Literature DB >> 31246042

Rey Tangled Line Test: A measure of processing speed in TBI.

Annie-Lori C Joseph1, Hope A Peterson1, Katelyn M Garcia2, Shannon M McNally2, Tracyann K Mburu2, Sara M Lippa1, John Dsurney3, Leighton Chan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological assessment plays a key role in characterizing and detecting cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Rey Tangled Line Test (RTLT), an understudied neuropsychological assessment thought to be capable of detecting visual processing deficits, was examined to determine which cognitive abilities may contribute to performance on the test in participants with a history of TBI.
METHOD: One-hundred participants with a history of mild to severe TBI were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing attention, executive functioning, memory, visual construction, motor functioning, and processing speed between 30 days and 5 years postinjury. An exploratory principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to determine which cognitive tests the RTLT was most highly associated with.
RESULTS: No difference in RTLT latency was present between mild and moderate/severe TBI. The PCA resulted in 5 factors. RTLT latency had a significant primary factor loading on the "processing speed" factor, and a secondary loading on the "motor" factor. Forty-two percent of participants had an impaired latency score.
CONCLUSIONS: RTLT latency appears to measure processing speed, and likely aspects of motor functioning, in our sample. The RTLT may be useful as a rapid assessment in individuals with a history of TBI to detect cognitive deficit before initiating further cognitive testing or rehabilitation efforts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31246042      PMCID: PMC6803037          DOI: 10.1037/rep0000284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rehabil Psychol        ISSN: 0090-5550


  12 in total

1.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Neuropsychological outcome from uncomplicated mild, complicated mild, and moderate traumatic brain injury in US military personnel.

Authors:  Rael T Lange; Tracey A Brickell; Louis M French; Victoria C Merritt; Aditya Bhagwat; Sonal Pancholi; Grant L Iverson
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on serial neuropsychological assessments: the utility and challenges of repeat test administrations in clinical and forensic contexts.

Authors:  Robert L Heilbronner; Jerry J Sweet; Deborah K Attix; Kevin R Krull; George K Henry; Robert P Hart
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Interpreting the trail making test following traumatic brain injury: comparison of traditional time scores and derived indices.

Authors:  Rael T Lange; Grant L Iverson; Martin J Zakrzewski; Patrick E Ethel-King; Michael D Franzen
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.475

Review 5.  Cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Amanda R Rabinowitz; Harvey S Levin
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2014-01-14

6.  Alterations in visually related eye movements following left pulvinar damage in man.

Authors:  M P Ogren; C A Mateer; A R Wyler
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Span of apprehension performance, neuropsychological functioning, and indices of psychosis-proneness.

Authors:  R F Asarnow; K H Nuechterlein; S R Marder
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.254

8.  A comparison of cognitive/neuropsychological impairments of nonretarded autistic and schizophrenic children.

Authors:  S G Schneider; R F Asarnow
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1987-03

9.  Cognitive Processing Speed across the Lifespan: Beyond the Influence of Motor Speed.

Authors:  Deena Ebaid; Sheila G Crewther; Kirsty MacCalman; Alyse Brown; Daniel P Crewther
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Compromised Motor Dexterity Confounds Processing Speed Task Outcomes in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Essie Low; Sheila Gillard Crewther; Ben Ong; Diana Perre; Tissa Wijeratne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.