| Literature DB >> 31238576 |
Zengkui Lu1,2, Mingxing Chu3, Qing Li4, Meilin Jin5, Xiaojuan Fei6, Lin Ma7, Liping Zhang8, Caihong Wei9.
Abstract
With the intensified and large-scale development of sheep husbandry and global warming, sheep heat stress has become an increasingly important issue. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms related to sheep responses to heat stress. In this study, transcriptomic analysis of liver tissues of sheep in the presence and absence of heat stress was conducted, with the goal of identifying genes and pathways related to regulation when under such stress. After a comparison with the sheep reference genome, 440,226,436 clean reads were obtained from eight libraries. A p-value ≤ 0.05 and fold change ≥ 2 were taken as thresholds for categorizing differentially expressed genes, of which 1137 were identified. The accuracy and reliability of the RNA-Seq results were confirmed by qRT-PCR. The identified differentially expressed genes were significantly associated with 419 GO terms and 51 KEGG pathways, which suggested their participation in biological processes such as response to stress, immunoreaction, and fat metabolism. This study's results provide a comprehensive overview of sheep heat stress-induced transcriptional expression patterns, laying a foundation for further analysis of the molecular mechanisms of sheep heat stress.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-Seq; heat stress; sheep; transcriptome
Year: 2019 PMID: 31238576 PMCID: PMC6617286 DOI: 10.3390/ani9060387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Influence of heat stress on serum T3 and T4 concentration of sheep.
| Item | Sex | Number | Control Group | Heat Stress Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 (ng/mL) | ♂ | 5 | 3.92 ± 0.041 A | 1.24 ± 0.020 B |
| ♀ | 5 | 3.89 ± 0.045 A | 1.28 ± 0.016 B | |
| T4 (ng/mL) | ♂ | 5 | 82.92 ± 1.55 A | 41.89 ± 1.23 B |
| ♀ | 5 | 76.05 ± 1.17 A | 42.73 ± 0.74 B |
In the same line, values with different upper-case letters are highly significantly different (p < 0.01).
Summary of sequenced RNA-Seq data.
| Items | CG1 | CG2 | CM1 | CM2 | HG1 | HG2 | HM1 | HM2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw reads | 69,008,628 | 39,367,262 | 69,141,276 | 68,952,966 | 78,420,396 | 51,776,410 | 76,392,674 | 60,428,044 |
| Clean reads | 68,367,484 | 38,903,468 | 68,478,224 | 68,463,512 | 77,762,862 | 51,308,882 | 75,471,938 | 59,933,578 |
| Clean ratio (%) | 99.07 | 98.82 | 99.04 | 99.29 | 99.16 | 99.1 | 98.79 | 99.18 |
| GC content (%) | 49.82 | 50.09 | 51.19 | 50.92 | 51.18 | 51.04 | 50.81 | 51.25 |
| Q20 (%) | 98.65 | 98.6 | 98.5 | 98.7 | 98.65 | 98.5 | 98.1 | 98.6 |
| Q30 (%) | 95.8 | 95.75 | 95.35 | 95.9 | 95.8 | 95.35 | 94.4 | 95.55 |
| Total mapped | 65,863,115 (96.34%) | 36,273,376 (93.24%) | 65,257,697 (95.30%) | 65,546,575 (95.74%) | 73,440,220 (94.44%) | 48,208,876 (93.96%) | 71,214,523 (94.36%) | 56,581,847 (94.41%) |
| Multiple mapped | 6,565,779 (9.60%) | 2,743,494 (7.05%) | 6,088,334 (8.89%) | 6,757,881 (9.87%) | 7,483,120 (9.62%) | 6,034,386 (11.76%) | 9,336,634 (12.37%) | 5,753,481 (9.60%) |
| Unique mapped | 59,297,336 (86.73%) | 33,529,882 (86.19%) | 59,169,363 (86.41%) | 58,788,694 (85.87%) | 65,957,100 (84.82%) | 42,174,490 (82.20%) | 61,877,889 (81.99%) | 50,828,366 (84.81%) |
| Unmapped | 2,504,369 (3.66%) | 2,630,092 (6.76%) | 3,220,527 (4.70%) | 2,916,937 (4.26%) | 4,322,642 (5.56%) | 3,100,006 (6.04%) | 4,257,415 (5.64%) | 3,351,731 (5.59%) |
CG1 and CG2 were males in the control group and CM1 and CM2 were females in the control group, while HG1 and HG2 were heat-stressed males and HM1 and HM2 were heat-stressed females.
Figure 1Distribution of gene expression levels. CG1 and CG2 were males in the control group and CM1 and CM2 were females in the control group, while HG1 and HG2 were heat-stressed males and HM1 and HM2 were heat-stressed females.
Figure 2Sheep genes identified to be differentially expressed between heat-stressed and control groups. (A) Venn diagram showing the differentially expressed genes. (B) Volcanic plot of the differentially expressed genes. (C) Heat map of the differentially expressed gene clustering analysis. HGHM were heat-stressed males and females, while CGCM were males and females in the control group.
Figure 3Functional analysis of sheep genes differentially expressed between the heat-stressed and control groups. (A) GO annotation of the differentially expressed genes. (B) KEGG enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes.
Figure 4Validation of differentially expressed genes by qRT-PCR.