Literature DB >> 31240971

Pilot implementation of co-designed software for co-production in mental health care planning: a qualitative evaluation of staff perspectives.

Michelle Farr1,2, Christalla Pithara1,2, Sarah Sullivan1,2,3, Hannah Edwards1,2, William Hall4, Caroline Gadd5, Julian Walker4, Nick Hebden5, Jeremy Horwood1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Mental health policies advocate service user participation in care planning. However, service users often feel they're not fully involved and direct access to users' own electronic care plans in the community can be an obstacle. To address this, an electronic care pathway tool (CPT) was co-designed by service users, staff and software developers, to facilitate co-production of care and crisis plans. Aims: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of the pilot implementation of the CPT in professionals' practice to co-produce care plans and enable efficient working. Method: Qualitative interviews with fifteen mental health practitioners, and five service development/management staff. Normalisation process theory, which outlines the social processes involved in implementing technology, and co-production theory, informed interviews and data analysis.
Results: Multiple factors influenced CPT usage, including people's views of technology, practitioners' relationships with service users, service users' mental health needs, and their capacity for reflective thinking. The CPT's visual and interactive features could enable co-production of care plans. The CPT supported practitioners' efficiency, but its features did not easily streamline with electronic patient records. Conclusions: CPT interactive touchpoints supported service users' therapeutic reflection and facilitated care planning involvement. Information technology system interoperability was an obstacle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-production; care planning; care programme approach; co-design; crisis planning; electronic patient records; information technology; mental health services; normalisation process theory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31240971     DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health        ISSN: 0963-8237


  4 in total

1.  Co-Design for People-Centred Care Digital Solutions: A Literature Review.

Authors:  M Ferri Sanz; B Vallina Acha; M Ferrando García
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.120

2.  Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Lloyd; Amanda Kenny; Nerida Hyett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review.

Authors:  Helen Smith; Luke Budworth; Chloe Grindey; Isabel Hague; Natalie Hamer; Roman Kislov; Peter van der Graaf; Joe Langley
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-04-02

4.  Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation.

Authors:  Christalla Pithara; Michelle Farr; Jeremy Horwood; Sarah A Sullivan; Hannah B Edwards; William Hall; Caroline Gadd; Julian Walker; Nick Hebden
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.