| Literature DB >> 31245300 |
Bingbing Xiao1, Chunyan Wu2, Wenfeng Song2, Xiaoxi Niu1, Nan Qin2, Zhaohui Liu1, Qian Xu2,3.
Abstract
To investigate the parameters associated with post-treatment recurrence of bacterial vaginosis (BV), clinical factors and vaginal microbiota were examined and analyzed for BV patients who received standard metronidazole therapy. The variables associated with BV recurrence included clinical factors of past BV history, use of intravaginal device, and D7 Nugent score as well as many microbial genera, with Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Ureaplasma, and Aerococcus being the top contributors. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that whereas overwhelming majority of interbacterial interactions were positive, negative interactions were present and connected mostly to Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and to a less extent Ureaplasma, suggesting the importance of interbacterial antagonism for treatment outcome. The patients who were cured and recurrent also exhibited clear differences in the species composition of Lactobacillus: although L. iners remained the dominant species at all time points, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii displayed apparent differences in relative abundance between the cure and recurrent groups. Based on these results, we developed a 5-component panel comprising Enterococcus, L. crispatus, Ureaplasma, Aerococcus, and L. jensenii for predicting recurrence using D7 data and showed that it generated the specificity, sensitivity, and AUC values of 0.80, 0.66, and 0.73 for the discovery cohort and 0.80, 0.67, and 0.69 for the validation cohort. Our findings highlighted key microbial components for BV recurrence and suggested that they could be used to monitor the treatment outcome.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; Enterococcus; Lactobacillus; bacterial vaginosis (BV); metronidazole; recurrence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31245300 PMCID: PMC6579829 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Comparison of vaginal microbiota at different time points between the cure group and recurrence group. (A) Top 20 abundant phyla; (B) top 20 abundant genera; (C) α-diversity (Shannon index); (D) PCoA based unweighted Unifrac distance matrices of OTU abundance profile.
Association analysis of clinical factors and BV recurrence.
| Smoking | Fisher exact test | 1 |
| History of BV | Chisq.test | 0.04053 |
| History of surgery | Fisher exact test | 0.1528 |
| Use of intrauterine device | Chisq.test | 0.03946 |
| Menstrual status | Fisher exact test | 0.1503 |
| Nugent score | Fisher exact test | 0.0004888 |
| Sexual behaviors during D0-D7 | Fisher exact test | 0.721 |
| Sexual behaviors during D7-D30 | Fisher exact test | 1 |
| Vaginal “fishy” odor | Fisher exact test | 0.756 |
| Vaginal pruritus | Chisq.test | 0.6423 |
| Age | Rank sum test | 0.4142 |
| pH | Rank sum test | 0.9123 |
| Vaginal discharge | Chisq.test | 0.1255 |
Figure 2A predictive model of importance based on the genus-level abundance profile using random forests. (A) The relative importance of each genus in the predictive model was assessed using the mean decreasing Gini coefficient in vaginal microbiota. (B) The ROC curve for predicting recurrence generated by random forest; the plots shown in ROC represent the corresponding optimal threshold. (C) The heatmap of top 10 phylotypes for recurrence importance generated by random forest.
Figure 3Co-occurrence network showing the correlations between major phylotypes of vaginal microbiota at different time points in the recurrence group (A) and cure group (B). Each genus is only shown in a color corresponding to the time point when it has the highest relative abundance. Node size indicates the average abundance of each genus. Lines between nodes represent the interbacterial correlations (edges), and blue solid line and red dashed line indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively.
Figure 4Species composition of Lactobacillus of vaginal microbiota at different time points in the recurrence group and cure group and generation of a 5-component panel for predicting recurrence. (A) The relative abundances of individual Lactobacillus species. (B) The relative importance of each phylotype in the predictive model was assessed using mean decreasing Gini coefficient in a pool of 8 candidates; the top 5 phylotypes in the box of the dashed line were included in the 5-component panel for recurrence prediction. (C) The ROC curve for predicting recurrence using the 5-component panel; the plots shown in ROC represent the corresponding optimal threshold.