| Literature DB >> 31244343 |
Panagiotis Ntostis1,2, Georgia Kokkali3, David Iles1, John Huntriss1, Maria Tzetis2, Helen Picton1, Konstantinos Pantos3, David Miller1.
Abstract
A systematic review of the literature showed that trophectoderm biopsy could assist in the selection of healthy embryos for uterine transfer without affecting implantation rates. However, previous studies attempting to establish the relationship between trophectoderm gene expression profiles and implantation competency using either microarrays or RNA sequencing strategies, were not sufficiently optimized to handle the exceptionally low RNA inputs available from biopsied material. In this pilot study, we report that differential gene expression in human trophectoderm biopsies assayed by an ultra-sensitive next generation RNA sequencing strategy could predict blastocyst implantation competence. RNA expression profiles from isolated human trophectoderm cells were analysed with established clinical pregnancy being the primary endpoint. Following RNA sequencing, a total of 47 transcripts were found to be significantly differentially expressed between the trophectoderm cells from successfully implanted (competent) versus unsuccessful (incompetent) blastocysts. Of these, 36 transcripts were significantly down-regulated in the incompetent blastocysts, including Hydroxysteroid 17-Beta Dehydrogenase 1 (HSD17B1) and Cytochrome P450 Family 11 Subfamily A Member 1 (CYP11A1), while the remaining 11 transcripts were significantly up-regulated, including BCL2 Antagonist/Killer 1 (BAK1) and KH Domain Containing 1 Pseudogene 1 (KHDC1P1) of which the latter was always detected in the incompetent and absent in all competent blastocysts. Ontological analysis of differentially expressed RNAs revealed pathways involved in steroidogenic processes with high confidence. Novel differentially expressed transcripts were also noted by reference to a de novo sequence assembly. The selection of the blastocyst with the best potential to support full-term pregnancy following single embryo transfer could reduce the need for multiple treatment cycles and embryo transfers. The main limitation was the low sample size (N = 8). Despite this shortcoming, the pilot suggests that trophectoderm biopsy could assist with the selection of healthy embryos for embryo transfer. A larger cohort of samples is needed to confirm these findings. Abbreviations: AMA: advanced maternal age; ART: assisted reproductive technology; CP: clinical pregnancy; DE: differential expression; FDR: false discovery rate; IVF: in vitro fertilization; LD PCR: long distance PCR; qRT-PCR: quantitative real-time PCR; SET: single embryo transfer; TE: trophectoderm.Entities:
Keywords: RNA sequencing; Transcriptome; differential gene expression; implantation competence; trophectoderm
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31244343 PMCID: PMC6816490 DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2019.1625085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Syst Biol Reprod Med ISSN: 1939-6368 Impact factor: 3.061
Figure 1.Scatter plot of DE (successful vs unsuccessful blastocyst) derived by edgeR analysis. Results are from edgeR analysis with the Y-axis representing the log2 fold change (log-FC) and the X axis the average log counts-per-million reads (CPM). Upper and lower horizontal lines represent a log-FC of 1 and −1 up and down regulation, respectively, in incompetent blastocysts. Significantly up (light grey)- and down (dark grey)-regulated transcripts are indicated. There were 73 DE transcripts overall representing known genes (47) with the remainder being a mix of alternative splice variants and predicted transcripts.
Differentially expressed (DE) transcripts between competent and incompetent blastocysts.
| AA | Gene Name | log FC | log CPM | p value | FDR | AA | Gene Name | log FC | log CPM | p value | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −8.65 | 0.30 | 1.10E-05 | 8.46E-03 | 25 | −2.16 | 5.86 | 3.77E-05 | 1.85E-02 | ||
| 2 | −8.51 | 1.59 | 7.93E-07 | 1.45E-03 | 26 | −2.15 | 7.46 | 1.34E-04 | 3.72E-02 | ||
| 3 | −7.73 | 2.88 | 3.44E-11 | 1.79E-07 | 27 | −1.98 | 7.70 | 5.50E-06 | 5.49E-03 | ||
| 4 | −7.16 | 1.82 | 6.32E-06 | 5.49E-03 | 28 | −1.98 | 7.70 | 4.78E-06 | 5.49E-03 | ||
| 5 | −6.03 | 1.22 | 2.34E-04 | 4.98E-02 | 29 | −1.89 | 5.53 | 2.06E-04 | 4.83E-02 | ||
| 6 | −5.88 | 3.02 | 4.66E-10 | 1.69E-06 | 30 | −1.88 | 5.54 | 1.98E-04 | 4.81E-02 | ||
| 7 | −5.47 | 3.14 | 1.22E-04 | 3.59E-02 | 31 | −1.79 | 7.96 | 1.78E-04 | 4.60E-02 | ||
| 8 | −4.52 | 4.89 | 9.06E-05 | 3.20E-02 | 32 | −1.73 | 7.53 | 1.26E-04 | 3.63E-02 | ||
| 9 | −4.50 | 4.37 | 7.49E-05 | 2.97E-02 | 33 | −1.62 | 7.70 | 8.54E-05 | 3.18E-02 | ||
| 10 | −3.47 | 3.86 | 4.04E-05 | 1.85E-02 | 34 | −1.62 | 5.96 | 7.00E-05 | 2.86E-02 | ||
| 11 | −3.44 | 3.42 | 1.01E-04 | 3.51E-02 | 35 | −1.48 | 6.80 | 1.15E-04 | 3.57E-02 | ||
| 12 | −3.15 | 5.48 | 4.06E-05 | 1.85E-02 | 36 | −1.44 | 7.64 | 1.21E-04 | 3.59E-02 | ||
| 13 | −3.12 | 4.97 | 1.89E-04 | 4.81E-02 | 37 | 2.20 | 6.03 | 2.20E-04 | 4.83E-02 | ||
| 14 | −3.04 | 5.05 | 1.58E-05 | 1.05E-02 | 38 | 2.41 | 4.97 | 2.03E-04 | 4.83E-02 | ||
| 15 | −3.02 | 5.27 | 6.66E-07 | 1.42E-03 | 39 | 2.86 | 5.46 | 1.65E-05 | 1.05E-02 | ||
| 16 | −2.76 | 4.02 | 1.96E-04 | 4.81E-02 | 40 | 3.45 | 4.67 | 1.16E-04 | 3.57E-02 | ||
| 17 | −2.60 | 4.19 | 2.06E-04 | 4.83E-02 | 41 | 4.97 | 3.05 | 4.59E-05 | 1.95E-02 | ||
| 18 | −2.47 | 5.92 | 1.37E-05 | 9.83E-03 | 42 | 5.39 | 3.69 | 1.07E-11 | 1.12E-07 | ||
| 19 | −2.45 | 4.21 | 2.20E-04 | 4.83E-02 | 43 | 5.39 | 3.69 | 1.07E-11 | 1.12E-07 | ||
| 20 | −2.40 | 5.05 | 3.63E-05 | 1.85E-02 | 44 | 6.00 | 0.94 | 7.97E-05 | 3.08E-02 | ||
| 21 | −2.40 | 6.28 | 6.26E-06 | 5.49E-03 | 45 | 6.01 | 0.20 | 2.17E-04 | 4.83E-02 | ||
| 22 | −2.27 | 6.43 | 2.35E-08 | 6.13E-05 | 46 | 6.19 | 1.14 | 2.00E-05 | 1.22E-02 | ||
| 23 | −2.22 | 7.40 | 5.15E-06 | 5.49E-03 | 47 | 9.40 | 1.02 | 3.07E-06 | 4.26E-03 | ||
| 24 | −2.18 | 7.46 | 1.14E-04 | 3.57E-02 |
The list shows 47 DE genes/transcripts that were highlighted by EdgeR analysis with 36 down-regulated (log FC < 0) and 11 up-regulated (log FC > 0) in incompetent blastocysts. Log FC is logarithm fold-change and log CPM is logarithm copies per million. The FDR was below 0.05 in all displayed transcripts.
Figure 2.UCSC genome browser tracks of selected DE transcripts. The plot shows pile-ups of sequencing reads assembled into transcripts for six different genes in eight TE samples. The top four pile-ups (per gene) correspond to gene expression in the competent (COMP) blastocysts and the bottom four to the incompetent (INCOMP) blastocysts. A de novo transcriptome assembly track is shown below each pile-up guided by the hg38 reference genome (black). The track corresponds to all exons detected by StringTie, including novel exons. The bottom track per gene represents the NCBI RefSeq gene annotation. The boxes in the lower two pile-ups represent the exons and the arrows the introns and expected direction of gene expression. The graph depicts a total of four representative transcripts; DHCR7 (A), CYP51A1 (B), HSD17B1 (C), and FDPS (D) that were down-regulated and one transcript, BAK1 (E), that was up-regulated in incompetent blastocysts and one transcript, EPHA1 (F), with poorer exon coverage. Scales for peak heights, representing pile-ups of read counts (CPM) are shown to the left of each plot.
Figure 3.KEGG pathway for steroid/hormone biosynthesis with relevant DE transcripts. The background diagram was adapted from Kanehisa labs (KEGG database) and includes steroid biosynthesis (map00100 pathway) and steroid hormone biosynthesis (map00140 pathway) (Kanehisa and Goto 2000). The diagram shows eight highlighted genes with significantly down-regulated transcripts in incompetent blastocysts.
Figure 4.Normalized qPCR results for verification of DE analysis. Following 2−ΔΔCt normalization and calculation relative to GAPDH expression (stable among our samples), the more highly expressed of the pairs in each case were set to 1.0 (arbitrary units). The chart shows that among the incompetent blastocysts, HSD17B1, CYP11A1, and DHCR7 were significantly down-regulated, while BAK1 and KHDC1P1 were significantly up-regulated. Standard deviation error bars are also displayed in the graph. These results concord with the edgeR differential expression analysis obtained from the RNA-seq data.