Literature DB >> 31254259

Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality.

Melisa Menceloglu1, Marcia Grabowecky2,3, Satoru Suzuki2,3.   

Abstract

The timing and the sensory modality of behaviorally relevant events often vary predictably, so that it is beneficial to adapt the sensory system to their statistical regularities. Indeed, statistical information about target timing and/or sensory modality modulates behavioral responses-called expectation effects. Responses are also facilitated by short-term repetitions of target timing and/or sensory modality-called priming effects. We examined how the expectation and priming effects on target timing (short vs. long cue-to-target interval) and target modality (auditory vs. visual) interacted. Temporal expectation was manipulated across blocks, while modality expectation was manipulated across participants. Responses were faster when targets were presented at the expected timing and/or in the expected modality in an additive manner, suggesting that temporal and modality expectation operate relatively independently. Similarly, responses were faster when the timing and/or modality of targets was repeated across trials in an additive manner, suggesting that temporal and modality priming operate relatively independently. Importantly, the interactions between expectation and priming were domain specific. In the temporal domain, temporal-expectation effects were observed only when temporal-priming effects were absent. In the modality domain, modality-priming effects predominated for auditory targets whereas modality-expectation effects predominated for visual targets. Thus, the interactions between probability-driven expectation and stimulus-driven priming processes appear to be controlled separately for the mechanisms that direct attention to specific temporal intervals and for the mechanisms that direct attention to specific sensory modalities. These results may suggest that the sensory system concurrently optimizes attentional priorities within temporal and sensory-modality domains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention: Selective; Temporal processing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31254259      PMCID: PMC6858536          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01798-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  36 in total

1.  Orienting attention in time. Modulation of brain potentials.

Authors:  C Miniussi; E L Wilding; J T Coull; A C Nobre
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Modality-specific auditory and visual temporal processing deficits.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-01

Review 3.  The hazards of time.

Authors:  Ac Nobre; A Correa; Jt Coull
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation.

Authors:  Michael B Steinborn; Bettina Rolke; Daniel Bratzke; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-10

5.  Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited.

Authors:  Scott Sinnett; Charles Spence; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-07

6.  Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Sarah Lukas; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2014-11-01

7.  Temporal expectation weights visual signals over auditory signals.

Authors:  Melisa Menceloglu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

8.  Temporal orienting precedes intersensory attention and has opposing effects on early evoked brain activity.

Authors:  Julian Keil; Ulrich Pomper; Nele Feuerbach; Daniel Senkowski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Crossmodal links between audition and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  Donna M Lloyd; Natasha Merat; Francis McGlone; Charles Spence
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Rhythm Violation Enhances Auditory-Evoked Responses to the Extent of Overriding Sensory Adaptation in Passive Listening.

Authors:  Melisa Menceloglu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.