Literature DB >> 31256217

Pressure changes in the Kager fat pad at the extremes of ankle motion suggest a potential role in Achilles tendinopathy.

F Malagelada1,2, J Stephen3,4, M Dalmau-Pastor5,6,7, L Masci8, M Yeh4, J Vega5,6,9,10, J Calder3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Kager fat pad is one of the largest soft tissue structures local to the ankle joint, yet it is poorly understood. It has been hypothesised to have a role in Achilles tendinopathy. This study aimed to investigate the pressure areas in the Kager fat pad adjacent to the Achilles tendon and to assess the anatomy and deformation of the Kager fat pad in cadavers.
METHODS: Twelve fresh frozen cadaveric ankles (mean age 44 years, range 38-51) were mounted in a customized testing rig, enabling plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the ankle, with the Achilles tendon loaded. A needle tipped pressure sensor was inserted in two areas of the Kager fat pad under ultrasound guidance (retrocalcaneal bursa and at 3 cm proximal from Achilles insertion). Pressure readings were recorded at different flexion angles. Following testing, the specimens were dissected to expose the Kager fat pad and retrieve it for analysis. MRI images were also taken from three healthy volunteers and the Kager fat pad deformation examined.
RESULTS: Mean pressures significantly increased in all specimens at terminal ankle plantar and dorsi flexion in both regions (p < 0.05). The Kager fat pad was consistently adherent to the Achilles at its posterior aspect for a mean length of 7.7 cm (SD 0.27, 89% of KFP length). The most distal part of the Kager fat pad was the exception and it detached from the Achilles to give way to the retroalcaneal bursa for a mean length of 0.92 cm (SD 0.24, 11% of KFP length). The bursal space is partially occupied by a constant 'wedge' extension of Kager fat pad. The mean volume of the whole Kager fat pad was 10.6 ml (SD 3.37). Video and MRI demonstrated that the Kager fat pad undergoes significant deformation during plantar flexion as it is displaced superiorly by the Achilles, with the wedge being forced into the retrocalcaneal bursal space.
CONCLUSION: The Kager fat pad does not remain static during ankle range of motion, but deforms and its pressure also changes. This observation supports the theory that it acts as a shock-absorber to the Achilles tendon and pathological changes to the fat pad may be clinically important in the development of Achilles tendinopathy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achilles; Anatomy; Ankle; Biomechanics; Cadaver; Fat pad

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31256217     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05585-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  11 in total

1.  Infrapatellar fat pad pressure and volume changes of the anterior compartment during knee motion: possible clinical consequences to the anterior knee pain syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Bohnsack; Christof Hurschler; Taskin Demirtas; Oliver Rühmann; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Carl-Joachim Wirth
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The functional anatomy of Kager's fat pad in relation to retrocalcaneal problems and other hindfoot disorders.

Authors:  P Theobald; G Bydder; C Dent; L Nokes; N Pugh; M Benjamin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  The premiere enthesis.

Authors:  J J Canoso
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Fat pads adjacent to tendinopathy: more than a coincidence?

Authors:  Ella Rose Ward; Gustav Andersson; Ludvig J Backman; Jamie E Gaida
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Incidence of midportion Achilles tendinopathy in the general population.

Authors:  S de Jonge; C van den Berg; R J de Vos; H J L van der Heide; A Weir; J A N Verhaar; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; J L Tol
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Differential Motion and Compression Between the Plantaris and Achilles Tendons: A Contributing Factor to Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy?

Authors:  Joanna M Stephen; Daniel Marsland; Lorenzo Masci; James D F Calder; Hadi El Daou
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Minimally invasive retrocalcaneal bursa pressure measurement: development and pilot application.

Authors:  Heinz Lohrer; Thorsten Raabe; Tanja Nauck; Sabine Arentz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Negative interstitial pressure in the peritendinous region during exercise.

Authors:  H Langberg; D Skovgaard; J Bülow; M Kjaer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-09

9.  Retrocalcaneal bursitis but not Achilles tendinopathy is characterized by increased pressure in the retrocalcaneal bursa.

Authors:  Heinz Lohrer; Tanja Nauck
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Acute tear of the fascia cruris at the attachment to the Achilles tendon: a new diagnosis.

Authors:  Nick Webborn; Dylan Morrissey; Kasthuri Sarvananthan; Otto Chan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ankle arthroscopy: the wave that's coming.

Authors:  J Vega; J Karlsson; G M M J Kerkhoffs; M Dalmau-Pastor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Inflammatory mechanisms linking obesity and tendinopathy.

Authors:  Pauline Po Yee Lui; Patrick Shu Hang Yung
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The Kager's fat pad radiological anatomy revised.

Authors:  Paweł Szaro; Mateusz Polaczek; Bogdan Ciszek
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  The anatomical variant of high soleus muscle may predispose to tendinopathy: a preliminary MR study.

Authors:  Eleni E Drakonaki; Khaldun Ghali Gataa; Pawel Szaro
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.