| Literature DB >> 31258285 |
Maoshuai Li1, Laura Collado1, Fernando Cárdenas-Lizana1, Mark A Keane1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: We have examined the role of support oxygen vacancies in the gas phase hydrogenation of furfural over Au/TiO2 and Au/CeO2 prepared by deposition-precipitation. Both catalysts exhibited a similar Au particle size distribution (1-6 nm) and mean (2.8-3.2 nm). Excess H2 consumption during TPR is indicative of partial support reduction, which was confirmed by O2 titration. Gold on CeO2 with a higher redox potential exhibited a greater oxygen vacancy density. A lower furfural turnover frequency (TOF) was recorded over Au/CeO2 than Au/TiO2 and is linked to suppressed H2 chemisorption capacity and strong -C=O interaction at oxygen vacancies that inhibited activity. Gold on non-reducible Al2O3 as benchmark exhibited greater H2 uptake and delivered the highest furfural TOF. Full selectivity to the target furfuryl alcohol was achieved over Au/TiO2 and Au/Al2O3 at 413 K and over Au/CeO2 at 473 K with hydrogenolysis to 2-methylfuran at higher reaction temperature (523 K). A surface reaction mechanism is proposed to account for the activity/selectivity response.Entities:
Keywords: Furfural; Furfuryl alcohol; Oxygen vacancies; Selective hydrogenation; Supported Au
Year: 2017 PMID: 31258285 PMCID: PMC6560467 DOI: 10.1007/s10562-017-2228-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Catal Letters ISSN: 1011-372X Impact factor: 3.186
Gold loading, specific surface area (SSA), mean Au particle size from STEM analysis (d), H2 consumption during TPR, H2 and O2 uptake and support standard redox potential (E redox) for the supported Au catalysts
| Catalyst | Au/TiO2 | Au/CeO2 | Au/Al2O3 a |
|---|---|---|---|
| Au loading (mol%) | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| SSA (m2 g− 1) | 52 | 64 | 166 |
|
| 3.2 | 2.8 | 4.3 |
| TPR H2 consumption (µmol g− 1) | 174b/147c | 495b/61c | 87b/84c |
| H2 chemisorption (µmol gAu −1)d | 146 | 87 | 318 |
|
| − 0.6 | 1.6 | − 1.7 |
| O2 chemisorption (µmol g− 1)d | 8 | 90 | 1 |
aData from [22]
bExperimental measurements
cH2 required for Au3+ → Au0
dMeasured at 413 K
eTaken from [30]
Fig. 1XRD patterns for (I) Au/TiO2 and (II) Au/CeO2 with JCPDS-ICDD reference diffractograms for (III) anatase-TiO2 (21-1272), (IV) rutile-TiO2 (21-1276) and (V) CeO2 (43-1002)
Fig. 2(I) Representative STEM images with (II) associated Au particle size distribution histograms and (III) temperature programmed reduction (TPR) profiles for A Au/TiO2 (solid bars) and B Au/CeO2 (hatched bars)
Fig. 3Variation of I furfuryl alcohol selectivity (S Furfuryl alcohol) at an equivalent fractional furfural conversion and II turnover frequency (TOF) with temperature for reaction over Au/TiO2 (solid bars), Au/CeO2 (hatched bars) and Au/Al2O3 (grey bars). Reaction conditions: P = 1 atm; T = 413–523 K
Fig. 4Proposed surface furfural adsorption/activation and reaction for Au on reducible supports (CeO2) at oxygen vacancies via (I) the carbonyl group (grey arrows) or (II) furan ring (black arrows)