| Literature DB >> 31252613 |
José Miguel Sánchez-Nieto1, María de la Luz Martínez-Maldonado2, María Montero-López Lena3, Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that Mental Stimulation (MS) has a positive effect on cognitive functions and wellbeing. In this sense, different training activities have been proposed for MS such as theater, learning a new language, playing a musical instrument and computing, however, there are few studies on older adults in Latin American countries. For this reason, the purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of a mental stimulation program (MSP) of computer and Internet learning on cognitive functions and wellbeing in older community-dwelling Mexicans.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive functions; computer and internet; learning; mental stimulation; older community-dwelling Mexicans
Year: 2019 PMID: 31252613 PMCID: PMC6680593 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9070151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Figure 1Outline of the study.
Topics of the computer course.
| 1. Basic conceptsaboutcomputing | 11. Searchfor places onthe Internet |
| 2. Operatingsystem and mouse | 12. Visits to virtual museums |
| 3. Keyboard use | 13. Searchforinformationpagesonthe Internet |
| 4. Folders and subfolders | 14. Internet procedures |
| 5. Folders and subfolders 2 | 15. Downloadmusicfromthe internet |
| 6. Basic concepts and Internet search | 16. Search of activitiesfortheweekend |
| 7. Searchonthe Internet: images | 17. Searchforentertainment 1 |
| 8. Characteristics of Internet pages | 18. Searchforentertainment 2 |
| 9. Internet search: videos | 19. Searchforentertainment 3 |
| 10. Internet search: Games | 20. Searchforentertainment 4 |
Mean Score of Processing Speed, Working Memory and Inhibition Tests by Study.
| Experimental Group (EG) ( | Control Group (CG) ( | Change EG | Change EC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |||
| Processingspeed | ||||||
| SDMT | 22 ± 6 | 25 ± 7 | 20 ± 4 | 21 ± 5 | 3.3 ± 3.4 | 0.4 ± 2.3 |
| TMTA | 245 ± 19 | 256 ± 14 | 239 ± 19 | 236 ± 25 | 11.1 ± 13.1 | −3.3 ± 13.7 |
| SC | 58 ± 6 | 60 ± 7 | 62 ± 6 | 58 ± 1 | 2.5 ± 5.3 | −4.1 ± 5 |
| Workingmemory | ||||||
| TMTB | 161 ± 51 | 181 ± 45 | 151 ± 41 | 147 ± 47 | 24.0 ± 6 | 19.2 ± 5.8 |
| LNS | 13 ± 2 | 14 ± .2 | 13 ± 3 | 12 ± 3 | 1.4 ± 1.7 | −1.1 ± 1.7 |
| PASAT 3s | 30.7 ± 7 | 33.4 ± 10.4 | 29.1 ± 7.4 | 27.0 ± 9.4 | 2.7 ± 6.1 | −2.1 ± 4.9 |
| Cognitive inhibition | ||||||
| SC-W | 29 ± 6 | 32 ± 7 | 30 ± 6 | 30 ± 6 | 3.2 ± 3.3 | −0.6 ± 5.0 |
Repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.05, PS: Processing speed; WM: Working memory; SDMT: Symbol Digit Modalities Test; TMT A: Trail Making Test A; SC: Stroop color; TMT B: Trail Making Test B; LNS: Letter–Number Sequencing; PASAT: Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test; SC-W:Stroop color-Word
Mean Score of Episodic Memory and Visuospatial Processing Tests by Study Group.
| Experimental Group (EG) ( | Control Group (CG) ( | Change EG | Change CG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |||
| Episodicmemory | ||||||
| E5 | 11 ± 2 | 13 ± 1 | 11 ± 2 | 10 ± 2 | 2.3 ± 1.8* | −0.3 ± 1.6 |
| Learning | 41 ± 6 | 53 ± 6 | 40 ± 5 | 41 ± 7 | 12.2 ± 7.2* | 0.73 ± 5.5 |
| E7 | 10 ± 2 | 11.0 ± 1.7 | 9.2 ± 1.6 | 10 ± 2 | 1.2 ± 2.3 | 0.4 ± 2.3 |
| Visuospatial processing | ||||||
| MR | 9 ± 4 | 12 ± 4 | 8 ± 2 | 8 ± 3 | 2.9 ± .7* | 1.1 ± 0.03 |
*, Repeated measures ANOVA p < 0.05, E5: trial 5; E7: trial 7; MR: Matrix reasoning.
Mean Score of Negative and Positive Emotion and Satisfaction with Life Tests by Study Group.
| Experimental Group (EG) ( | Control Group (CG) ( | Change EG | ChangeCG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |||
| NE | 22.19 ± 8.2 | 16.7 ± 5.6 | 22.82 ± 5.6 | 17.5 ± 6.9 | -5.5 ± 6.7 | −5.2 ± 4.7 |
| PE | 37.1 ± 7.0 | 41.4 ± 6.5 | 39.09 ± 5.7 | 37.1 ± 5.5 | 4.2 ± 5.2 | −1.9 ± 4.8 |
| SL | 19.63 ± 2.3 | 21.4 ± 1.7 | 18.5 ± 1.9 | 19.7 ± 2.5 | 1.7 ± 2.2 | 1.2 ± 2.2 |
Repeated measures ANOVA p > 0.05, NE: Negative emotion; PE, Positive emotion; SL; Satisfaction with Life.