Literature DB >> 24034939

Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization.

Gary L Harton1, Santiago Munné, Mark Surrey, Jamie Grifo, Brian Kaplan, David H McCulloh, Darren K Griffin, Dagan Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between maternal age, chromosome abnormality, implantation, and pregnancy loss.
DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study.
SETTING: IVF centers in the United States. PATIENT(S): IVF patients undergoing chromosome screening. INTERVENTION(S): Embryo biopsy on day 3 or day 5/6 with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) by array comparative genomic hybridization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Aneuploidy, implantation, pregnancy, and loss rates. RESULT(S): Aneuploidy rates increased with maternal age from 53% to 93% for day 3 biopsies and from 32% to 85% for blastocyst biopsies. Implantation rates for euploid embryos for ages <35-42 years did not decrease after PGD: ranges 44%-32% for day 3 and 51%-40% for blastocyst. Ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer did not decrease for maternal ages <42 years after PGD with day 3 biopsy (48.5%-38.1%) or blastocyst biopsy (64.4%-54.5%). Patients >42 years old had implantation rates of 23.3% (day 3), 27.7% (day 5/6), and the pregnancy rate with day 3 biopsy was 9.3% and with day 5 biopsy 10.3%. CONCLUSION(S): Selective transfer of euploid embryos showed that implantation and pregnancy rates were not significantly different between reproductively younger and older patients up to age 42 years. Some patients who start an IVF cycle planning to have chromosome screening do not have euploid embryos available for transfer, a situation that increases with advancing maternal age. Mounting data suggests that the dramatic decline in IVF treatment success rates with female age is primarily caused by aneuploidy.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Preimplantation genetic screening; aneuploidy; elective single-embryo transfer; embryo biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24034939     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  77 in total

1.  A greater number of euploid blastocysts in a given cohort predicts excellent outcomes in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Scott Morin; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo; Santiago Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  [Blighted ovum in subfertile patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology].

Authors:  Qing-Wen Nie; Rui Hua; Yao Zhou; Hong Li; Yan-Hong Yu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-07-20

3.  Easing US restrictions on mitochondrial replacement therapy would protect research interests but grease the slippery slope.

Authors:  David L Keefe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra Roeca; Rachel Johnson; Nichole Carlson; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Mitochondrial replacement by pre-pronuclear transfer in human embryos.

Authors:  Keliang Wu; Tailai Chen; Sexin Huang; Cuiqing Zhong; Junhao Yan; Xiaoyu Zhang; Jinsong Li; Yuan Gao; Han Zhao; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 25.617

6.  Polar bodies are efficient donors for reconstruction of human embryos for potential mitochondrial replacement therapy.

Authors:  Keliang Wu; Cuiqing Zhong; Tailai Chen; Xiaoyu Zhang; Wenrong Tao; Jingye Zhang; Hongchang Li; Han Zhao; Jinsong Li; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Authors:  Sonali Singh; Elie Hobeika; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 and day 5/6 embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer really make a difference?

Authors:  Susan M Maxwell; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Oleksii O Barash; Kristen A Ivani; Susan P Willman; Evan M Rosenbluth; Deborah S Wachs; Mary D Hinckley; Sara Pittenger Reid; Louis N Weckstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?

Authors:  Yael G Kramer; Jason D Kofinas; Katherine Melzer; Nicole Noyes; Caroline McCaffrey; Julia Buldo-Licciardi; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.