| Literature DB >> 31243793 |
Lena S Pflüger1,2,3, Katharina E Pink3,4, Anja Böck1,3, Michael A Huffman2,5, Bernard Wallner1,2.
Abstract
To produce offspring early in life is energetically demanding and depends greatly on environmental conditions. In female primates, age at first reproduction (AFR) has been associated with social parameters (e.g., population density and social rank), food availability and meteorological conditions (e.g., photoperiod, rainfall patterns, and temperature). Regarding the latter, less attention has been given to the influence of sunshine. In nonhuman primates, including the northern-most distributed Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata), sunbathing is an effective thermoregulatory strategy to maintain sufficient energy intake during harsh winter months. Furthermore, the energetic value of sunshine and its role in the synthesis of essential vitamins important for sexual development and overall fertility is well investigated using human and animal models. In the present study, we hypothesized that female's AFR is influenced by the amount of sunshine in a semi-free-ranging, provisioned a group of Japanese macaques. To test this, we gathered data on sunshine duration in the year females theoretically experienced the onset of puberty. This phase of the female life cycle is particularly prone to the effects of environmental conditions. In addition to the investigation of sunshine duration and other meteorological conditions (i.e., rainfall and temperature) we controlled for social parameters (i.e., group size and sex ratio) as potential covariates. We found a clear effect of sunshine duration on female AFR: Females who entered puberty in years with more sunshine reproduced for the first time at significantly younger ages than females who experienced less sunshine during this specific period of their development. Possible mechanisms for how the sunshine influences sexual maturation in Japanese macaques are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: meteorological conditions; puberty onset; reproductive timing; sexual maturation; sunbathing
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31243793 PMCID: PMC6773204 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Primatol ISSN: 0275-2565 Impact factor: 2.371
Descriptive statistics of years under investigation (1995–2016): Females’ first parity, sunshine duration in the year of puberty and controlling variables
| Variable | N | Min. | Q1 | Median | Q3 | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) at first reproduction | 74 | 3.03 | 4.10 | 4.96 | 5.08 | 7.86 |
| Sunshine duration (hr) year of puberty onset | 74 | 143.90 | 170.01 | 185.70 | 189.70 | 202.70 |
| Temperature (°C) year of puberty onset | 74 | 8.70 | 9.43 | 9.78 | 9.92 | 16.60 |
| Rainfall (mm) year of puberty onset | 74 | 67.58 | 85.58 | 102.08 | 108.25 | 132.67 |
| Sunshine duration (hr) year of sexual maturation | 74 | 143.90 | 170.10 | 178.00 | 185.90 | 202.70 |
| Temperature (°C) year of sexual maturation | 74 | 8.70 | 9.01 | 9.64 | 9.82 | 12.18 |
| Rainfall (mm) year of sexual maturation | 74 | 67.58 | 86.83 | 101.04 | 110.38 | 132.67 |
| Group size | 74 | 36.00 | 83.00 | 109.00 | 141.00 | 158.00 |
| Sex ratio | 74 | 12.50 | 58.62 | 70.59 | 75.86 | 85.37 |
Note: Given are measures of central tendency and variance of the distribution. Year of puberty onset: The year females reached the age of 2.5 and theoretically entered puberty. Year of sexual maturation: The earliest year of sexual maturation, i.e., when females reached the age of 3.5. Given are the minimum (Min.) and maximum (Max.) value, the first (Q1) and third (Q3) quantile, and the median. Meteorological data from 1995 to 2016 were provided by the JMA weather station in Osaka and the ZAMG. Birth records from 1997 to 2017 were provided by the Affenberg Zoobetriebsgesellschaft mbH.
Measured at the onset of the mating period (1 September) in which females turned 3.5 years.
Figure 1Pairwise correlation between initial variables of interest. Descriptive statistics (correlation matrix; N = 74) of variables included in the initial model: GS=group size, sexR=socionomic sex ratio, RSM=mean rainfall (mm) in the earliest year of sexual maturation, SP=mean sunshine duration (hr) in the year of puberty onset, SSM=mean sunshine duration (hr) in the earliest year of sexual maturation, RP=mean rainfall (mm) in the year of puberty onset, AFR=age at first reproduction, TSM=mean temperature (°C) in the earliest year of sexual maturation, TP=mean temperature (°C) in the year of puberty onset. All predictors of the final model (sexR; SP; TSM; TP) were significantly (p < .001) correlated with females’ age at first reproduction. Positive correlations are highlighted in blue, negative correlations in red
Figure 2Correlation circle of partial least squares (PLS) regression showing the correlations of the variables with the first two components. Predictor variables that contributed to the final PLS regression model are illustrated as blue dots in the outer circle of the correlation circle: SP=mean sunshine duration (hr) in the year of puberty onset, sexR=socionomic sex ratio, TSM=mean temperature (°C) in the earliest year of sexual maturation, TP=mean temperature (°C) in the year of puberty onset. The dependent variable is illustrated as a red dot: AFR=age at first reproduction. For other abbreviations see Figure1
Figure 3Plot of the regression coefficient test showing the effect of each predictor on the dependent variable age at first reproduction (AFR). Predictor variables of the final partial least squares (PLS) regression model are represented as dashed bars with a coefficient different from 0: SP=mean sunshine duration (hr) in the year of puberty onset, sexR=socionomic sex ratio, TSM=mean temperature (°C) in the earliest year of sexual maturation, TP=mean temperature (°C) in the year of puberty onset. SP and sexR were negatively, TSM and TP positively correlated with the dependent variable AFR. For other abbreviations see Figure1