Literature DB >> 31256159

A Standardized Protocol for Maximum Repetition Rate Assessment in Children.

Sanne Diepeveen1,2, Leenke van Haaften3, Hayo Terband4, Bert de Swart5,3, Ben Maassen6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Maximum repetition rate (MRR) is often used in the assessment of speech motor performance in older children and adults. The present study aimed to evaluate a standardized protocol for MRR assessment in young children in Dutch.
METHODS: The sample included 1,524 children of 2-7 years old with no hearing difficulties and Dutch spoken in their nursery or primary school and was representative for children in the Netherlands. The MRR protocol featured mono-, tri-, and bisyllabic sequences and was computer-implemented to maximize standardization.
RESULTS: Less than 50% of the 2-year-olds could produce >1 monosyllabic sequence correctly. Children who could not correctly produce ≥2 monosyllabic sequences could not produce any of the multisyllabic sequences. The effect of instruction ("faster" and "as fast as possible") was small, and multiple attempts yielded a faster MRR in only 20% of the cases. MRRs did not show clinically relevant differences when calculated over different numbers of repeated syllables.
CONCLUSIONS: The MRR protocol is suitable for children of 3 years and older. If children cannot produce at least 2 of the monosyllabic sequences, the multisyllabic tasks should be omitted. Furthermore, all fast attempts of each sequence should be analyzed to determine the fastest MRR.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Maximum repetition rate; Motor speech; Speech

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31256159      PMCID: PMC7050664          DOI: 10.1159/000500305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop        ISSN: 1021-7762            Impact factor:   0.849


  40 in total

1.  Diagnostic markers for child speech-sound disorders: introductory comments.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 2.  A review of standardized tests of nonverbal oral and speech motor performance in children.

Authors:  Rebecca J McCauley; Edythe A Strand
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Reliability of speech diadochokinetic test measurement.

Authors:  Miriam Gadesmann; Nick Miller
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Objective measurement of motor speech characteristics in the healthy pediatric population.

Authors:  A W Wong; J Allegro; Y Tirado; N Chadha; P Campisi
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 1.675

5.  Oral Motor Abilities Are Task Dependent: A Factor Analytic Approach to Performance Rate.

Authors:  Anja Staiger; Theresa Schölderle; Bettina Brendel; Kai Bötzel; Wolfram Ziegler
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Oral-diadochokinesis rates across languages: English and Hebrew norms.

Authors:  Michal Icht; Boaz M Ben-David
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  The input processing, cognitive linguistic and oro-motor skills of children with speech difficulty.

Authors:  Barbara Dodd; Beth McIntosh
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.484

8.  Differential diagnosis of children with suspected childhood apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Elizabeth Murray; Patricia McCabe; Robert Heard; Kirrie J Ballard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Evaluating rate, accuracy, and fluency of young children's diadochokinetic productions: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  J Scott Yaruss; Kenneth J Logan
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.538

10.  Oral diadochokinesis in neurological dysarthrias.

Authors:  H Ackermann; I Hertrich; T Hehr
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 0.849

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Psycholinguistic Framework for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning of Developmental Speech Disorders.

Authors:  Hayo Terband; Ben Maassen; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 0.849

2.  The Use of Segmental and Suprasegmental Sequencing Skills to Differentiate Children With and Without Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Protocol for a Comparative Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Min Ney Wong; Eddy C H Wong; Shelley L Velleman
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-10-04

3.  Digital endpoints for self-administered home-based functional assessment in pediatric Friedreich's ataxia.

Authors:  Arne Mueller; Elaine Paterson; Avery McIntosh; Jens Praestgaard; Mary Bylo; Holger Hoefling; McKenzie Wells; David R Lynch; Christian Rummey; Michelle L Krishnan; Meredith Schultz; C J Malanga
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.511

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.