Literature DB >> 31254403

Natural history of liver-related disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: An analysis using a Markov chain model.

Toshifumi Tada1,2, Hidenori Toyoda1, Satoshi Yasuda1, Nozomi Miyake1, Takashi Kumada3, Akemi Kurisu2, Masayuki Ohisa2, Tomoyuki Akita2, Junko Tanaka2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term prognosis of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection (HCV) remains incompletely characterized. We investigated the long-term prognosis of liver disease in patients with chronic HCV infection who have not received antiviral therapy.
METHODS: A total of 2304 patients with chronic HCV who were not received interferon-based therapy were included.
RESULTS: In the assessment of 1-year disease state of liver transition probabilities, progression to chronic hepatitis occurred in 12% to 14% of patients across all age groups in male asymptomatic carriers. In male patients with chronic hepatitis, progression to cirrhosis was observed mostly in the 60 to 69 (7.6%) and ≥70 age groups (9.6%). In addition, in male patients with cirrhosis, HCC development occurred in approximately 5% of patients over the age of 40. In female asymptomatic carriers, progression to chronic hepatitis was observed in 6% to 14% of patients across all age groups. In female patients with chronic hepatitis, progression to cirrhosis was observed mostly in the 60 to 69 (8.7%) and ≥70 (7.4%) age groups. In addition, in female patients with cirrhosis, HCC development occurred in 0.9% to 3.3% of patients over the age of 50. Under assumptions of either chronic hepatitis or asymptomatic carrier state at age 40 as the starting condition for simulation over the following 40 years, the probability of HCC gradually increased with age and was higher in male patients.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a risk of cirrhosis or HCC development in HCV patients with not only chronic hepatitis but the asymptomatic carrier state as well.
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov chain model; hepatitis C virus; interferon; natural history; transition probability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31254403      PMCID: PMC6771942          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


alanine aminotransferase aspartate aminotransferase direct‐acting antiviral hepatocellular carcinoma hepatitis C virus interferon person‐year sustained virological response

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 180 million individuals worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). It is a common cause of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Japan, the United States, and many European countries.1, 2 Chronic infection with HCV is a major cause of progressive liver damage and long‐term sequelae such as cirrhosis and HCC. Interferon (IFN)‐based therapy has been performed to treat HCV patients with chronic hepatitis or decompensated cirrhosis. There have been many reports that IFN‐based therapy is useful for reducing serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, clearing HCV RNA, and improving the liver fibrosis in patients with chronic HCV infection.3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Elimination of HCV has also been reported to decrease the occurrence of HCC.6, 8 In other words, IFN‐based therapy evidently decreases the incidence of liver disease–related mortality and prolongs life expectancy.9, 10, 11 Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) have recently been developed to treat chronic HCV infection. They have resulted in higher rates of sustained virological response (SVR), shorter and simpler regimens, and minimal treatment‐related side effects. Many patients with chronic HCV infection, including asymptomatic carriers as well as patients with chronic hepatitis and decompensated cirrhosis, have recently received DAA therapy and achieved SVR in Japan.12, 13, 14 However, the long‐term prognosis of patients with chronic HCV infection, especially asymptomatic carriers, remains incompletely characterized. Therefore, clarifying the natural history of chronic HCV infection in asymptomatic carriers is important for estimating the benefits of DAA‐based therapy. Markov chain models are useful for simulating the natural history of chronic diseases.15, 16 Disease states obtained from patients are individually determined and incorporated into a system of transitional probabilities from 1 state to another inside of a cycle (generally lasting 1 year). In the present study, we simulated the long‐term prognosis of liver disease in chronic HCV patients who did not receive antiviral therapy using the Markov chain model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

This study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Ogaki Municipal Hospital and Hiroshima University. It was in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all study patients for use of their laboratory data. A total of 8954 consecutive patients who tested positive for HCV antibodies were treated at our institution, between October 1994 and September 2014. Of these, 2743 (32 469 person‐year [PY] units) met the following inclusion criteria: (1) detectable levels of HCV RNA for longer than 6 months; (2) negative of hepatitis B virus infection; (3) negative of human immunodeficiency virus co‐infection; (4) no other causes of chronic liver disease such as alcohol consumption >80 g/day, hepatotoxic drugs, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, hemochromatosis, and Wilson's disease; (5) HCC surveillance performed during the follow‐up period; (6) follow‐up duration greater than 3 years from the first visit; (7) no incidence of HCC for at least 1 year after the first visit; and (8) complete clinical data. Of these 2743 patients, 1011 patients received IFN‐based therapy and the remaining 1732 patients did not receive IFN‐based therapy during the follow‐up period. Of the 1011 patients who received IFN‐based therapy, 439 patients started this therapy at the start of follow‐up. The remaining 572 patients received IFN‐based therapy later during the follow‐up period; their clinical data before the start of IFN‐based therapy was used for analysis. Consequently, 2304 patients (1732 patients with no IFN‐based therapy during the follow‐up period and 572 patients with IFN‐based therapy during the follow‐up period) were included in the study (Figure 1), resulting in 20 140 PY units.
Figure 1

Flowchart of the patient selection process. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IFN, interferon

Flowchart of the patient selection process. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IFN, interferon Yearly liver disease states were acquired by surveillance of HCC program data of the study patients. The day of the initial visit was decided as the start of follow‐up. The last of follow‐up in patients who did not receive IFN‐based therapy was defined as the day of the final visit for patients who remained alive or HCC‐free, as the day of HCC diagnosis for patients who developed HCC, or as the day of death for patients who perished in the course of the follow‐up period. Regarding patients who received IFN‐based therapy during follow‐up, the last of follow‐up was decided as the day when IFN‐based therapy began. Since there was little data of liver pathology for confirming cirrhosis, we assessed the fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) index as a scoring system of hepatic fibrosis. It was previously studied to have useful in predicting fibrosis in patients with chronic HCV infection.17, 18 This index is calculated as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) [IU/L] × age [years]/platelet count [109/L] × ALT [IU/L]1/2.

HCV RNA and genotype were confirmed using PCR

At our institution, the decision to offer IFN‐based therapy to patients with chronic HCV infection was determined based on the clinical guidelines.19, 20, 21 The 1732 patients who did not receive IFN‐based therapy for chronic HCV infection had no indications for IFN‐based therapy or declined treatment. If a patient with an indication for IFN‐based therapy declined after being provided with sufficient information about the treatment, they received hepatoprotective medications (eg, ursodeoxycholic acid) as an alternative therapy.

HCC surveillance

HCC surveillance was conducted every 3 to 6 months. It included ultrasonography and blood tests, including measurement of the tumor marker α‐fetoprotein according to the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan.22 If a nodular lesion was detected by ultrasonography or a tumor marker was found to be elevated, additional imaging studies (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or both) were performed. The diagnosis of HCC was based on imaging characteristics specified by the guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.23, 24

Disease states and diagnosis of liver

In the present study, we decided disease states of liver as asymptomatic carrier, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and HCC. Disease states were defined according to the following criteria25, 26: Asymptomatic carrier: ALT less than 35 IU/L and absence of liver cirrhosis; Chronic hepatitis: ALT or more 35 IU/L and absence of liver cirrhosis; Cirrhosis: FIB‐4 index > 3.2517, 18; and HCC: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines.23, 24

Markov chain model analysis

The form (Figure 2) and hypothesis of the Markov chain model in the present study are in the following manner. The Markov model composed of four disease states (asymptomatic carrier, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and HCC) that were collectively exhaustive and mutually exclusive.
Figure 2

Structure of the Markov chain model. The transition between HCV‐related liver disease states based on the Markov model is shown. HCC is the absorbing state from which no transitions to other states can occur. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus

Transitions in the four disease states of liver appeared at 1‐year intervals. The disease state of liver transitions in the next year relied only on the disease state of this year. HCC was assumed to be an absorbing state, defined as having no later transitions to other liver disease states. 1‐year transition probability estimates were stratified by age and sex. Structure of the Markov chain model. The transition between HCV‐related liver disease states based on the Markov model is shown. HCC is the absorbing state from which no transitions to other states can occur. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus Annual transition probabilities for each state of liver were analyzed according to sex and 10‐year age groups. Next, the initial starting conditions were specified as asymptomatic carrier and chronic hepatitis at age 40. The % probabilities for transition crosswise liver states for the following 40 years were simulated according to yearly transition probability processions in the study patients, stratified by sex.

Statistical methods

Quantitative data are expressed as median values (interquartile range). Data analysis was carried out by JMP (version 9, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Characteristics of patients

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study patients. The patients comprised of 1174 (51.0%) males and 1130 (49.0%) females with a median (interquartile range) age of 61.0 (52.0‐68.0) years. There were 548 (23.8%) asymptomatic carriers, 932 (40.5%) patients with chronic hepatitis, and 824 (35.8%) patients with cirrhosis at the start of follow‐up (Table 2). Table S1 also shows the number of liver disease states at the start of follow‐up among study patients stratified by sex and 10‐year age group. During follow‐up, 473 patients developed HCC. The median follow‐up was 10.7 (6.7‐15.0) years.
Table 1

Patient characteristics (N = 2304)

Age, y a 61.0 (52.0‐68.0)
Sex, male/female1174/1130
AST, IU/L a 42 (28‐70)
ALT, IU/L a 45 (27‐80)
Albumin, g/dL a 4.1 (3.8‐4.3)
Total bilirubin, mg/dL a 0.6 (0.4‐0.8)
Prothrombin time, % a 96.0 (85.0‐107.0)
Platelet count,  × 104/mm3 a 16.6 (12.5‐20.9)
α‐fetoprotein, ng/mL a 3.9 (2.2‐8.0)
FIB‐4 index a 2.4 (1.5‐4.1)
HCV genotype, 1/2/unknown1197/631/476
HCV RNA, log10 IU/mL a 5.6 (4.5‐6.1)
Follow‐up duration, y a 10.7 (6.7‐15.0)
Development of HCC473

Abbreviations: AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus.

Values are expressed as medians (interquartile range).

Table 2

Age‐ and sex‐specific 1‐y liver disease state transition probability matrices

1‐y transition probability
MalesFemales
Asymptomatic carrierChronic hepatitisCirrhosisHCCAsymptomatic carrierChronic hepatitisCirrhosisHCC
Initial state
Age: 30‐39 y
Asymptomatic carrier81.3%12.5%6.2%0.0%94.0%6.0%0.0%0.0%
Chronic hepatitis97.8%2.2%0.0%99.4%0.6%0.0%
Cirrhosis100.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%
Age: 40‐49 y
Asymptomatic carrier87.2%12.8%0.0%0.0%85.0%13.7%1.3%0.0%
Chronic hepatitis95.6%4.4%0.0%98.3%1.7%0.0%
Cirrhosis95.3%4.7%100.0%0.0%
Age: 50‐59 y
Asymptomatic carrier84.3%13.6%2.1%0.0%90.1%8.9%1.0%0.0%
Chronic hepatitis94.9%4.6%0.5%94.9%5.0%0.1%
Cirrhosis95.8%4.2%99.1%0.9%
Age: 60‐69 y
Asymptomatic carrier84.7%11.3%4.0%0.0%88.7%7.6%3.7%0.0%
Chronic hepatitis91.7%7.6%0.7%91.1%8.7%0.2%
Cirrhosis95.1%4.9%97.3%2.7%
Age: ≥70 y
Asymptomatic carrier83.0%9.0%7.7%0.3%89.4%7.0%3.4%0.2%
Chronic hepatitis88.4%9.6%2.0%92.4%7.4%0.2%
Cirrhosis95.2%4.8%96.7%3.3%

Abbreviation: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

Patient characteristics (N = 2304) Abbreviations: AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus. Values are expressed as medians (interquartile range). Age‐ and sex‐specific 1‐y liver disease state transition probability matrices Abbreviation: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

1‐Year disease state of liver transition probability processions

The 1‐year disease state of liver transition probabilities in the four disease states of liver were analyzed according to 20 140 PY units. Table 2 shows the 1‐year disease state of liver transition probability processions in the study patients according to sex and 10‐year age group. In male asymptomatic carriers, progression to chronic hepatitis was observed in 12% to 14% over all age groups. In male patients with chronic hepatitis, progression to cirrhosis was observed mostly in the 60 to 69 (7.6%) and ≥70 age groups (9.6%). In male patients with cirrhosis, HCC development was observed in the 40 to 49 (4.4%), 50 to 59 (4.2%), 60 to 69 (4.9%), and ≥70 age groups (4.8%). In female asymptomatic carriers, progression to chronic hepatitis was observed in 6% to 14% over all age groups. In female patients with chronic hepatitis, progression to cirrhosis was observed mostly in the 60 to 69 (8.7%) and ≥70 age groups (7.4%). In female patients with cirrhosis, HCC development was observed in the 50 to 59 (0.9%), 60 to 69 (2.7%), and ≥70 age groups (3.3%).

Simulation of the % probabilities for transition crosswise states of liver in asymptomatic carriers at age 40 by the Markov chain model

The asymptomatic carrier state at age 40 was the primary starting state for simulation over following 40 years. In both male (Figure 3a) and female (Figure 3b) patients, the probability of developing chronic hepatitis gradually increased with age until the 50 seconds. The probability of developing cirrhosis gradually increased with age until 70 seconds. The probability of developing HCC increased gradually with age. The probability of HCC was higher in male vs female patients in the same age group. In male patients, the probability of HCC was higher than the probability of cirrhosis by age 80. Conversely, in female patients, the probability of HCC was lower than the probability of cirrhosis by age 80.
Figure 3

Natural history of liver disease over 40 years in hypothetical cohorts of asymptomatic carriers at age 40. A, Males: At age 50, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 25.4% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 58.4%, cirrhosis for 14.4%, and HCC for 2.2%. At age 60, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 4.6% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 48.0%, cirrhosis for 32.5%, and HCC for 14.9%. At age 70, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 0.9% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 21.9%, cirrhosis for 41.1%, and HCC for 36.1%. At age 80, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 0.1% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 6.6%, cirrhosis for 35.3%, and HCC for 58.0%. B, Females: At age 50, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 19.7% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 66.5%, cirrhosis for 13.8%, and HCC for 0.0%. At age 60, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 7.0% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 47.9%, cirrhosis for 42.0%, and HCC for 3.1%. At age 70, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 2.1% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 20.9%, cirrhosis for 58.8%, and HCC for 18.2%. At age 80, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 0.7% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 10.1%, cirrhosis for 52.2%, and HCC for 37.0%. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma

Natural history of liver disease over 40 years in hypothetical cohorts of asymptomatic carriers at age 40. A, Males: At age 50, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 25.4% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 58.4%, cirrhosis for 14.4%, and HCC for 2.2%. At age 60, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 4.6% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 48.0%, cirrhosis for 32.5%, and HCC for 14.9%. At age 70, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 0.9% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 21.9%, cirrhosis for 41.1%, and HCC for 36.1%. At age 80, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 0.1% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 6.6%, cirrhosis for 35.3%, and HCC for 58.0%. B, Females: At age 50, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 19.7% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 66.5%, cirrhosis for 13.8%, and HCC for 0.0%. At age 60, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 7.0% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 47.9%, cirrhosis for 42.0%, and HCC for 3.1%. At age 70, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 2.1% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 20.9%, cirrhosis for 58.8%, and HCC for 18.2%. At age 80, asymptomatic carrier status accounted for 0.7% of patients, chronic hepatitis for 10.1%, cirrhosis for 52.2%, and HCC for 37.0%. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma

Simulation of the % probabilities for transition crosswise states of liver in patients with chronic hepatitis at age 40 by the Markov chain model

The chronic hepatitis state at age 40 was the primary starting state for simulation over following 40 years. In both male (Figure 4a) and female (Figure 4b) patients, the probability of developing cirrhosis gradually increased with age until the 70 seconds. In male patients, the probability of developing HCC gradually increased with age. In female patients, the probability of HCC gradually increased with age starting in the 50 seconds. In male patients, the probability of HCC was higher than the probability of cirrhosis by age 70. Conversely, in female patients, the probability of HCC was lower than the probability of cirrhosis across all age groups.
Figure 4

Natural history of liver disease over 40 years in hypothetical cohorts of patients with chronic hepatitis at age 40. A, Males: At age 50, chronic hepatitis accounted for 63.7% of patients, cirrhosis for 29.0%, and HCC for 7.3%. At age 60, chronic hepatitis accounted for 37.7% of patients, cirrhosis for 38.0%, and HCC for 24.3%. At age 70, chronic hepatitis accounted for 15.9% of patients, cirrhosis for 38.6%, and HCC for 45.5%. At age 80, chronic hepatitis accounted for 4.6% of patients, cirrhosis for 30.7%, and HCC for 64.7%. B, Females: At age 50, chronic hepatitis accounted for 84.6% of patients, cirrhosis for 15.4%, and HCC for 0.0%. At age 60, chronic hepatitis accounted for 49.9% of patients, cirrhosis for 46.5%, and HCC for 3.6%. At age 70, chronic hepatitis accounted for 19.7% of patients, cirrhosis for 60.8%, and HCC for 19.5%. At age 80, chronic hepatitis accounted for 9.0% of patients, cirrhosis for 52.4%, and HCC for 38.6%. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma

Natural history of liver disease over 40 years in hypothetical cohorts of patients with chronic hepatitis at age 40. A, Males: At age 50, chronic hepatitis accounted for 63.7% of patients, cirrhosis for 29.0%, and HCC for 7.3%. At age 60, chronic hepatitis accounted for 37.7% of patients, cirrhosis for 38.0%, and HCC for 24.3%. At age 70, chronic hepatitis accounted for 15.9% of patients, cirrhosis for 38.6%, and HCC for 45.5%. At age 80, chronic hepatitis accounted for 4.6% of patients, cirrhosis for 30.7%, and HCC for 64.7%. B, Females: At age 50, chronic hepatitis accounted for 84.6% of patients, cirrhosis for 15.4%, and HCC for 0.0%. At age 60, chronic hepatitis accounted for 49.9% of patients, cirrhosis for 46.5%, and HCC for 3.6%. At age 70, chronic hepatitis accounted for 19.7% of patients, cirrhosis for 60.8%, and HCC for 19.5%. At age 80, chronic hepatitis accounted for 9.0% of patients, cirrhosis for 52.4%, and HCC for 38.6%. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma

DISCUSSION

The present study, which included a great number of patients with chronic hepatitis C (20 140 PY units) who did not receive IFN‐based antiviral therapy during the follow‐up period, clarified the long‐term natural history of liver‐related disease in this cohort. In the assessment of 1‐year liver disease state transition probability matrices, progression to chronic hepatitis from the asymptomatic carrier state was observed in 12% to 14% of male patients and 6% to 14% of female patients with chronic hepatitis C across all age groups. In male patients with cirrhosis, the transition probability of developing HCC over the age of 40 was approximately 5%. Conversely, in female patients with cirrhosis, the transition probability of developing HCC was approximately 3% over the age of 60. Thus, there is a risk of HCC development in all males over the age of 40 and older female HCV patients with cirrhosis. The results also suggest that there is a risk of progression to chronic hepatitis from the asymptomatic carrier state in both male and female patients with chronic HCV infection, even at a relatively young age. Based on the Markov chain simulation in HCV patients with the asymptomatic carrier or the chronic hepatitis state at age 40, transition to the state of HCC was further found in male patients. Therefore, chronic HCV infection is a risk factor for liver disease progression during long‐term follow‐up even in asymptomatic carriers. Chronic infection with HCV is the leading cause of end‐stage liver disease, HCC, and liver‐related death. Clinical outcomes after HCV infection are highly variable. HCV infection is infrequently diagnosed during the acute phase because most persons have either no symptoms or only mild symptoms. Asymptomatic HCV infection becomes chronic in most cases, and people are unaware of being infected until end‐stage liver disease occurs. Several longitudinal studies27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 were conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes related to HCV infection. In these studies, rates of cirrhosis have ranged from 17% to 55%, rates of HCC have ranged from 1% to 23%, and rates of liver‐related death have ranged from 1% to 23% over an estimated infection period of 20 to 30 years.27, 35, 36 However, these studies mainly enrolled specific populations such as patients with post‐transfusion hepatitis,28 blood donors,30 drug abusers,31 and women vaccinated with contaminated immunoglobulins.27, 34 Therefore, the natural history of the chronic HCV infection remains incompletely characterized. Although our study was retrospective in nature, we clarified the natural history of chronic HCV infection in patients with chronic hepatitis as well as asymptomatic carriers at the start of follow‐up. The advantage of our study compared with previous reports was that we estimated the long‐term prognosis of liver disease in patients with persistent HCV infection over 40 years. Intervention in the form of DAA therapy to eradicate HCV is necessary even in asymptomatic carriers in view of the long‐term natural history of persistent HCV infection. Recent years, various laboratory scoring systems of fibrosis have been developed in patients with chronic liver disease.17, 18, 37, 38, 39, 40 Vallet‐Pichard et al18 reported that the FIB‐4 index is accordant with liver fibrosis according to pathological assessment of liver biopsy specimens in patients with chronic HCV infection. They reported that the FIB‐4 index enabled the correct identification of chronic HCV patients with severe fibrosis (F3‐F4) and cirrhosis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.82‐0.89) and 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.86‐0.93), respectively.18 Additionally, previous studies have reported that older age, male sex, lower albumin levels and platelet count, and elevated ALT, AST, and α‐fetoprotein levels are significant risk factors for cirrhosis and HCC.41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 The FIB‐4 index is assessed using age, AST, ALT, and platelet count. In other words, the FIB‐4 index is considered to be a more complex scoring system for evaluating the incidence of liver‐related events in patients with chronic HCV infection. The Markov model assesses data measured repeatedly with general outcomes. These types of styles explain how a transition of patient between a course of states of disease over long‐term periods, which is likeable in the explanation of processes of disease that certainly include progression across stages of advancing severity.47 In the present study, we analyzed the Markov chain model to estimate the 1‐year disease state of liver transition probabilities in four disease states of liver (ie, asymptomatic carrier, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and HCC) in patients with the asymptomatic carrier state, chronic hepatitis, or cirrhosis who did not receive IFN‐based therapy. Particularly, we analyzed the % probabilities for transition crosswise liver states on the long‐term periods in asymptomatic carriers and chronic hepatitis patients at age 40. The principal limitations of the present research involve its hospital‐based subjects and retrospective study. Therefore, further prospective studies with community‐based subjects are warranted. Another limitation was that the FIB‐4 index, originally an index of liver fibrosis, can overestimate the progression of liver fibrosis because it includes age, a strongly time‐dependent factor. In addition, liver cirrhosis was determined as FIB‐4 index or more 3.25 in this study. Consequently, it was considered that more or less patients with significant liver fibrosis stage were determined as liver cirrhosis. Further research by imaging elastography or pathological data for the confirmation of liver cirrhosis are warranted. Further, in this study, the asymptomatic carrier was defined as patients with ALT less than 35 IU/L. Therefore, it was possible that there were some patients with chronic hepatitis even in patients who were defined as asymptomatic carrier. In conclusion, according to the Markov chain model, poor liver disease outcomes such as the progression of liver cirrhosis or HCC are possible not only in patients with chronic hepatitis but also in patients who are asymptomatic carriers at age ≥ 40 years. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings in other populations.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Concept and study design: JT and TT. Data acquisition: All authors. Analyses of the data: MO, TA, and JT. Statistics: MO, TA, and JT. Supervision: TK. Preparing manuscript: TT. Review and approval: All authors. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Supporting information Click here for additional data file.
  44 in total

1.  Alanine aminotransferase level as a predictor of hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in a community-based population in Japan.

Authors:  Robert Suruki; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Kazunori Kusumoto; Hirofumi Uto; Akio Ido; Hirohito Tsubouchi; Sherri O Stuver
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2018.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a prospective study.

Authors:  F Imbert-Bismut; V Ratziu; L Pieroni; F Charlotte; Y Benhamou; T Poynard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Interferon therapy reduces the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: national surveillance program of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan. IHIT Study Group. Inhibition of Hepatocarcinogenesis by Interferon Therapy.

Authors:  H Yoshida; Y Shiratori; M Moriyama; Y Arakawa; T Ide; M Sata; O Inoue; M Yano; M Tanaka; S Fujiyama; S Nishiguchi; T Kuroki; F Imazeki; O Yokosuka; S Kinoyama; G Yamada; M Omata
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Long-term effect of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis.

Authors:  C-H Hung; C-M Lee; S-N Lu; J-H Wang; T-H Hu; H-D Tung; C-H Chen; W-J Chen; C-S Changchien
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.728

6.  Prognosis of chronic hepatitis C: results of a large, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  C Niederau; S Lange; T Heintges; A Erhardt; M Buschkamp; D Hürter; M Nawrocki; L Kruska; F Hensel; W Petry; D Häussinger
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Increased rate of death related to presence of viremia among hepatitis C virus antibody-positive subjects in a community-based cohort study.

Authors:  Hirofumi Uto; Sherri O Stuver; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Kotaro Kumagai; Fumisato Sasaki; Shuji Kanmura; Masatsugu Numata; Akihiro Moriuchi; Susumu Hasegawa; Makoto Oketani; Akio Ido; Kazunori Kusumoto; Satoru Hasuike; Kenji Nagata; Michinori Kohara; Hirohito Tsubouchi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  The presence of steatosis and elevation of alanine aminotransferase levels are associated with fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C with non-response to interferon therapy.

Authors:  Masayuki Kurosaki; Kotaro Matsunaga; Itsuko Hirayama; Tomohiro Tanaka; Mitsuaki Sato; Nobutoshi Komatsu; Naoki Umeda; Takanori Hosokawa; Ken Ueda; Kaoru Tsuchiya; Hiroyuki Nakanishi; Jun Itakura; Yasuhiro Asahina; Shozo Miyake; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Namiki Izumi
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 10.  APASL consensus statements and recommendation on treatment of hepatitis C.

Authors:  Masao Omata; Tatsuo Kanda; Lai Wei; Ming-Lung Yu; Wang-Long Chuang; Alaaeldin Ibrahim; Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana; Jose Sollano; Manoj Kumar; Ankur Jindal; Barjesh Chander Sharma; Saeed S Hamid; A Kadir Dokmeci; Geofferey W McCaughan; Jafri Wasim; Darrell H G Crawford; Jia-Horng Kao; Osamu Yokosuka; George K K Lau; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 6.047

View more
  4 in total

1.  Natural history of liver-related disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: An analysis using a Markov chain model.

Authors:  Toshifumi Tada; Hidenori Toyoda; Satoshi Yasuda; Nozomi Miyake; Takashi Kumada; Akemi Kurisu; Masayuki Ohisa; Tomoyuki Akita; Junko Tanaka
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.327

2.  Direct-acting antivirals improve survival and recurrence rates after treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria.

Authors:  Hironori Ochi; Atsushi Hiraoka; Masashi Hirooka; Yohei Koizumi; Michiko Amano; Nobuaki Azemoto; Takao Watanabe; Osamu Yoshida; Yoshio Tokumoto; Toshie Mashiba; Tomoyuki Yokota; Masanori Abe; Kojiro Michitaka; Yoichi Hiasa; Kouji Joko
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for Real-World HCV Infected Patients in the Northern Part of Tokyo, Japan.

Authors:  Yoichiro Yamana; Tatsuo Kanda; Naoki Matsumoto; Masayuki Honda; Mariko Kumagawa; Reina Sasaki; Shini Kanezawa; Taku Mizutani; Hiroaki Yamagami; Ryota Masuzaki; Tomotaka Ishii; Kazushige Nirei; Mitsuhiko Moriyama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Health Inequality among Fishery Workers during Climate Change: A National Population-Based and Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ming-Shyan Lin; Yu-Chih Lin; Tung-Jung Huang; Mei-Yen Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.