Literature DB >> 31233223

Is robotic surgery an option for early T-stage laryngeal cancer? Early nationwide results.

Jonathan Hanna1, Philip R Brauer1, Elliot Morse1, Benjamin Judson2, Saral Mehra2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To characterize patients undergoing laryngeal transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and compare to open partial surgery and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in achieving negative margins, requiring adjuvant radiation, and overall survival. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis.
METHODS: Early-stage (T1/2) laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients from the National Cancer Database. Univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regressions were used to identify predictors.
RESULTS: There were 1,780 patients included in the study (186 [10.4%] = TORS; 523 [29.4%] = open surgery; 1,071 [60.2%] = TLM). TORS was more commonly treated at academic centers (68.8% = open surgery, 53.9% = TLM, 71.0% = TORS; P < .001) and had more T2 (52.7% = TORS, 46.7% = open surgery, 20.5% = TLM; P < .001) and N-positive disease (26.9% = TORS, 19.5% = open surgery, 5.5% = TLM; P < .001). Surgical approach was significantly associated with margin status (positive margin rates: TORS = 17.4%, TLM = 20.0%, open surgery = 13.8%) between open surgery and TLM in multivariable analysis (compared to open surgery, TLM: 1.63 [1.12-2.38], TORS: 1.18 [0.72-1.94]; P = .04). Surgical approach was not associated with receipt of adjuvant radiation (compared to open surgery, TLM: 1.52 [1.04-2.24], TORS: 1.56 [0.97-2.49]; P = .05). It was not associated with margins or adjuvant radiation in supraglottic patients. TORS had the highest 5-year overall survival, although the survival for TLM was similar (68.7% and 64.8%, respectively), and both were higher than that of open surgery (59.1%; P = .01). In multivariable Cox regression for supraglottic patients, there was no observed difference between TORS and open surgery (compared to TORS, open surgery: 1.44 [0.93-2.24]; P = .25).
CONCLUSIONS: On multivariable analysis, there was no observed difference in margin status in TORS patients compared to TLM and open surgery (in both the total cohort and supraglottic subgroup). Similarly there was no observed difference in necessitating adjuvant radiation. In Cox regression, there was no observed difference between TORS and open surgery in overall survival for supraglottic patients. This study suggests that TORS may be a viable treatment option for early-stage laryngeal cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1195-1201, 2020.
© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laryngeal cancer; adjuvant radiation; margin status; overall survival; transoral robotic surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31233223     DOI: 10.1002/lary.28144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

1.  Development and experiments of a continuum robotic system for transoral laryngeal surgery.

Authors:  Fan Feng; Yuan Zhou; Wuzhou Hong; KeYong Li; Le Xie
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Functional and oncological outcomes of salvage transoral robotic surgery: a comparative study.

Authors:  Pierre Gazda; Clément Gauche; Léonor Chaltiel; Emilien Chabrillac; Benjamin Vairel; Guillaume De Bonnecaze; Agnès Dupret-Bories; Thomas Filleron; Sébastien Vergez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Evaluation of a curved surgical prototype in a human larynx.

Authors:  L R Schild; F Boehm; L Kienle; A Seitz; L A Kahrs; T M Boeckers; J Greve; T K Hoffmann; P J Schuler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Novel Energy Devices in Head and Neck Robotic Surgery - A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Talisa Ross; Neil S Tolley; Zaid Awad
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2020-04-23

5.  Is There Room for Microsurgery in Robotic Surgery?

Authors:  Jefferson Braga Silva; Catarina Vellinho Busnello; Matheus Ribeiro Cesarino; Luiza Fernandes Xavier; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-05-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.