Literature DB >> 31255443

Marginal bone loss one year after implantation: a systematic review of different loading protocols.

M Sommer1, J Zimmermann1, L Grize2, S Stübinger3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of different loading protocols on marginal bone loss (MBL). The outcomes of different implant loading protocols were assessed at 1year after implantation, with focus on MBL; protocols included immediate, immediate non-occlusal, early, and conventional loading. The search strategy resulted in 889 studies. Twenty-two of these studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the included studies, the lowest MBL was for immediately loaded implants (0.05±0.67mm) and the highest for immediate non-occlusally loaded implants (1.37±0.5mm). The results of the meta-analysis showed an estimated mean MBL of 0.457mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.133-0.781) for immediate loading, 0.390mm (95% CI 0.240-0.540) for immediate non-occlusal loading, 0.488mm (95% CI 0.289-0.687) for early loading (>2 days to <3 months), and 0.852mm (95% CI 0.429-1.275) for conventional loading (>3 months) implant protocols. The lowest decrease in 1-year implant survival per millimetre increase in MBL was observed for immediate loading and the highest for conventional loading. Conventional loading showed a significantly higher MBL than the other three loading protocols. This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that the immediate loading protocol is a reasonable alternative to the conventional loading protocol.
Copyright © 2019 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental implants; loading protocol; marginal bone loss; systematic review

Year:  2019        PMID: 31255443     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

Review 1.  Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations.

Authors:  Jennifer Zimmermann; Melanie Sommer; Leticia Grize; Stefan Stubinger
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2019-07-16

2.  Immediate orthodontic load on dental implants: an option for adult treatment.

Authors:  José Augusto Mendes Miguel; Tatiana Ettore do Valle de Sousa Freitas
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec

3.  Long-term results of immediate implantation in mandibular posterior teeth with early loading: A retrospective case series.

Authors:  Nader Ayubianmarkazi; Douglas Deporter; Maziar Ebrahimi Dastgurdi; Nasrin Akhondi; Mohammad Ketabi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-08-16

4.  Hybrid Funnel Technique: A Novel Approach for Implant Site Preparation: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Luigi Canullo; Roberta Iacono; Eduardo Pires Godoy; Andrea Punzo; Alessio Cavicchia; Francesco Gianfreda; Patrizio Bollero
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  A new classification of peri implant gaps based on gap location (A case series of 210 immediate implants).

Authors:  Douglas Deporter; Ali Akbar Khoshkhounejad; Nikfam Khoshkhounejad; Mohammad Ketabi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-04-06

6.  Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hyeong Gi Kim; Pil-Young Yun; Young-Kyun Kim; Il-Hyung Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.