Literature DB >> 35094945

Fate-mapping mice: new tools and technology for immune discovery.

Scarlett E Lee1, Brian D Rudd1, Norah L Smith2.   

Abstract

The fate-mapping mouse has become an essential tool in the immunologist's toolbox. Although traditionally used by developmental biologists to trace the origins of cells, immunologists are turning to fate-mapping to better understand the development and function of immune cells. Thus, an expansion in the variety of fate-mapping mouse models has occurred to answer fundamental questions about the immune system. These models are also being combined with new genetic tools to study cancer, infection, and autoimmunity. In this review, we summarize different types of fate-mapping mice and describe emerging technologies that might allow immunologists to leverage this valuable tool and expand our functional knowledge of the immune system.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cre-loxP; fate mapping; immune development; lineage tracing; mouse models

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35094945      PMCID: PMC8882138          DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2022.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Immunol        ISSN: 1471-4906            Impact factor:   16.687


  129 in total

1.  KLRG1+ Effector CD8+ T Cells Lose KLRG1, Differentiate into All Memory T Cell Lineages, and Convey Enhanced Protective Immunity.

Authors:  Dietmar Herndler-Brandstetter; Harumichi Ishigame; Ryo Shinnakasu; Valerie Plajer; Carmen Stecher; Jun Zhao; Melanie Lietzenmayer; Lina Kroehling; Akiko Takumi; Kohei Kometani; Takeshi Inoue; Yuval Kluger; Susan M Kaech; Tomohiro Kurosaki; Takaharu Okada; Richard A Flavell
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 31.745

2.  Fate mapping reveals the age structure of the peripheral T cell compartment.

Authors:  Arnold Reynaldi; Norah L Smith; Timothy E Schlub; Cybelle Tabilas; Vanessa Venturi; Brian D Rudd; Miles P Davenport
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Temporally-controlled site-specific mutagenesis in the basal layer of the epidermis: comparison of the recombinase activity of the tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ER(T) and Cre-ER(T2) recombinases.

Authors:  A K Indra; X Warot; J Brocard; J M Bornert; J H Xiao; P Chambon; D Metzger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Stepwise chromatin and transcriptional acquisition of an intraepithelial lymphocyte program.

Authors:  Mariya London; Angelina M Bilate; Tiago B R Castro; Tomohisa Sujino; Daniel Mucida
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Rapid generation of inducible mouse mutants.

Authors:  Jost Seibler; Branko Zevnik; Birgit Küter-Luks; Susanne Andreas; Heidrun Kern; Thomas Hennek; Anja Rode; Cornelia Heimann; Nicole Faust; Gunther Kauselmann; Michael Schoor; Rudolf Jaenisch; Klaus Rajewsky; Ralf Kühn; Frieder Schwenk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Brief homogeneous TCR signals instruct common iNKT progenitors whose effector diversification is characterized by subsequent cytokine signaling.

Authors:  Sabrina Bortoluzzi; Nyambayar Dashtsoodol; Thomas Engleitner; Christoph Drees; Sabine Helmrath; Jonas Mir; Albulena Toska; Michael Flossdorf; Rupert Öllinger; Maria Solovey; Maria Colomé-Tatché; Bahire Kalfaoglu; Masahiro Ono; Thorsten Buch; Tim Ammon; Roland Rad; Marc Schmidt-Supprian
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 31.745

7.  Determining sequencing depth in a single-cell RNA-seq experiment.

Authors:  Martin Jinye Zhang; Vasilis Ntranos; David Tse
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  A novel Cre recombinase imaging system for tracking lymphotropic virus infection in vivo.

Authors:  Bernadette M Dutia; Stuart J Reid; Derek D Drummond; Yvonne Ligertwood; Ian Bennet; Willard Rietberg; Ondine Silvia; Michael A Jarvis; Anthony A Nash
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Megakaryocyte production is sustained by direct differentiation from erythromyeloid progenitors in the yolk sac until midgestation.

Authors:  Lorea Iturri; Laina Freyer; Anne Biton; Pascal Dardenne; Yvan Lallemand; Elisa Gomez Perdiguero
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 31.745

10.  Yolk-sac-derived macrophages progressively expand in the mouse kidney with age.

Authors:  Shintaro Ide; Yasuhito Yahara; Yoshihiko Kobayashi; Sarah A Strausser; Kana Ide; Anisha Watwe; Shengjie Xu-Vanpala; Jamie R Privratsky; Steven D Crowley; Mari L Shinohara; Benjamin A Alman; Tomokazu Souma
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Divide and Conquer: Phenotypic and Temporal Heterogeneity Within CD8+ T Cell Responses.

Authors:  Arianne C Richard
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Macrophage Fate Mapping.

Authors:  Yingzheng Xu; Patricia R Schrank; Jesse W Williams
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2022-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.