| Literature DB >> 31244641 |
Naoya Toriu1, Akinari Sekine1, Hiroki Mizuno1, Eiko Hasegawa1, Masayuki Yamanouchi1, Rikako Hiramatsu1, Noriko Hayami1, Junichi Hoshino1, Masahiro Kawada1, Tatsuya Suwabe1, Keiichi Sumida1, Naoki Sawa1, Kenmei Takaichi1,2, Kenichi Ohashi3,4, Takeshi Fujii3, Shuichiro Matoba5, Yoshifumi Ubara1,2.
Abstract
An 88-year-old Japanese man received bevacizumab for colorectal cancer with liver and peritoneal metastasis, during which nephrotic range proteinuria occurred (7.66 g/day). Renal biopsy showed endothelial damage with subendothelial swelling and a double contour of the glomerular basement membrane, which indicated a diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). After bevacizumab was stopped, proteinuria decreased to 1 g/day. During the clinical course, this patient had no extrarenal manifestations. This case suggests that renal injury induced by bevacizumab is characterized by nephrotic range proteinuria and histological TMA, and is a renal-limited condition that differs from systemic TMA related to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.Entities:
Keywords: Bevacizumab; Colorectal cancer; Nephrotic syndrome; Thrombotic microangiopathy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31244641 PMCID: PMC6587198 DOI: 10.1159/000500716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Oncol ISSN: 1662-6575
Laboratory findings
| Normal range | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 85 | 87 | ||
| Body weight | 61.7 | 70.3 | kg | |
| White blood cells | 6,700 | 6,600 | 3,200–7,900 | /µL |
| Hemoglobin | 8.3 | 14.8 | 11.3–15.0 | g/dL |
| Hematocrit | 28.1 | 42.6 | 34.0–46.3 | % |
| Platelets | 293 | 121 | 155–350 | *103/µL |
| Total protein | 7.6 | 5.1 | 6.9–8.4 | g/dL |
| Albumin | 3.6 | 2.2 | 3.9–5.2 | g/dL |
| Transferrin | ND | 177 | 190–300 | mg/dL |
| AST | 16 | 31 | 13–33 | IU/L |
| ALT | 9 | 13 | 117–350 | IU/L |
| LDH | 196 | 272 | 119–229 | IU/L |
| ALP | 228 | 175 | 117–350 | IU/L |
| γ-GTP | 21 | 27 | 9–109 | IU/L |
| Urea nitrogen | 25 | 22 | 8–21 | mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 1.0 | 1.57 | 0.46–0.78 | mg/dL |
| eGFR | 54.2 | 32.7 | >90 | /min/1.73 |
| Uremic acid | 5.2 | 6.4 | 2.5–7.0 | mg/dL |
| HbA1c | ND | 5.9 | 4.6–6.2 | % |
| Triglyceride | ND | 79 | 30–150 | mg/dL |
| Total Cholesterol | ND | 273 | 122–240 | mg/dL |
| HDL Cholesterol | ND | 68 | 35-70 | mg/dL |
| LDL Cholesterol | ND | 171 | <140 | mg/dL |
| Na | 138 | 140 | 139–146 | mmol/L |
| K | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.7–4.8 | mmol/L |
| Cl | 104 | 104 | 101–109 | mmol/L |
| corrected Ca | 8.9 | 9.7 | 8.7–10.1 | mg/dL |
| P | 3.5 | 3.0 | 2.8–4.6 | mg/dL |
| Fe | 14 | 80–120 | µg/dL | |
| Unsaturated iron binding capacity | 370 | 173–263 | µg/dL |
AST, asparate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine transaminase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GTP, glutamyl ttansferase; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration ratio; HDL, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; BJP, Bence Jones Protein; NAG, N-acethyl-β-D-glucosaminidase; α1MG, α1-microglobuline; β2MG, β2-microglobuline;eGFR, corrected Ca, selectivity index are calculated as previously reported [10, 11, 12].
Laboratory findings (continued)
| Normal range | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Totalbilirubin | 0.6 | 1 | 0.3–1.1 | mg/dL |
| IgG | ND | 771 | 870–1700 | mg/dL |
| IgA | ND | 335.4 | 110–410 | mg/dL |
| IgM | ND | 83.2 | 35–220 | mg/dL |
| ANA | ND | negative | negative | |
| Cryoglobulin | ND | negative | negative | |
| CH50 | ND | 53 | 30–50 | U/ml |
| C3 | ND | 107 | 86–160 | mg/dL |
| C4 | ND | 33 | 17–45 | mg/dL |
| CRP | 0.9 | 2.7 | 0.0–0.3 | mg/dL |
| APTT | 32.4 | 28.7 | 27.0–40.0 | sec |
| PT | 58.8 | 75.7 | >75 | % |
| BNP | ND | 1998.5 | <18.4 | pg/mL |
| VEGF | ND | 154 | <38.3 | pg/mL |
| CEA | 3.5 | 7.2 | 0.8–4.8 | µg/mL |
| CA19-9 | 32 | 69 | <36 | U/mL |
| anti-p53 antibody Urine | 840.00 | 1400.00 | <1.30 | U/mL |
| pH | 5.5 | 6.0 | ||
| Specific gravity | 1.026 | 1.011 | ||
| Red blood cell | 1-5 | many | /HPF | |
| Proteinuria | 0.07 | 7.66 | <0.1 | g/day |
| Transferrin | ND | 265 | mg/L | |
| IgG | ND | 49.2 | mg/dL | |
| BJP | ND | negative | negative | |
| NAG | ND | 50.0 | 0.8–5.0 | IU/gCr |
| α1MG | ND | 33.3 | 1.0–17.8 | mg/L |
| β2MG | ND | 10892 | 14–329 | µg/L |
| Selectivity index | ND | 42.62 |
AST, asparate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine transaminase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GTP, glutamyl ttansferase; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration ratio; HDL, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; BJP, Bence Jones Protein; NAG, N-acethyl-β-D-glucosaminidase; α1MG, α1-microglobuline; β2MG, β2-microglobuline;eGFR, corrected Ca, selectivity index are calculated as previously reported [10, 11, 12].
Fig. 1Light microscopic findings at renal biopsy. a: Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain shows segmental sclerosis(arrow) with adhesions. b, c: PAS stain shows endothelial cell injury and swelling (arrow). d: Periodic acid methenamine-silver stain shows endothelial cell swelling with a double contour of the glomerular basement membrane (arrow).
Fig. 2Immunofluorescence demonstrates weak partial positivity for IgM and C3 in the mesangial region.
Fig. 3Electron microscopy reveals endothelial injury with subendothelial edema and a double GBM contour, as well as effacement of the foot process, but there are no electron-dense deposits.
Fig. 4Clinical course. Bevacizumab: Avastin. Capecitabine: Xeloda.