| Literature DB >> 31255177 |
Elsayed T Mohamed1, Hemanshu Mundhada1, Jenny Landberg1, Isaac Cann2, Roderick I Mackie2, Alex Toftgaard Nielsen1, Markus J Herrgård1, Adam M Feist3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sucrose is an attractive industrial carbon source due to its abundance and the fact that it can be cheaply generated from sources such as sugarcane. However, only a few characterized Escherichia coli strains are able to metabolize sucrose, and those that can are typically slow growing or pathogenic strains.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive laboratory evolution; Escherichia coli; Platform strains; Renewable feedstocks; Sucrose
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31255177 PMCID: PMC6599523 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-019-1165-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Schematic presentation of sucrose utilization mechanism with gene cassette integrated into E. coli K-12 MG1655 and route of sucrose entering into the central carbon metabolism. a The sucrose integrated cassette csc consists of cscA, cscK, and cscB. CscBK and cscA expression is derived by a bi-directional promoter. b Sucrose utilization starts with uptake of sucrose across the cell membrane by cscB (sucrose permease). Inside the cell sucrose is split into glucose and fructose by cscA (invertase). Glucose and fructose are then phosphorylated by glucokinase (glk) and fructokinase (cscK) respectively. Glucose-6-phosphate can be converted to fructose-6-phosophate by the isomerase (pgi) or enter directly into the pentose phosphate pathway (PP-pathway) or Entner-Doudoroff pathway (ED-pathway); fructose-6-phosphate enters the glycolysis directly
Properties of the ALE experiments end point populations
| ALE experiment | Strain (population) | Total CCD x1012 | Ratio of fitness increase to start strain |
|---|---|---|---|
| K-12 MGcscBKA | 1 | 8.65 | 1.72 |
| 2 | 8.75 | 1.46 | |
| 3 | 8.94 | 1.61 | |
| K-12 MGcscBKAp | 1 | 9.02 | 1.48 |
| 2 | 9.02 | 1.47 | |
| 3 | 8.85 | 1.48 | |
| 1 | 9.71 | 1.29 | |
| 2 | 9.78 | 1.31 | |
| 3 | 9.87 | 1.22 |
Ratios of fitness increase were determined from growth rates that were calculated based on the last three flasks during exponential growth. CCD, cumulative cell divisions
Fig. 2Plots of population fitness (i.e., growth rate) trajectories during the ALE experiments on sucrose. Three biological replicates of each of the E. coli strains: a K-12 MG1655cscBKA, b K-12 MG1655cscBKAp, and c W were evolved on 20 g/L sucrose minimal medium. Shown are the growth rates versus cumulative cell divisions (CCD) for the three biological replicates for each strain
Physiological data for the evolved isolates on sucrose M9 medium and sugarcane juice M9 minimal medium (SCJ medium)
| Clone/construct | Clone ID | M9 Sucrose medium | SCJ medium | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth rate, μ (h−1) on M9 2% sucrose | Growth rate, μ (h−1) | Final density (gCDW/L) | Sucrose uptake rate (mmol gCDW−1 h−1) | Acetate production rate (mmol gDW−1 h−1) | Biomass yield, YX/S, (gCDW g of sucrose−1) | Uptake rate fold increase vs start strain | ||
| K-12 MGcscBKA | Starting strain | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 1.47 ± 0.04 | 7.56 ± 0.96 | 4.20 ± 0.20 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 1.00 |
| 1 | 0.85 ± 0.01 | 0.88 ± 0.02 | 1.91 ± 0.03 | 8.71 ± 0.2 | 4.73 ± 0.11 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 1.15 | |
| 2 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 1.52 ± 0.04 | 6.54 ± 0.23 | 5.67 ± 0.54 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.86 | |
| 3 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 0.86 ± 0.02 | 1.68 ± .0.03 | 7.84 ± 0.18 | 5.42 ± 0.13 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 1.04 | |
| K-12 MGcscBKAp | Starting strain | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | 1.48 ± 0.02 | 7.01 ± 1.9 | 4.99 ± 0.25 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | |
| 1 | 0.86 ± 0.01 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | 1.38 ± 0.02 | 9.89 ± 0.19 | 6.83 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 1.41 | |
| 2 | 0.88 ± 0.01 | 0.88 ± 0.01 | 1.44 ± 0.02 | 9.50 ± 0.01 | 8.27 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 1.36 | |
| 3 | 0.80 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.01 | 1.51 ± 0.01 | 8.98 ± 0.11 | 7.30 ± 0.09 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 1.28 | |
| Starting strain | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.97 ± 001 | 1.81 ± 0.05 | 9.88 ± 0.35 | 6.60 ± 0.49 | 0.29 ± .01 | ||
| 1 | 1.10 ± 0.01 | 1.06 ± 0.05 | 1.68 ± 0.06 | 10.5 ± 0.47 | 15.90 ± 0.68 | 0.29 ± 0.012 | 1.06 | |
| 2 | 0.95 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 1.74 ± 0.05 | 14.10 ± 1.0 | 6.50 ± 0.51 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 1.43 | |
| 3 | 0.95 ± 0.01 | 1.08 ± 0.02 | 1.92 ± 0.01 | 12.51 ± 1.1 | 7.40 ± 0.5 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 1.27 | |
The physiological properties of each of the clones isolated from the independent endpoint ALE experiments were compared to examine whether there were any improved phenotypic outcomes across the different experiments
Fig. 3Growth profiles of ALE clones isolated from the end populations of the evolution experiments versus starting strains on M9 minimal medium with 20 g/L sucrose. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3). MG1655 construct with csc (MGcscBKA) growth profile is represented on a, MGcscBKA derivatives with cscB SNP (MGcscBKAp) mutation on b and E. coli W strain on c. Optical density measurement at OD600 were measured on a plate reader and the common ratio between the plate reader OD600 and a benchtop spectrophotometer with a 1 cm path length is 4.2
Fig. 4Characterization of the isolated sucrose-evolved clones on 2 g/L glucose M9 minimal medium. Shown is a stacked histogram of growth rate (h−1, orange) of the selected clones and their corresponding final cellular density (gCDW/L, grey). The plot shows that mutations acquired during the ALE experiment on sucrose were also largely beneficial, to a similar extent, on glucose as a sole carbon source. Error bars represent standard deviation of biological replicates (n = 3). Data is shown for both the starting strains and evolved clones for the three different sets of evolved strains
Key mutations found after evolution of E. coli on sucrose
| Strain | Gene or genetic region | Mutation | Mutation type | Function | Number of independent occurrences | Sample ID (frequency of mutation in population samples) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-12 starting strains MGcscBKA and MGcscBKAp |
| Δ82 bp intragenic | DEL | Orotate phosphoribosyltransferase/ribonuclease PH | 2 | MGcscBKA A1 F136 I0 (43%), MGcscBKA A1 F136 I1, MGcscBKA A3 F140 I0 (25%) |
| T→G intergenic (− 47/+ 19) | SNP | 1 | MGcscBKAp A3 F139 I0 (71%) | |||
|
| S621F (TCC→TTC) | SNP | RNA polymerase subunit β | 1 | MGcscBKA A1 F136 I0 (48%), MGcscBKA A1 F136 I1 | |
| Q618L (CAG→CTG) | SNP | 1 | MGcscBKA A2 F134 I0 (4%) | |||
|
| T1045P (ACC→CCC) | SNP | RNA polymerase subunit β’ | 2 | MGcscBKA A3 F140 I0 R1 (20%), MGcscBKA A3 F140 I1 R1, MGcscBKAp A3 F139 I0 (83%) | |
| R1075C (CGT→TGT) | SNP | 2 | MGcscBKAp A1 F138 I0 (93%), MGcscBKAp A1 F138 I1, MGcscBKAp A2 F140 I0 (100%), MGcscBKAp A2 F140 I1 | |||
| L770R (CTC→CGC) | SNP | 1 | MGcscBKA A3 F140 I0 (76%) | |||
| R978C (CGT→TGT) | SNP | 1 | MGcscBKAp A3 F139 I0 (9.7%), MGcscBKAp A3 F139 I1 | |||
| Q665K (CAG→AAG) | SNP | 1 | MGcscBKA A2 F134 I0 (6%) | |||
| R1174P (CGT→CCT) | SNP | 1 | MGcscBKA A2 F134 I0 (18%) | |||
|
| Δ1403 bp [cscR, dsdX, dsdA] | DEL | Sucrose operon repressor (Csc operon regulatory protein), permease DsdX, | 1 | ||
| Δ84 bp | DEL | Sucrose operon repressor (Csc operon regulatory protein) | 1 | |||
| Δ10 bp | DEL | 1 | ||||
| Δ21 bp | DEL | Sucrose operon repressor (Csc operon regulatory protein) | 1 | |||
| mrdB | S31R (AGC→AGG) | SNP | Rod shape-determining protein RodA | 1 | ||
| S37R (AGC→AGA) | SNP | 1 | ||||
| E270Q (GAA→CAA) | SNP | 1 | ||||
| mrdA | W434C (TGG→TGC) | SNP | Penicillin-binding protein 2 | 1 |
The sample ID has a unique identifier—(A) refers to the independent replicate, (F) refers to the flask number, and (I) to the type of the isolate: population (0) or clone (1)
Source of key mutations validated for causality in isolated strains from the current study or constructed previously from Lacroix et al. [22]
| Genetic region | Mutation | Source |
|---|---|---|
| K-12 MG1655 | N/A | N/A |
| Δ82 bp deletion | LaCroix et al. [ | |
|
| E672K (GAA→AAA) | LaCroix et al. [ |
|
| R1075C (CGT→TGT) | MGcscBKAp A1 F138 I1 MGcscBKAp A2 F140 I1 |
| R978C (CGT→TGT) | MGcscBKAp A3 F139 I1 | |
| T1045P (ACC→CCC) | MGcscBKA A3 F140 I1 with additional mutations of ( | |
| Δ82 bp + E672K (GAA→AAA) | LaCroix et al. [ | |
| Δ82 bp + S621F (TCC→TTC) | MGcscBKA A1 F136 I1 |
Fig. 5Causal mutation analysis for fitness improvement on sucrose and glucose for K-12 strains. Shown is a bar graph representing growth rate of identified causal mutations from the current study (ALE on sucrose) and LaCroix et al. [22] (ALE on glucose). The error bars are calculated from two biological replicates (n = 2). All rpoC mutations originated from this study, as well as the rpoB S621F with the pyrE-rph deletion mutation (i.e., they were not reverse engineered). The remaining mutations were from glucose ALE control experiment (GLUALE) with chromosomally integrated csc gene cassette as described in the methods
Fig. 6Pairwise comparisons of the phenotypic properties of the evolved clones on sugarcane juice M9 minimal medium (SCJ medium). Blue filled circles correspond to MGcscBKA clones, orange filled circles to MGcscBKAp clones and grey filled circles to E. coli W. Overall, sucrose uptake rate versus biomass yield and growth rate versus sucrose uptake rate were the highly correlated. Calculations can be seen in the methods section