Literature DB >> 31236844

Metaproteomics: Sample Preparation and Methodological Considerations.

Benoit J Kunath1, Giusi Minniti1, Morten Skaugen1, Live H Hagen1, Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad1, Vincent G H Eijsink1, Phil B Pope1, Magnus Ø Arntzen2.   

Abstract

Meta-omic techniques have progressed rapidly in the past decade and are frequently used in microbial ecology to study microorganisms in their natural ecosystems independent from culture restrictions. Metaproteomics, in combination with metagenomics, enables quantitative assessment of expressed proteins and pathways from individual members of the consortium. Together, metaproteomics and metagenomics can provide a detailed understanding of which organisms occupy specific metabolic niches, how they interact, and how they utilize nutrients, and these insights can be obtained directly from environmental samples. Here, we outline key aspects of sample preparation, database generation, and other methodological considerations that are required for successful quantitative metaproteomic analyses and we describe case studies on the integration with metagenomics for enhanced functional output.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assembly; Binning; Functional analysis; Metagenomics; Metaproteomics; Microbial communities

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31236844     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12298-0_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  8 in total

1.  Metadata harmonization-Standards are the key for a better usage of omics data for integrative microbiome analysis.

Authors:  Tomislav Cernava; Daria Rybakova; Michael Schloter; Gabriele Berg; François Buscot; Thomas Clavel; Alice Carolyn McHardy; Fernando Meyer; Folker Meyer; Jörg Overmann; Bärbel Stecher; Angela Sessitsch
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  Five key aspects of metaproteomics as a tool to understand functional interactions in host-associated microbiomes.

Authors:  Fernanda Salvato; Robert L Hettich; Manuel Kleiner
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 6.823

3.  An integrated workflow for enhanced taxonomic and functional coverage of the mouse fecal metaproteome.

Authors:  Nicolas Nalpas; Lesley Hoyles; Viktoria Anselm; Tariq Ganief; Laura Martinez-Gili; Cristina Grau; Irina Droste-Borel; Laetitia Davidovic; Xavier Altafaj; Marc-Emmanuel Dumas; Boris Macek
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

Review 4.  Inferring early-life host and microbiome functions by mass spectrometry-based metaproteomics and metabolomics.

Authors:  Veronika Kuchařová Pettersen; Luis Caetano Martha Antunes; Antoine Dufour; Marie-Claire Arrieta
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.271

5.  Evaluation of RNAlater as a Field-Compatible Preservation Method for Metaproteomic Analyses of Bacterium-Animal Symbioses.

Authors:  Marlene Jensen; Juliane Wippler; Manuel Kleiner
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-10-27

Review 6.  Considerations for constructing a protein sequence database for metaproteomics.

Authors:  J Alfredo Blakeley-Ruiz; Manuel Kleiner
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 7.  Metaproteomics insights into fermented fish and vegetable products and associated microbes.

Authors:  Emmanuel Sunday Okeke; Richard Ekeng Ita; Egong John Egong; Lydia Etuk Udofia; Chiamaka Linda Mgbechidinma; Otobong Donald Akan
Journal:  Food Chem (Oxf)       Date:  2021-10-22

8.  Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis.

Authors:  Ray Sajulga; Caleb Easterly; Michael Riffle; Bart Mesuere; Thilo Muth; Subina Mehta; Praveen Kumar; James Johnson; Bjoern Andreas Gruening; Henning Schiebenhoefer; Carolin A Kolmeder; Stephan Fuchs; Brook L Nunn; Joel Rudney; Timothy J Griffin; Pratik D Jagtap
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.