Literature DB >> 31248325

Tamoxifen administration in pregnant mice can be deleterious to both mother and embryo.

Nikita Ved1, Angela Curran2, Frances Mary Ashcroft1, Duncan Burnaby Sparrow1.   

Abstract

Since it was introduced 20 years ago, tamoxifen-inducible genetic recombination in vivo has become a standard tool in many fields. This technique has great utility, allowing precise temporal and spatial gene recombination mediated by expression of a Cre recombinase-oestrogen receptor hormone binding domain fusion protein. It is frequently used in developmental biology, either for accurate spatio-temporal gene deletion or for lineage-labelling. Administration of high doses of tamoxifen can rapidly induce abortion in pregnant mice but this can be partially overcome by progesterone co-administration. However, administration of tamoxifen to pregnant mice early in pregnancy may have potentially lethal effects on the mother independently of abortion, and can also severely perturb embryonic development. Despite this, only a few published studies mention this fact in passing, and standard parameters for successful or unsuccessful use of tamoxifen in pregnant mice have not been reported. Therefore, in the interests of providing a framework for more humane animal research, we describe our experiences of tamoxifen administration during early gestation in mice. These observations should assist the design of future studies in accordance with the principles of the three Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of Animals in Research).

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs; ethics and welfare; experimental design; genetics; laboratory animal welfare; organisms and models; rodents; techniques

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31248325      PMCID: PMC6900213          DOI: 10.1177/0023677219856918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


Six female mice of the Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(Kcnj11*V59M)Fmas mouse strain[1] were mated with male C57BL6/J mice (Charles River Laboratories, Margate, UK). Five to seven days after plugging, the pregnant females were injected subcutaneously into the scruff on one occasion with a single dose of 10–200 mg/kg tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK) dissolved in corn oil (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK; see Table 1 for study design). Tamoxifen is metabolized in vivo to 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen, which acts as an antagonist of the oestrogen receptor. In research, it can also be used to conditionally activate the Cre-ERT2 fusion protein to cause conditional genomic recombination. In this study, the mice did not carry a Cre-ERT2 allele, so tamoxifen treatment would have no effect on the maternal genome. These mice were derived from a colony that had been backcrossed for more than 10 generations onto the C57BL/6J background. They were housed in a specific-pathogen-free facility free from the major rodent pathogens except Helicobacter hepaticus, with a 12:12 h light:dark cycle, at 19–23℃, 55% ± 10% humidity, in individually-ventilated cages (Tecniplast UK Ltd, Rushden, UK) containing Grade 4 Aspen Chip bedding (Datesand Ltd, Manchester, UK), cardboard tunnels and Sizzle Pet nesting material (LBS Biotechnology, Horley, UK), with free access to Teklad 2916 mouse chow (Envigo, Huntingdon, UK) and tap water. Bedding was changed fortnightly, and animals were assessed daily for welfare. Injections took place in the morning in a flow hood, and mice were immediately returned to their home cage after injection. Unexpectedly, all (6/6) mice developed severe intrauterine haemorrhage 7–9 days post-injection, and 3/6 had to be euthanized as a humane endpoint for ethical reasons 1–3 days prior to the planned embryo harvest date on day E15.5 (Figure 1 and Table 1). The three animals euthanized early had been dosed with 200 mg/kg on E5.5, 100 mg/kg on E7.5 and 10 mg/kg on E5.5, respectively. This effect was apparent at a range of doses commonly used in the literature to activate the tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase (10–200 mg/kg). We compared the effects of unmated mice of the same strain and genotype injected subcutaneously with a single dose of 200 mg/kg tamoxifen. These mice were controls from another study. All control mice (104/104) survived without any deleterious effects up to 14 weeks post injection (Figure 1). This was highly statistically significant (p < 0.0001, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test comparing 6/6 injected pregnant mice with 0/104 injected non-pregnant mice). There is some evidence suggesting that tamoxifen dosage by oral gavage may be less toxic to pregnant mice.[2] We therefore treated a further two pregnant mice with 100 mg/kg tamoxifen by oral gavage on E5.5 or E7.5. Both mice also suffered intrauterine haemorrhage 8–9 days after treatment, with one of these being found dead the day before the planned embryo harvest date of E15.5 (p = 0.0002, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test comparing 2/2 gavaged mice with 0/104 control injected mice). Therefore, we conclude that even tamoxifen administered via oral gavage might be indirectly toxic to pregnant mice if given early in pregnancy.
Table 1.

Deleterious effects including intrauterine haemorrhage in the mother and morphological defects in the embryo were seen in the majority of mice, irrespective of tamoxifen dose. Morphological defects included: necrotic embryos, pericardial oedema (PCO), cranial neural tube defects (cNTD) such as exencephaly, craniofacial defects (CFD) including cleft palate, subcutaneous oedema (SCO) and ophthalmic defects (Oph) including microphthalmia or anophthalmia.

Mouse numberTamoxifen dose (mg/kg)Administration routeDay treatedDay euthanizedUterine haemorrhageEmbryo phenotype
Embryonic defects
NormalAbnormal
1200SubcutaneousE5.5E15.5Severe00Litter resorbed
2200SubcutaneousE5.5E12.5 (early)Severe09Necrotic, PCO, cNTD, CFD
3100SubcutaneousE7.5E14.5 (early)Severe08PCO, CFD
450SubcutaneousE7.5E15.5Mild91Subcutaneous haemorrhage
550SubcutaneousE5.5E15.5Severe06Necrotic, PCO, cNTD, CFD
610SubcutaneousE5.5E14.5Severeo10Necrotic, SCO, Oph
7100GavageE7.5E15.5Mild61Subcutaneous haemorrhage
8100GavageE5.5E14.5 (found dead)Severe07Necrotic, PCO, cNTD, CFD
90SubcutaneousE7.5E15.5None50N/A
100SubcutaneousE5.5E15.5None80N/A
110SubcutaneousE5.5E15.5None90N/A
Figure 1.

Tamoxifen-injected pregnant mice started showing signs of severe distress 5–7 days post tamoxifen injection and were euthanized as a humane end-point. By contrast, tamoxifen-injected non-pregnant females showed no effects for at least 100 days post-injection.

Tamoxifen-injected pregnant mice started showing signs of severe distress 5–7 days post tamoxifen injection and were euthanized as a humane end-point. By contrast, tamoxifen-injected non-pregnant females showed no effects for at least 100 days post-injection. Deleterious effects including intrauterine haemorrhage in the mother and morphological defects in the embryo were seen in the majority of mice, irrespective of tamoxifen dose. Morphological defects included: necrotic embryos, pericardial oedema (PCO), cranial neural tube defects (cNTD) such as exencephaly, craniofacial defects (CFD) including cleft palate, subcutaneous oedema (SCO) and ophthalmic defects (Oph) including microphthalmia or anophthalmia. An extensive search of the literature for other examples of maternal tamoxifen toxicity found only a single specific reference to intrauterine haemorrhage resulting from tamoxifen administration.[2] In this case it occurred in 4/5 mice gavaged with 120 mg/kg on E6.5, haemorrhage was only apparent 12 days post-injection, and there were no apparent effects on the embryos. All other studies focused on reduced litter survival after tamoxifen administration, but not maternal health.[3-6] In addition to maternal toxicity, we also found that maternal tamoxifen treatment had a teratogenic effect on embryos. We collected all embryos from the six subcutaneously injected and two gavaged mothers. The majority of these embryos showed abnormal development (42/57) compared with controls from three litters of mothers injected with corn oil alone (0/22, p < 0.0001, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test). A wide range of defects were observed, including pericardial and subcutaneous oedema, craniofacial defects, micro-ophthalmia and necrosis. In addition, one litter was completely resorbed (see Table 1). Interestingly, the two litters from mothers with mild uterine haemorrhage had the lowest rate of abnormal embryos. None of these embryos carried a Cre recombinase allele, and therefore we conclude that the observed embryonic defects were either a direct result of tamoxifen exposure or an indirect consequence of maternal uterine dysfunction. Clinically, it is well known that tamoxifen therapy for the treatment of early-stage hormone-sensitive breast cancer in humans is contraindicated in pregnancy. AstraZeneca reported congenital anomalies in live births from mothers undergoing tamoxifen therapy during pregnancy, particularly when administered in the first trimester.[7] Tamoxifen administration in vivo during pregnancy has been linked to impaired placental development and vascular dysfunction resulting in increased embryonic anomalies and embryonic death in rat.[8] In summary, we believe that although tamoxifen administration during mouse pregnancy is a useful tool for precision alteration of gene expression in the study of mouse embryonic development, it can be harmful to the pregnant mouse if administered too early in gestation. Therefore, we suggest that to comply with the principles of the three Rs,[9] future studies using tamoxifen administration to female mice early in pregnancy should proceed with caution.
  8 in total

1.  Kinetics of tamoxifen-regulated Cre activity in mice using a cartilage-specific CreER(T) to assay temporal activity windows along the proximodistal limb skeleton.

Authors:  Eiichiro Nakamura; Minh-Thanh Nguyen; Susan Mackem
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.780

2.  Site- and time-specific gene targeting in the mouse.

Authors:  D Metzger; P Chambon
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 3.  Use of tamoxifen before and during pregnancy.

Authors:  Geert Braems; Hannelore Denys; Olivier De Wever; Veronique Cocquyt; Rudy Van den Broecke
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-10-21

4.  Lhx2 selector activity specifies cortical identity and suppresses hippocampal organizer fate.

Authors:  Vishakha S Mangale; Karla E Hirokawa; Prasad R V Satyaki; Nandini Gokulchandran; Satyadeep Chikbire; Lakshmi Subramanian; Ashwin S Shetty; Ben Martynoga; Jolly Paul; Mark V Mai; Yuqing Li; Lisa A Flanagan; Shubha Tole; Edwin S Monuki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  System for tamoxifen-inducible expression of cre-recombinase from the Foxa2 locus in mice.

Authors:  Eon Joo Park; Xiaoxia Sun; Peter Nichol; Yukio Saijoh; James F Martin; Anne M Moon
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.780

6.  Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase.

Authors:  P S Danielian; D Muccino; D H Rowitch; S K Michael; A P McMahon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The effects of the antihormones RU486 and tamoxifen on fetoplacental development and placental bed vascularisation in the rat: a model for intrauterine fetal growth retardation.

Authors:  S Sadek; S C Bell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-07

8.  Reversible changes in pancreatic islet structure and function produced by elevated blood glucose.

Authors:  Melissa F Brereton; Michaela Iberl; Kenju Shimomura; Quan Zhang; Alice E Adriaenssens; Peter Proks; Ioannis I Spiliotis; William Dace; Katia K Mattis; Reshma Ramracheya; Fiona M Gribble; Frank Reimann; Anne Clark; Patrik Rorsman; Frances M Ashcroft
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Ins1-Cre and Ins1-CreER Gene Replacement Alleles Are Susceptible To Silencing By DNA Hypermethylation.

Authors:  Elham Mosleh; Kristy Ou; Matthew W Haemmerle; Teguru Tembo; Andrew Yuhas; Bethany A Carboneau; Shannon E Townsend; Karin J Bosma; Maureen Gannon; Richard M O'Brien; Doris A Stoffers; Maria L Golson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  Fate-mapping mice: new tools and technology for immune discovery.

Authors:  Scarlett E Lee; Brian D Rudd; Norah L Smith
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 3.  Determining lineage relationships in kidney development and disease.

Authors:  Melissa H Little; Sara E Howden; Kynan T Lawlor; Jessica M Vanslambrouck
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Rapid and efficient degradation of endogenous proteins in vivo identifies stage-specific roles of RNA Pol II pausing in mammalian development.

Authors:  Abderhman Abuhashem; Andrew S Lee; Alexandra L Joyner; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 13.417

Review 5.  Got Milk? Identifying and Characterizing Lactation Defects in Genetically-Engineered Mouse Models.

Authors:  Teneale A Stewart; Felicity M Davis
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 6.  Mechanisms and cell lineages in lymphatic vascular development.

Authors:  Daniyal J Jafree; David A Long; Peter J Scambler; Christiana Ruhrberg
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 9.596

7.  A novel Axin2 knock-in mouse model for visualization and lineage tracing of WNT/CTNNB1 responsive cells.

Authors:  Anoeska Agatha Alida van de Moosdijk; Yorick Bernardus Cornelis van de Grift; Saskia Madelon Ada de Man; Amber Lisanne Zeeman; Renée van Amerongen
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Cell non-autonomy amplifies disruption of neurulation by mosaic Vangl2 deletion in mice.

Authors:  Gabriel L Galea; Eirini Maniou; Timothy J Edwards; Abigail R Marshall; Ioakeim Ampartzidis; Nicholas D E Greene; Andrew J Copp
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Cell Type-specific Knockout with Gli1-mediated Cre Recombination in the Developing Cerebellum.

Authors:  Jung-Mi Choi; Rakshya Acharya; Subash Marasini; Bashyal Narayan; Kwang-Wook Lee; Woo Sup Hwang; Da-Young Chang; Sung-Soo Kim; Haeyoung Suh-Kim
Journal:  Exp Neurobiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.261

10.  Refinement of inducible gene deletion in embryos of pregnant mice.

Authors:  Dawn Savery; Eirini Maniou; Lucy H Culshaw; Nicholas D E Greene; Andrew J Copp; Gabriel L Galea
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.