| Literature DB >> 31245035 |
W K Chiu1, W H Ong1, M Russ2,3,4, T Tran1, M Fitzgerald2,3,5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This paper aims to evaluate the effects of mass loading on the healing assessment of an internally fixated femur by vibrational means. The presence of soft tissue surrounding a femur increases damping and mass of a system, and hence affects the vibrational response of a mechanical structure by obscuring the coherent modes. This may compromise vibration-based monitoring strategies in identifying modes associated with fracture healing.Entities:
Keywords: Bone healing assessment; fracture healing assessment; internal fixation; structural health monitoring; vibration analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31245035 PMCID: PMC6582286 DOI: 10.1177/2055668319842806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng ISSN: 2055-6683
Figure 1.Experimental setup.
Figure 2.Illustration of the plate-screw system fixated the fractured femur.
Mass of test specimen with plate fixation.
| Sawbone femur | 512 g |
| Sawbone femur + fixation | 600 g |
| Sawbone femur + fixation + clay | 1600 g |
Figure 3.Cross-spectrum for femur bone with plate-screw fixation without modelling clay.
Figure 4.Cross-spectrum and coherence functions for femur with plate-screw fixation (with modelling clay). (a) 0–60 min; (b) up to 150 min.
Figure 5.State of healing. (a) HI for femur with plate-screw fixation; (b) Cross-spectrum amplitude evolution and HIt with time.
Figure 6.Cross-spectrum and coherence functions for femur with plate-screw fixation (repeated experiment). (a) 0–60 min; (b) up to 150 min.
Figure 7.State of healing (repeated experiment). (a) Healing index for femur with plate-screw fixation; (b) Cross-spectrum amplitude evolution and HIt with time.
Figure 8.Illustration of femur with IM nail installed.
Mass of test specimen with IM nail fixation.
| Sawbone femur | 512 g |
| Sawbone femur + fixation | 638 g |
| Sawbone femur + fixation + clay | 1638 g |
Figure 9.Cross-spectrum data for femur with IM nail without modelling clay (i.e. no mass loading).
Figure 10.Cross-spectrum and coherence functions for femur with IM Nail. (a) 0–60 min; (b) up to 150 min.
Figure 11.State of healing. (a) Healing index for femur with IM Nail; (b) Cross-spectrum amplitude evolution and HIt with time.
Figure 12.Cross-spectrum and coherence functions for femur with IM Nail (repeated experiment). (a) 0–60 min; (b) up to 150 min.
Figure 13.State of healing. (a) Healing index for femur with IM nail; (b) Cross-spectrum amplitude evolution and HIt with time.