looking in the right window.

Authors:  James A Hanley
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations.

Authors:  D P Naidich; C H Marshall; C Gribbin; R S Arams; D I McCauley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  William D Travis; Elisabeth Brambilla; Masayuki Noguchi; Andrew G Nicholson; Kim R Geisinger; Yasushi Yatabe; David G Beer; Charles A Powell; Gregory J Riely; Paul E Van Schil; Kavita Garg; John H M Austin; Hisao Asamura; Valerie W Rusch; Fred R Hirsch; Giorgio Scagliotti; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Rudolf M Huber; Yuichi Ishikawa; James Jett; Montserrat Sanchez-Cespedes; Jean-Paul Sculier; Takashi Takahashi; Masahiro Tsuboi; Johan Vansteenkiste; Ignacio Wistuba; Pan-Chyr Yang; Denise Aberle; Christian Brambilla; Douglas Flieder; Wilbur Franklin; Adi Gazdar; Michael Gould; Philip Hasleton; Douglas Henderson; Bruce Johnson; David Johnson; Keith Kerr; Keiko Kuriyama; Jin Soo Lee; Vincent A Miller; Iver Petersen; Victor Roggli; Rafael Rosell; Nagahiro Saijo; Erik Thunnissen; Ming Tsao; David Yankelewitz
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial.

Authors:  Ugo Pastorino; Marta Rossi; Valentina Rosato; Alfonso Marchianò; Nicola Sverzellati; Carlo Morosi; Alessandra Fabbri; Carlotta Galeone; Eva Negri; Gabriella Sozzi; Giuseppe Pelosi; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward F Patz; Paul Pinsky; Constantine Gatsonis; Jorean D Sicks; Barnett S Kramer; Martin C Tammemägi; Caroline Chiles; William C Black; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Timothy R Church; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Rafael Meza; Sylvia K Plevritis; Kevin ten Haaf; Vidit N Munshi; Jihyoun Jeon; Saadet Ayca Erdogan; Chung Yin Kong; Summer S Han; Joost van Rosmalen; Sung Eun Choi; Paul F Pinsky; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Martin C Tammemägi; William D Hazelton; Eric J Feuer; Pamela M McMahon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Comparing benefits from many possible computed tomography lung cancer screening programs: extrapolating from the National Lung Screening Trial using comparative modeling.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; Rafael Meza; Sylvia K Plevritis; William C Black; C Martin Tammemagi; Ayca Erdogan; Kevin ten Haaf; William Hazelton; Theodore R Holford; Jihyoun Jeon; Lauren Clarke; Chung Yin Kong; Sung Eun Choi; Vidit N Munshi; Summer S Han; Joost van Rosmalen; Paul F Pinsky; Suresh Moolgavkar; Harry J de Koning; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

View more
  73 in total

1.  Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines Implementation in Primary Care: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; John M Wilkinson; Neil Korsen; David E Midthun
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Lung cancer screening: tell me more about post-test risk.

Authors:  Mario Silva; Gianluca Milanese; Ugo Pastorino; Nicola Sverzellati
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: the importance of study design.

Authors:  David R Baldwin; Matthew E Callister; Philip A Crosbie; Emma L O'Dowd; Robert C Rintoul; Hilary A Robbins; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 4.  Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Evidence from 2 Decades of Study.

Authors:  David S Gierada; William C Black; Caroline Chiles; Paul F Pinsky; David F Yankelevitz
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-03-27

Review 5.  Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Rami P Atallah; Roger D Struble; Robert G Badgett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Strategic Initiatives for Veterans with Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Drew Moghanaki; Michael Hagan
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2020-08

Review 7.  Cancer Screening in Older Adults: Individualized Decision-Making and Communication Strategies.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.456

8.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Follow-Up Adherence for Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: An Application of a Cascade-of-Care Framework.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schut; Eduardo J Mortani Barbosa
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 9.  An update on CT screening for lung cancer: the first major targeted cancer screening programme.

Authors:  David R Baldwin; Matthew E J Callister
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Survival Following Detection of Stage I Lung Cancer by Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.