Literature DB >> 31240180

Multimodal imaging of aortic annulus and root geometry after valve sparing root reconstruction.

Matthew Valdis1, Andrew Thain2, Philip M Jones3,4, Ian Chan5, Michael W A Chu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal annular stabilization technique following valve sparing aortic root reconstruction (VSRR) with no comprehensive imaging data to evaluate the natural history of aortic root graft geometry, aortic valve competency and patient prognosis post-reconstruction.
METHODS: Between 2008-2017, 70 consecutive patients (mean age 56.4±16.4 years, 19.7% females) underwent VSRR. All patients were prospectively evaluated annually with clinical follow-up, echocardiography and CT imaging. Patients were assessed for survival, freedom from reoperation, degree of regurgitation, New York Heart Association (NYHA) status and graft complications and followed up to nine years post-operatively (mean 36±21 months).
RESULTS: The largest increase of the aortic annulus diameter observed during the surveillance period was 2.64%±5.4% which occurred between the second and third years of follow-up and the aortic sinuses, sinotubular junction and ascending aorta all remained relatively stable based on annual CT imaging. Echocardiographic data showed far more variability in measurements at each annual post-operative visit with far less precision compared to the CT measurements taken at the same time. Due to the large variability and greater standard deviations, no significant difference was detected between the more precise CT measurements and those from the echocardiogram images. The overall survival rate was 94.3% (66 patients) at one year. Freedom from reoperation was 98.6% (69 patients). Throughout the entire duration of follow-up, aortic insufficiency was identified as 0 in 46 (65.7%), 1+ in 19 (27.1%), 2+ in 4 (5.7%), 3+ in 0 (0%) and 4+ in 1 (1.4%). Mean NYHA status was 1.1±0.3 at most recent follow-up for all patients. CT evidence showed 97.0% (64 patients) freedom from graft complication including: endocarditis, thrombosis, embolism, aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, dehiscence, dissection and kinking.
CONCLUSIONS: The annual imaging data presented here demonstrates stability of the Dacron aortic annuloplasty reconstruction over time, without the need for internal or external annular stabilization. CT imaging proved to be far more reliable than echocardiographic images, however given the stability, annual CT imaging is of little benefit. This is the first prospective study to compare echocardiographic, CT and clinical data following VSRR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Valve sparing; aortic annulus; cardiac imaging

Year:  2019        PMID: 31240180      PMCID: PMC6562094          DOI: 10.21037/acs.2019.05.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  20 in total

1.  Aortic root aneurysm: principles of repair and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Tirone E David; Manjula Maganti; Susan Armstrong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Aortic valve sparing operations: outcomes at 20 years.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

3.  Valve sparing root replacement: the remodeling technique with external ring annuloplasty.

Authors:  Emmanuel Lansac; Isabelle Di Centa; Jan Vojacek; Jan Nijs; Jaroslav Hlubocky; Gianclaudio Mecozzi; Mathieu Debauchez
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

4.  Root remodeling for aortic root dilatation.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Diana Aicher
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

5.  Incidence and progression of mild aortic regurgitation after Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Stephens; David H Liang; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Fabian A Kari; Michael P Fischbein; R Scott Mitchell; D Craig Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Techniques of aortic valve repair.

Authors:  J Scott Rankin; Jeffrey G Gaca
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2011-11

7.  An aortic ring to standardise aortic valve repair: preliminary results of a prospective multicentric cohort of 144 patients.

Authors:  Emmanuel Lansac; Isabelle Di Centa; Ghassan Sleilaty; Olivier Bouchot; Eric Arnaud Crozat; Dominique Blin; Christophe Acar; Mathieu Debauchez
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  A quarter of a century of experience with aortic valve-sparing operations.

Authors:  Tirone E David; Christopher M Feindel; Carolyn M David; Cedric Manlhiot
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.

Authors:  T E David; C M Feindel
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  David valve-sparing aortic root replacement: equivalent mid-term outcome for different valve types with or without connective tissue disorder.

Authors:  John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Fabian A Kari; Michael P Fischbein; David H Liang; Anne-Sophie Beraud; Elizabeth H Stephens; R Scott Mitchell; D Craig Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  1 in total

1.  Commentary: Aortic annuloplasty: One size does not fit all.

Authors:  Maral Ouzounian; Michael W A Chu; Mark D Peterson; Ismail El-Hamamsy
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-01-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.