E Masciocchi1, M Maltais, Y Rolland, B Vellas, P de Souto Barreto. 1. Mathieu Maltais, PhD, Gérontopôle de Toulouse, Institut du Vieillissement, Bâtiment B, 37 Allée Jules Guesde, 31000, Toulouse France, +33 6 74 70 63 71, E-mail : mathieu.maltais@usherbrooke.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To gather available evidence about overtime changes on physical performance in institutionalized elderly. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An electronic search was performed on PubMed database on May 2018. We selected articles reporting the evolution of physical performance in older adults living in care institutions. We looked for data from observational longitudinal studies; data from clinical trials were extracted only for subjects who did not receive exercise intervention. All types of performance-based tests, for upper- and/or lower-body, were scrutinized. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were reviewed; mean age varied from 78.3 to 88 years old. Fourteen studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), other three studies were non-randomized trials and a longitudinal observational study. Different tests assessing physical performance were examined: upper limb strength and lower limb strength, static balance, dynamic balance and mobility showed a tendency to decline over time. On average hand grip strength decreased by 2.2% per month, chair stand test by 3.5%, Berg balance scale by 2%, timed up-and-go test by 2.8%, gait speed by 2.1% and short physical performance battery by 2.8%. A minority of studies have shown an improvement in lower limb muscle strength, endurance and gait speed: in these studies, participants did not attend any kind of physical training but took part to social activities or cognitive interventions. CONCLUSION: This review shows how physical performance decreases over time in nursing home residents and quantifies their decline. However, in active controls, there was an improvement in some physical performance measures, which indicates that intervention other than exercise might prevent some loss in physical performance.
OBJECTIVES: To gather available evidence about overtime changes on physical performance in institutionalized elderly. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: An electronic search was performed on PubMed database on May 2018. We selected articles reporting the evolution of physical performance in older adults living in care institutions. We looked for data from observational longitudinal studies; data from clinical trials were extracted only for subjects who did not receive exercise intervention. All types of performance-based tests, for upper- and/or lower-body, were scrutinized. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were reviewed; mean age varied from 78.3 to 88 years old. Fourteen studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), other three studies were non-randomized trials and a longitudinal observational study. Different tests assessing physical performance were examined: upper limb strength and lower limb strength, static balance, dynamic balance and mobility showed a tendency to decline over time. On average hand grip strength decreased by 2.2% per month, chair stand test by 3.5%, Berg balance scale by 2%, timed up-and-go test by 2.8%, gait speed by 2.1% and short physical performance battery by 2.8%. A minority of studies have shown an improvement in lower limb muscle strength, endurance and gait speed: in these studies, participants did not attend any kind of physical training but took part to social activities or cognitive interventions. CONCLUSION: This review shows how physical performance decreases over time in nursing home residents and quantifies their decline. However, in active controls, there was an improvement in some physical performance measures, which indicates that intervention other than exercise might prevent some loss in physical performance.
Authors: Sharon Wallace Williams; Christianna S Williams; Sheryl Zimmerman; Philip D Sloane; John S Preisser; Malaz Boustani; Peter S Reed Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2005-10
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Iva Holmerová; Katerina Machácová; Hana Vanková; Petr Veleta; Bozena Jurasková; Dana Hrnciariková; Ladislav Volicer; Ross Andel Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2009-11-24
Authors: Yves Rolland; Fabien Pillard; Adrian Klapouszczak; Emma Reynish; David Thomas; Sandrine Andrieu; Daniel Rivière; Bruno Vellas Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Fredric D Wolinsky; Douglas K Miller; Elena M Andresen; Theodore K Malmstrom; J Philip Miller; Thomas R Miller Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Elizabeth E Baum; David Jarjoura; Ann E Polen; David Faur; Gregory Rutecki Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Gordon I Smith; Philip Atherton; Dennis T Villareal; Tiffany N Frimel; Debbie Rankin; Michael J Rennie; Bettina Mittendorfer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-03-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura L Bischoff; Thomas Cordes; Charlotte Meixner; Daniel Schoene; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Bettina Wollesen Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 3.636