Chun-Ying Qu1, Ying Zheng1, Min Zhou1, Yi Zhang1, Feng Shen1, Jia Cao1, Lei-Ming Xu1. 1. Chun-Ying Qu, Min Zhou, Yi Zhang, Feng Shen, Jia Cao, Lei-Ming Xu, Department of Digestive Diseases, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China.
Abstract
AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of colorectal cancer. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab for the treatment of colorectal cancer from January 2003 to June 2013 were collected by searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall response rate and adverse events. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Statistical analyses were performed with Stata 12.0. The degree of bias was assessed using funnel plots for the effect size of OS at the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Following the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, ten studies comprising 6977 cases were finally included, of which nine were considered to be of high quality (4-7 points) and one of low quality (1-3 points). Our meta-analysis revealed the efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with colorectal cancer in terms of OS (HR = 0.848, 95%CI: 0.747-0.963), progression-free survival (HR = 0.617, 95%CI: 0.530-0.719), and overall response rate (OR = 1.627, 95%CI: 1.199-2.207). Regarding safety, higher rates of grade ≥ 3 hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding, thrombosis, and gastrointestinal perforation were observed in the bevacizumab treatment group (P < 0.05); however, the incidence of serious toxicity was very low. There was no publication bias in the 10 reports included in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: The clinical application of bevacizumab in colorectal cancer is effective with good safety.
AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of colorectal cancer. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab for the treatment of colorectal cancer from January 2003 to June 2013 were collected by searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall response rate and adverse events. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Statistical analyses were performed with Stata 12.0. The degree of bias was assessed using funnel plots for the effect size of OS at the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Following the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, ten studies comprising 6977 cases were finally included, of which nine were considered to be of high quality (4-7 points) and one of low quality (1-3 points). Our meta-analysis revealed the efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with colorectal cancer in terms of OS (HR = 0.848, 95%CI: 0.747-0.963), progression-free survival (HR = 0.617, 95%CI: 0.530-0.719), and overall response rate (OR = 1.627, 95%CI: 1.199-2.207). Regarding safety, higher rates of grade ≥ 3 hypertension, proteinuria, bleeding, thrombosis, and gastrointestinal perforation were observed in the bevacizumab treatment group (P < 0.05); however, the incidence of serious toxicity was very low. There was no publication bias in the 10 reports included in this meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: The clinical application of bevacizumab in colorectal cancer is effective with good safety.
Authors: G P Stathopoulos; C Batziou; D Trafalis; J Koutantos; S Batzios; J Stathopoulos; J Legakis; A Armakolas Journal: Oncology Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Leonard B Saltz; Stephen Clarke; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Werner Scheithauer; Arie Figer; Ralph Wong; Sheryl Koski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Tsai-Shen Yang; Fernando Rivera; Felix Couture; Florin Sirzén; Jim Cassidy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frank A Scappaticci; Jamey R Skillings; Scott N Holden; Hans-Peter Gerber; Kathy Miller; Fairooz Kabbinavar; Emily Bergsland; James Ngai; Eric Holmgren; Jiuzhou Wang; Herbert Hurwitz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Bruce J Giantonio; Paul J Catalano; Neal J Meropol; Peter J O'Dwyer; Edith P Mitchell; Steven R Alberts; Michael A Schwartz; Al B Benson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Howard S Hochster; Lowell L Hart; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Barrett H Childs; John D Hainsworth; Allen L Cohn; Lucas Wong; Louis Fehrenbacher; Yousif Abubakr; M Wasif Saif; Lee Schwartzberg; Eric Hedrick Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marco Ravanelli; Giorgio Maria Agazzi; Elena Tononcelli; Elisa Roca; Paolo Cabassa; Gianluca Baiocchi; Alfredo Berruti; Roberto Maroldi; Davide Farina Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Zipeng Lu; Maximilian Weniger; Kuirong Jiang; Stefan Boeck; Kai Zhang; Alexander Bazhin; Yi Miao; Jens Werner; Jan G D'Haese Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel; Luciana Gontijo de Oliveira Clark; Luciano Paladini; Otávio Augusto C Clark Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 4.430