Literature DB >> 31251066

Observation of Coexistence of Yu-Shiba-Rusinov States and Spin-Flip Excitations.

Shawulienu Kezilebieke1, Rok Žitko2,3, Marc Dvorak1, Teemu Ojanen1,4, Peter Liljeroth1.   

Abstract

We investigate the spectral evolution in different metal phthalocyanine molecules on NbSe2 surface using scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) as a function of the coupling with the substrate. For manganese phthalocyanine (MnPc), we demonstrate a smooth spectral crossover from Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) bound states to spin-flip excitations. This has not been observed previously and it is in contrast to simple theoretical expectations. We corroborate the experimental findings using numerical renormalization group calculations. Our results provide fundamental new insight on the behavior of atomic scale magnetic/SC hybrid systems, which is important, for example, for engineered topological superconductors and spin logic devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic impurity; Yu-Shiba-Rusinov state; scanning tunneling microscopy (STM); spin-flip excitation; superconductor

Year:  2019        PMID: 31251066      PMCID: PMC6628613          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


Precise control of the properties of magnetic impurities on surfaces, such as the spin state and magnetic anisotropy, is one of the ultimate goals in fabricating atomic or molecular scale devices for data storage or computing purposes. However, the properties of magnetic impurities are strongly influenced by the atomic environment. In the extreme case, the interactions with the environment (substrate) can create entirely new electronic states, such as the Kondo effect,[1−3] or the formation of Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) bound states on superconductors.[4−8] YSR states have received intense interest as it has become possible to create artificial designer structures, where the interaction between the YSR states gives rise to Majorana modes.[9−16] The YSR states are very sensitive to the immediate environment of the impurity spin and give information on the role of the local environment on the exchange interaction J of an impurity spin with a superconductor.[3,7,12,15−27] The bulk of recent experimental work on YSR states on superconducting (SC) substrates has demonstrated that the strength of the exchange interaction J can be significantly influenced by a small change in the adsorption site of the impurity or by spacers between the impurity and substrate.[3,18,24−32] Figure a illustrates how the exchange coupling J with the substrate competes with the superconducting (SC) pairing energy Δ. The interaction of the local spin with the Cooper pairs gives rise to a low-lying excited state within the gap of the quasiparticle excitation spectrum.[4−8] When J is decreased, the direct interaction of the local spin with the Cooper pairs is reduced and the YSR states merge with the SC coherence peaks. In the simplified theory by Yu, Shiba, and Rusinov, the position of the YSR state is EYSR = Δ(1 – α2)/(1 + α2) with α proportional to J, α = πρJS/2, where ρ is the normal-state density of states of the substrate at the Fermi level and S is the impurity spin. The bound state results from the spin-dependent scattering of Bogoliubov quasiparticles on the impurity and is thus associated with the longitudinal part of the exchange interaction, JSs, where s represents the spin-density of the substrate electrons at the impurity position. Furthermore, internal spin transitions in combination with magnetic anisotropy can give rise to symmetric features with respect to EF outside the superconducting gap (Figure b).[18,30,33−38] These are associated with the spin-flip (SF) events, whereby the spin projection changes by ±1.[33,37,38] The renormalization of the magnetic anisotropy, associated with the transverse part of the exchange interaction J(S+s– + S–s+), approximately follows a Deff = D0[1 – β(ρJ)2 + ···] dependence. In the simple picture, the relative magnitudes of these two channels (YSR and spin-flip) are not constrained and, in principle, both of these effects should be observed simultaneously.[39,40] Although both YSR states and spin-flip excitations have been observed on the same experimental system, where the exchange coupling is changed by the adsorption site of the magnetic impurity,[22] they have not been observed simultaneously in a single configuration. This suggests that the complete picture of the interplay between these two effects is more complicated, requiring a full many-body treatment of the quantum mechanical spin degree of freedom interacting with a (gapped) continuum of electrons.
Figure 1

(a) Impurity spin is exchange coupled (strength J) to the superconducting substrate (gap Δ). (b) Impurity induces pairs of bound states symmetric with respect to EF within the gap of the quasiparticle excitation spectrum (black curve, states marked with YSR). Even at vanishing J, for impurities with S ≥ 1, the internal spin degrees of freedom can result in symmetric features with respect to EF outside the SC gap (red curve, spin-flip (SF) excitations). (c) Topographic STM images of the molecules used in this study (imaging set-point 0.5 V/2 pA). Inset: Schematic of a MPc molecule.

(a) Impurity spin is exchange coupled (strength J) to the superconducting substrate (gap Δ). (b) Impurity induces pairs of bound states symmetric with respect to EF within the gap of the quasiparticle excitation spectrum (black curve, states marked with YSR). Even at vanishing J, for impurities with S ≥ 1, the internal spin degrees of freedom can result in symmetric features with respect to EF outside the SC gap (red curve, spin-flip (SF) excitations). (c) Topographic STM images of the molecules used in this study (imaging set-point 0.5 V/2 pA). Inset: Schematic of a MPc molecule. Here, we experimentally demonstrate smooth crossover from YSR states to spin-flip excitations in metal phthalocyanine molecules (MPcs) on NbSe2 surface. Using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), we tune the exchange coupling strength J and follow the spectral evolution from the YSR states to intrinsic quantum spin states characterized by well-developed spin-flip excitations. Our results provide detailed understanding of the low-energy quantum states in magnetic/SC hybrid systems and could have significant ramifications for the design and control of atomic-scale magnetic devices. Figure c shows topographic STM images of isolated MPc molecules on NbSe2; see Supporting Information (SI) for details. Their topographic appearance already reflects differences that allow us to classify them into two groups: the metal ion appears as a protrusion in FePc, CoPc, and MnPc and as a depression in CuPc depending on the coupling of the out of plane d-orbitals with the tip states.[41,42] We characterize the spin states of different MPcs by recording differential conductance spectra (dI/dV curves) with an SC tip (Figure a). For CoPc and MnPc, there are two peaks at symmetric bias voltages within the SC gap. These subgap peaks are due to the formation of YSR states and indicate a sizable magnetic interaction with the SC substrate caused by an unpaired spin in the -orbital (see Figure b for the spin states of the molecules). This orbital is subject to strong coupling with the electronic states of the substrate due to its symmetry, while the spins on the d- and -orbitals are expected to be only weakly coupled.[42,43] The dI/dV curve taken on CuPc shows an unperturbed SC gap of NbSe2 due to the absence of unpaired spin in the orbital (Figure b). As an S = 1/2 system, CuPc is also not expected to show any spin-flip excitations.
Figure 2

(a) Differential conductance spectra (dI/dV) recorded over the center of the different MPcs with a SC tip. The YSR states and spin-flip (SF) excitations are marked. Gray dotted arrows mark transitions due thermal excitation of carriers across the SC gap.[3] (b) The ground state spin configurations of the different MPcs. For FePc, we show two possible spin configurations (having similar energy). (c) Illustration of the different d-orbital symmetries.

(a) Differential conductance spectra (dI/dV) recorded over the center of the different MPcs with a SC tip. The YSR states and spin-flip (SF) excitations are marked. Gray dotted arrows mark transitions due thermal excitation of carriers across the SC gap.[3] (b) The ground state spin configurations of the different MPcs. For FePc, we show two possible spin configurations (having similar energy). (c) Illustration of the different d-orbital symmetries. Although the dI/dV curves taken on FePc do not show YSR states, there are remarkable features outside the SC gap. Their symmetric appearance points to inelastic excitations.[33,44,45] Interestingly, unlike in the previous studies that required decoupling the magnetic molecules using an extra organic ligand as a spacer,[18,30] we observe these signals already when the molecule is directly adsorbed on the SC substrate. Because FePc is also expected to have a dominant -character, the molecule–substrate interaction should be similar to CoPc and MnPc. The surprising absence of YSR states on FePc suggests that the magnetic interaction with the SC substrate is actually weak, which would be at odds with an unpaired spin occupying a -orbital. FePc has spin triplet S = 1 electronic ground state and DFT calculations suggest that FePc on NbSe2 has the same spin as in the gas phase (SI for details). Two different spin-configurations separated by 80 meV have been proposed as the ground state[46,47] (Figure b). The absence of YSR states is consistent with the predicted lower energy configuration with two electrons on the -orbital.[46] This ground state spin configuration can be altered by slight differences in the molecular ligand field or the interaction with the substrate as shown by YSR states observed on a related iron porphyrin molecule on Pb(111) substrate.[31] We have verified that the observed transitions result from inelastic spin excitations by acquiring the dI/dV spectra under an external magnetic field (B) perpendicular to the sample surface (see SI for details). The B-field dependence of the energies of the first and second feature is consistent with S = 1 with transverse anisotropy. Fitting the data with a phenomenological spin Hamiltonian Heff = gμBBSγ + DS2+E(S2 – S2), where g is the Landé g factor, μB is the Bohr magneton, and Sγ is the spin component along the field direction, we obtain D = 5.5 meV and E = 1.4 meV indicating easy-plane magnetic anisotropy. The positive value of D is comparable to the bulk value (in contrast to the measurements on oxidized Cu(110) surface giving D < 0).[47,48] The exchange coupling between the magnetic impurity and the substrate can be modulated by changing the adsorption site of the molecule.[3,18,28−30,49,50] We successfully positioned CoPc and FePc molecules on different adsorption sites through STM manipulation (SI Figure S3), which affects the energy positions of both the YSR states and the inelastic features. On CoPC, the YSR states can even change between particle- or hole-like character depending on the adsorption site, similarly to the reported results on MnPc adsorbed on Pb(111).[28] On FePc, adsorption site causes variations of E and D with typical values in the range of 1.2–2.7 and 4.2–9.0 meV, respectively. Because of the sensitivity of the YSR states and spin-excitations, they can be tuned continuously by the force exerted by the STM tip.[31,32,51] We expect to have attractive forces between the tip and the molecule;[52,53] this would result in pulling the molecule away from the substrate and reduction of the exchange coupling between the molecule and the substrate upon decreasing the tip–molecule distance. Figure shows a series of tunneling spectra measured at different tip–sample distances above the central ion of the MPc molecule. The dI/dV spectra on a CoPc molecule, Figure a, show a shift of the YSR resonances toward higher bias. At zoffset ≈ 60 pm, the YSR resonances have merged with the SC coherence peaks at the gap edge. The dI/dV spectra on MnPc (Figure b) also show a clear shift of the YSR resonance toward the SC gap edge. At zoffset ≈ 240 pm, as the YSR resonance is merging with the SC coherence peak, a new symmetric pair of peaks is emerging outside the gap (marked with *). Finally, on FePc (Figure c), the two spin excitation energies monotonously increase with decreasing tip–sample distance. These variations in the YSR and spin excitations states of the MPc molecules are caused by the interaction of the STM tip causing the metal ion to be pulled toward the STM tip.[31,32,51] This has the largest effect on the out-of-plane d-orbitals (d and ), where the overlap with the substrate wave function will be strongly affected.
Figure 3

Normalized dI/dV spectra recorded over CoPc (set-point V = 20 mV, I = 300 pA) (a), MnPc (set-point V = 20 mV, I = 200 pA) (b), and FePc (set-point V = 50 mV, I = 200pA) (c) at different tip–sample distances from far (bottom) to close (top). Initial tip–sample distance given by the set-point conditions, then the tip is approached by a distance of zoffset indicated in the figure (values in pm).

Normalized dI/dV spectra recorded over CoPc (set-point V = 20 mV, I = 300 pA) (a), MnPc (set-point V = 20 mV, I = 200 pA) (b), and FePc (set-point V = 50 mV, I = 200pA) (c) at different tip–sample distances from far (bottom) to close (top). Initial tip–sample distance given by the set-point conditions, then the tip is approached by a distance of zoffset indicated in the figure (values in pm). With CoPc (S = 1/2), the interaction with the tip reduces the coupling between the -orbital and the NbSe2 and the YSR states move to the SC coherence peaks (J decreases) (Figure a). With FePc (S = 1), in addition to modifying the exchange coupling J, the tip–sample interaction might also affect the energies of the d-orbitals slightly. This causes the bare magnetic anisotropy D0, which is an admixture of low-lying excited states of the molecules,[54] to be directly affected by the tip–sample distance. In this system, it is not possible to distinguish whether the effective anisotropy Deff changes dominantly through the variation of D0 or J. With MnPc (S = 3/2), the coupling strength J decreases as the tip–sample distance decreases leading to the migration of the YSR states toward the SC gap edge and the recovery of the SC coherence peaks. When the YSR peaks are close to the gap edges, the spectra also show new symmetric features outside the gap, which are due to spin–flip excitations. In MnPc, at zero external magnetic field the axial magnetic anisotropy splits the spin states Ms = ±1/2 and M = ±3/2 by an energy separation of 2D, which corresponds to the observed spin excitation. This gives D ≈ 0.7 meV, which is close to the bulk value[55] (more detailed analysis below). There could also be inelastic excitations in this energy range corresponding to molecular vibrations (phonons). We can rule this out by experiments under an external magnetic field which also indicate a positive value of D > 0 (see SI for details). Conventional picture of the YSR states and spin-flip excitations neglecting quantum fluctuations does not predict a crossover behavior from the YSR states to spin-excitations. These conduction channels should be independent and readily observable at the same time. To resolve this disagreement with our experimental results, we describe the magnetic impurity by a multiorbital Anderson model for the relevant d-shell orbitals.[56] This can be reduced in a given charge state to an effective model that takes the form of a Kondo Hamiltonian with the spin degree of freedom, S, only[57,58] (see SI for details). Since the total spin operator has contributions from all d-orbitals, it is in general exchange coupled to different symmetry-adapted combinations of states from the substrate with different values of Kondo coupling strength, J. These differences are due to the unequal orbital energies and hybridization strengths. Only those J that are sufficiently large need to be retained; in the problems considered here, a single orbital is always strongly dominant, as evidenced by the presence of a single pair of subgap YSR peaks. We also take into account the spin–orbit coupling that leads through orbital excitations to residual magnetic-anisotropy terms. We solve the resulting single-channel anisotropic Kondo model with high spin S using the numerical renormalization group (NRG) method giving a numerically exact solution.[59−61] Figure a shows the calculated spectral functions as a function of the exchange coupling for a magnetic impurity with S = 3/2 (e.g., MnPc). In the absence of anisotropy (D = E = 0), the binding of a Bogoliubov quasiparticle would lead to an emergence of a YSR bound state with the spin reduced by 1/2 (YSR screening from S = 3/2 to S = 1), giving rise to a single pair of YSR peaks. The phenomenology in the isotropic case is similar to that in the classical model, where the impurity is described as a static local magnetic field that binds Bogoliubov quasiparticles of the opposite spin direction. The many-body character of the subgap states is, however, revealed in the presence of magnetic anisotropy, which leads to the splitting of the subgap S = 1 multiplet into the low-energy |S = 0⟩ state and the high-energy (1/2)(|S = 1⟩ ± |S=–1⟩) states.[62] For D ≪ Δ, such splitting is directly observable.[28] When the anisotropy is large, as is the case here, the high-energy states are pushed instead into the continuum and only the |S = 0⟩ subgap state is observable. Furthermore, one finds additional features outside the gap that are related to the transitions within the unscreened S = 3/2 multiplet.[18] These spectral steps correspond to the spin-flip excitations, similar to the those in systems with normal-state substrates.[35,63] The exchange coupling to the substrate determines the energy shift as well as the lifetime broadening of the excited states.[18,64] We model NbSe2 as a soft-gap superconductor with a small but finite concentration of subgap states, hence the excited spin states have even for ωsf = 2D < 2Δ relatively short lifetimes compared to hard-gap superconductors, because the dominant decay channel (emission of particle-hole excitations) is here open. For this reason, a finite value of J leads to significant broadening of the spin-flip excitations. It is difficult to resolve both spectral features, considering the required magnitude of J for the YSR states to be visibly separated from the gap edges.
Figure 4

(a) Theoretical spectral functions for a magnetic impurity (S = 3/2) on a superconductor with varying exchange coupling J (spectra normalized by the value at high energy). (b) Extracted energies of the YSR resonances (red squares) and the spin-flip excitations (blue circles) from the experiments shown in Figure b. (c) Color-scale plot of the measured tunneling conductance as a function of the exchange coupling ρJ estimated from the energies of the YSR resonances (area inside the white rectangle is shown in enhanced contrast). (d) Comparison between the experimental Deff (symbols) and the calculated values (solid lines with D0/Δ = 0.6–1.0) scaled by the SC gap Δ as a function of the exchange coupling with the substrate. (e) Extracted experimental values (blue circles) and calculation results (black line) of the amplitude of the spin-flip transition as a function of the exchange coupling with the substrate.

(a) Theoretical spectral functions for a magnetic impurity (S = 3/2) on a superconductor with varying exchange coupling J (spectra normalized by the value at high energy). (b) Extracted energies of the YSR resonances (red squares) and the spin-flip excitations (blue circles) from the experiments shown in Figure b. (c) Color-scale plot of the measured tunneling conductance as a function of the exchange coupling ρJ estimated from the energies of the YSR resonances (area inside the white rectangle is shown in enhanced contrast). (d) Comparison between the experimental Deff (symbols) and the calculated values (solid lines with D0/Δ = 0.6–1.0) scaled by the SC gap Δ as a function of the exchange coupling with the substrate. (e) Extracted experimental values (blue circles) and calculation results (black line) of the amplitude of the spin-flip transition as a function of the exchange coupling with the substrate. The theory curves in Figure a can be compared with the experiments shown in Figure b. The energies of the YSR peaks and spin-flip excitations extracted from the experimental results are shown in Figure b (the SC gap of the tip has been subtracted). At small values of zoffset < 200 pm, only the YSR resonances are visible. As the tip is approached further, the YSR peaks merge with SC gap edges and spin-flip features emerge at a bias voltage between 3 and 4 mV. We can estimate the exchange coupling with the substrate by comparing the theoretical and experimental YSR energies (SI Figure S8). This allows us to convert set-point zoffset to an effective exchange coupling at that tip–molecule separation. The experimental data is replotted as a function of ρJ in Figure c, which can be directly compared with Figure a (note that the bias axis in Figure c still contains the offset due to the superconducting gap of the tip). We can also plot the renormalized (effective) magnetic anisotropy Deff and the intensity of the spin-flip transitions as a function of the estimated ρJ (Figures d,e). This is possible as the energy of the YSR state depends only very weakly on the precise value of D in the experimentally relevant range (SI Figure S8). The comparison with theoretical results (solid lines in Figure d) yields a value of D0/Δ ∼ 0.7 for the nonrenormalized (bare) value of the magnetic anisotropy. The experimental values actually deviate from the theoretical trend expected for a fixed value of D0. This is the case for all couplings J but more particularly for small J, which corresponds to the largest tip–molecule interaction in the experiment. It is likely that the interaction with the tip distorts the molecular geometry or induces charge transfer with the metal ion resulting in a change in D0. The presence of the YSR resonances thus allows us to disentangle the two contributions to the variation of Deff. The extracted value D0 as a function of the tip–sample distance is plotted in the SI Figure S9. The intensity of the spin-flip transition (Figure e) shows a monotonous decrease with increasing J (except the first two points, where the reason is again likely to be the tip–molecule interaction). The value at low J is close to the theoretically expected value of 0.4 for pure spin-flip excitations on a normal metal substrate (see SI Figure S10 for details).[37,38] Comparing the experimental values with the theoretical predictions again highlights the strong correspondence between theory and experiments. In conclusion, we have demonstrated coexistence and a smooth evolution from the YSR states to spin-flip transitions in MnPc molecules as the coupling with the NbSe2 substrate is reduced. The excitation energies reveal a significant renormalization of the anisotropy by the exchange coupling and it has a strong effect on the excited spin lifetime. The spin-flip excitations are broadened and washed out at higher values of J making simultaneous detection with the YSR states difficult. Our results provide fundamental new insight on the behavior of atomic scale magnetic/SC hybrid systems. This is important, for example, for the design of engineered topological superconductors consisting of magnetic atoms on SC substrates[9,16,65] and achieving long spin life- and coherence times in spin logic devices.[66−68]
  37 in total

1.  Interplay of conductance, force, and structural change in metallic point contacts.

Authors:  Markus Ternes; César González; Christopher P Lutz; Prokop Hapala; Franz J Giessibl; Pavel Jelínek; Andreas J Heinrich
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Tuning the Magnetic Anisotropy of Single Molecules.

Authors:  Benjamin W Heinrich; Lukas Braun; Jose I Pascual; Katharina J Franke
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 11.189

3.  Proximity-Induced Shiba States in a Molecular Junction.

Authors:  Joshua O Island; Rocco Gaudenzi; Joeri de Bruijckere; Enrique Burzurí; Carlos Franco; Marta Mas-Torrent; Concepció Rovira; Jaume Veciana; Teun M Klapwijk; Ramón Aguado; Herre S J van der Zant
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Wave-Function Hybridization in Yu-Shiba-Rusinov Dimers.

Authors:  Michael Ruby; Benjamin W Heinrich; Yang Peng; Felix von Oppen; Katharina J Franke
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Quantitative atomic resolution force imaging on epitaxial graphene with reactive and nonreactive AFM probes.

Authors:  Mark P Boneschanscher; Joost van der Lit; Zhixiang Sun; Ingmar Swart; Peter Liljeroth; Daniël Vanmaekelbergh
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Tunable Spin-Superconductor Coupling of Spin 1/2 Vanadyl Phthalocyanine Molecules.

Authors:  Luigi Malavolti; Matteo Briganti; Max Hänze; Giulia Serrano; Irene Cimatti; Gregory McMurtrie; Edwige Otero; Philippe Ohresser; Federico Totti; Matteo Mannini; Roberta Sessoli; Sebastian Loth
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Adsorption-induced switching of magnetic anisotropy in a single iron(II) phthalocyanine molecule on an oxidized Cu(110) surface.

Authors:  Noriyuki Tsukahara; Ken-Ichi Noto; Michiaki Ohara; Susumu Shiraki; Noriaki Takagi; Yasutaka Takata; Jun Miyawaki; Munetaka Taguchi; Ashish Chainani; Shik Shin; Maki Kawai
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Relevance of hybridization and filling of 3d orbitals for the Kondo effect in transition metal phthalocyanines.

Authors:  Jens Kügel; Michael Karolak; Jacob Senkpiel; Pin-Jui Hsu; Giorgio Sangiovanni; Matthias Bode
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Scaling of Yu-Shiba-Rusinov energies in the weak-coupling Kondo regime.

Authors:  Nino Hatter; Benjamin W Heinrich; Daniela Rolf; Katharina J Franke
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Exploring a Proximity-Coupled Co Chain on Pb(110) as a Possible Majorana Platform.

Authors:  Michael Ruby; Benjamin W Heinrich; Yang Peng; Felix von Oppen; Katharina J Franke
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 11.189

View more
  3 in total

1.  Correlating Josephson supercurrents and Shiba states in quantum spins unconventionally coupled to superconductors.

Authors:  Felix Küster; Ana M Montero; Filipe S M Guimarães; Sascha Brinker; Samir Lounis; Stuart S P Parkin; Paolo Sessi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Observation of Yu-Shiba-Rusinov States and Inelastic Tunneling Spectroscopy for Intramolecule Magnetic Exchange Interaction Energy of Terbium Phthalocyanine (TbPc) Species Adsorbed on Superconductor NbSe2.

Authors:  Syed Mohammad Fakruddin Shahed; Ferdous Ara; Mohammad Ikram Hossain; Keiichi Katoh; Masahiro Yamashita; Tadahiro Komeda
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 18.027

3.  Subgap dynamics of double quantum dot coupled between superconducting and normal leads.

Authors:  B Baran; R Taranko; T Domański
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.