Javier A Valle1,2, Thomas J Glorioso1, Rory Bricker2, Anna E Barón1,2, Ehrin J Armstrong1,2, Deepak L Bhatt3,4, Sunil V Rao5, Mary E Plomondon1, Patrick W Serruys6, Arie P Keppetein7, Joseph F Sabik8, Ovidiu Dressler9, Gregg W Stone6,9,10, Stephen W Waldo1,2. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 6. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 7. Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 8. Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 9. Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York. 10. Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York.
Abstract
Importance: Anatomical scoring systems for coronary artery disease, such as the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, are well established tools for understanding patient risk. However, they are cumbersome to compute manually for large data sets, limiting their use across broad and varied cohorts. Objective: To adapt an anatomical scoring system for use with registry data, allowing facile and automatic calculation of scores and association with clinical outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional observational cohort study involved procedures performed in all cardiac catheterization laboratories in the largest integrated health care system in the United States, the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. Patients undergoing coronary angiography in the VA Healthcare System followed by percutaneous or surgical revascularization within 90 days were observed and data were analyzed from January 1, 2010, through September 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: An anatomical scoring system for coronary artery disease complexity before revascularization was simplified and adapted to data from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. The adjusted association between quantified anatomical complexity and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization, was assessed for patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Results: A total of 50 226 patients (49 359 men [98.3%]; mean [SD] age, 66 [9] years) underwent revascularization during the study period, with 34 322 undergoing PCI and 15 904 undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After adjustment, the highest tertile of anatomical complexity was associated with increased hazard of MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% CI, 2.01-2.23). In contrast, the highest tertile of anatomical complexity among patients undergoing CABG was not independently associated with overall MACCEs (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17), and only repeat revascularization was associated with increasing complexity (adjusted HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70) in this subgroup. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that an automatically computed score assessing anatomical complexity can be used to assess longitudinal risk for patients undergoing revascularization. This simplified scoring system appears to be an alternative tool for understanding longitudinal risk across large data sets.
Importance: Anatomical scoring systems for coronary artery disease, such as the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, are well established tools for understanding patient risk. However, they are cumbersome to compute manually for large data sets, limiting their use across broad and varied cohorts. Objective: To adapt an anatomical scoring system for use with registry data, allowing facile and automatic calculation of scores and association with clinical outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional observational cohort study involved procedures performed in all cardiac catheterization laboratories in the largest integrated health care system in the United States, the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. Patients undergoing coronary angiography in the VA Healthcare System followed by percutaneous or surgical revascularization within 90 days were observed and data were analyzed from January 1, 2010, through September 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: An anatomical scoring system for coronary artery disease complexity before revascularization was simplified and adapted to data from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. The adjusted association between quantified anatomical complexity and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization, was assessed for patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Results: A total of 50 226 patients (49 359 men [98.3%]; mean [SD] age, 66 [9] years) underwent revascularization during the study period, with 34 322 undergoing PCI and 15 904 undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After adjustment, the highest tertile of anatomical complexity was associated with increased hazard of MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% CI, 2.01-2.23). In contrast, the highest tertile of anatomical complexity among patients undergoing CABG was not independently associated with overall MACCEs (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17), and only repeat revascularization was associated with increasing complexity (adjusted HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70) in this subgroup. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that an automatically computed score assessing anatomical complexity can be used to assess longitudinal risk for patients undergoing revascularization. This simplified scoring system appears to be an alternative tool for understanding longitudinal risk across large data sets.
Authors: Glenn N Levine; Eric R Bates; James C Blankenship; Steven R Bailey; John A Bittl; Bojan Cercek; Charles E Chambers; Stephen G Ellis; Robert A Guyton; Steven M Hollenberg; Umesh N Khot; Richard A Lange; Laura Mauri; Roxana Mehran; Issam D Moussa; Debabrata Mukherjee; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Henry H Ting Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vasim Farooq; Patrick W Serruys; Christos V Bourantas; Yaojun Zhang; Takashi Muramatsu; Ted Feldman; David R Holmes; Michael Mack; Marie Claude Morice; Elisabeth Ståhle; Antonio Colombo; Ton de Vries; Marie-angèle Morel; Keith D Dawkins; Arie-Pieter Kappetein; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vasim Farooq; David van Klaveren; Ewout W Steyerberg; Emanuele Meliga; Yvonne Vergouwe; Alaide Chieffo; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael Mack; Ted Feldman; Marie-Claude Morice; Elisabeth Ståhle; Yoshinobu Onuma; Marie-angèle Morel; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Gerrit Anne van Es; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stephan Windecker; Philippe Kolh; Fernando Alfonso; Jean-Philippe Collet; Jochen Cremer; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Christian Hamm; Stuart J Head; Peter Jüni; A Pieter Kappetein; Adnan Kastrati; Juhani Knuuti; Ulf Landmesser; Günther Laufer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Dimitrios J Richter; Patrick Schauerte; Miguel Sousa Uva; Giulio G Stefanini; David Paul Taggart; Lucia Torracca; Marco Valgimigli; William Wijns; Adam Witkowski Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Joseph F Sabik; Patrick W Serruys; Charles A Simonton; Philippe Généreux; John Puskas; David E Kandzari; Marie-Claude Morice; Nicholas Lembo; W Morris Brown; David P Taggart; Adrian Banning; Béla Merkely; Ferenc Horkay; Piet W Boonstra; Ad J van Boven; Imre Ungi; Gabor Bogáts; Samer Mansour; Nicolas Noiseux; Manel Sabaté; José Pomar; Mark Hickey; Anthony Gershlick; Pawel Buszman; Andrzej Bochenek; Erick Schampaert; Pierre Pagé; Ovidiu Dressler; Ioanna Kosmidou; Roxana Mehran; Stuart J Pocock; A Pieter Kappetein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Elisabeth Ståhle; Ted E Feldman; Marcel van den Brand; Eric J Bass; Nic Van Dyck; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael E Farkouh; Michael Domanski; Lynn A Sleeper; Flora S Siami; George Dangas; Michael Mack; May Yang; David J Cohen; Yves Rosenberg; Scott D Solomon; Akshay S Desai; Bernard J Gersh; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Alexandra Lansky; Robin Boineau; Jesse Weinberger; Krishnan Ramanathan; J Eduardo Sousa; Jamie Rankin; Balram Bhargava; John Buse; Whady Hueb; Craig R Smith; Victoria Muratov; Sameer Bansilal; Spencer King; Michel Bertrand; Valentin Fuster Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-11-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Saswata Deb; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Dennis T Ko; Hideki Tsubota; Samantha Hill; Stephen E Fremes Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Javaid Iqbal; Yvonne Vergouwe; Christos V Bourantas; David van Klaveren; David V Klaveren; Yao-Jun Zhang; Carlos M Campos; Hector M García-García; Marie-Angele Morel; Marco Valgimigli; Stephan Windecker; Ewout W Steyerberg; Patrick W Serruys Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Rory S Bricker; Thomas J Glorioso; Omar Jawaid; Mary E Plomondon; Javier A Valle; Ehrin J Armstrong; Stephen W Waldo Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-12-07 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Christopher P Kovach; Annika Hebbe; Anna E Barón; Aaron Strobel; Mary E Plomondon; Javier A Valle; Stephen W Waldo Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; Andrew J Knighton; Emily Griese; Sarah M Greene; Paula Lozano; Amy M Kilbourne; Diana S M Buist; Karen Crotty; A Rani Elwy; Lee A Fleisher; Ralph Gonzales; Amy G Huebschmann; Heather M Limper; NithyaPriya S Ramalingam; Katherine Wilemon; P Michael Ho; Christian D Helfrichfcr Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2021-06