OBJECTIVES: Subtherapeutic drug concentrations contribute to both primary and secondary nonresponse to infliximab in children with Crohn disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes and infliximab concentrations at infusions 2 and 3 with an objective to establish infliximab targets during induction for primary responders. METHODS: Single-center, prospective cohort of anti- tumor necrosis factor-alpha naïve CD patients younger than 22 years starting infliximab. Clinical response was defined with the weighted pediatric CD activity index at the fourth infusion. Rates of biological response (>50% improvement in fecal calprotectin) and maintenance concentrations ≥5 μg/mL were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 72 patients with CD with 70 of 72 receiving infliximab monotherapy. Clinical response, biological response, and start of maintenance concentrations ≥5 μg/mL were achieved in 64%, 54%, and 22%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) infliximab concentrations at infusion 2 and 3 in clinical responders were 27.8 μg/mL (19.5-40) and 14 μg/mL (8.3-24) compared to 18.8 μg/mL (9.1-23, P < 0.001) and 7.8 μg/mL (4-13.2, P < 0.01) in nonresponders. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined that an infliximab concentration ≥15.9 μg/mL at infusion 3 was associated with clinical response (area under the curve [AUC] 0.73), whereas an infusion 3 level ≥18 μg/mL was associated with a start of maintenance concentration >5 μg/mL (AUC 0.85). Independent predictors for infusion 3 levels <18 μg/mL included pretreatment prednisone, low body mass index, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, hypoalbuminemia, and an infusion 2 infliximab level <29 μg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: We found that infusion 2 (≥29 μg/mL) and infusion 3 (≥18 μg/mL) infliximab concentrations were strongly associated with improved early outcomes and higher first maintenance dose levels.
OBJECTIVES: Subtherapeutic drug concentrations contribute to both primary and secondary nonresponse to infliximab in children with Crohn disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment outcomes and infliximab concentrations at infusions 2 and 3 with an objective to establish infliximab targets during induction for primary responders. METHODS: Single-center, prospective cohort of anti- tumor necrosis factor-alpha naïve CD patients younger than 22 years starting infliximab. Clinical response was defined with the weighted pediatric CD activity index at the fourth infusion. Rates of biological response (>50% improvement in fecal calprotectin) and maintenance concentrations ≥5 μg/mL were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 72 patients with CD with 70 of 72 receiving infliximab monotherapy. Clinical response, biological response, and start of maintenance concentrations ≥5 μg/mL were achieved in 64%, 54%, and 22%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) infliximab concentrations at infusion 2 and 3 in clinical responders were 27.8 μg/mL (19.5-40) and 14 μg/mL (8.3-24) compared to 18.8 μg/mL (9.1-23, P < 0.001) and 7.8 μg/mL (4-13.2, P < 0.01) in nonresponders. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined that an infliximab concentration ≥15.9 μg/mL at infusion 3 was associated with clinical response (area under the curve [AUC] 0.73), whereas an infusion 3 level ≥18 μg/mL was associated with a start of maintenance concentration >5 μg/mL (AUC 0.85). Independent predictors for infusion 3 levels <18 μg/mL included pretreatment prednisone, low body mass index, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, hypoalbuminemia, and an infusion 2 infliximab level <29 μg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: We found that infusion 2 (≥29 μg/mL) and infusion 3 (≥18 μg/mL) infliximab concentrations were strongly associated with improved early outcomes and higher first maintenance dose levels.
Authors: Dan Turner; Anne M Griffiths; Thomas D Walters; Tong Seah; James Markowitz; Marian Pfefferkorn; David Keljo; Jacob Waxman; Anthony Otley; Neal S LeLeiko; David Mack; Jeffrey Hyams; Arie Levine Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: N Vande Casteele; D J Buurman; M G G Sturkenboom; J H Kleibeuker; S Vermeire; T Rispens; D van der Kleij; A Gils; G Dijkstra Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Peter C Church; Jack Guan; Thomas D Walters; Karen Frost; Amit Assa; Aleixo M Muise; Anne M Griffiths Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Niels Vande Casteele; Ann Gils; Sharat Singh; Linda Ohrmund; Scott Hauenstein; Paul Rutgeerts; Séverine Vermeire Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: C I De Bie; T Z Hummel; A Kindermann; F T M Kokke; G M Damen; C M F Kneepkens; P F Van Rheenen; J J Schweizer; J H Hoekstra; O F Norbruis; W E Tjon A Ten; A C Vreugdenhil; J M Deckers-Kocken; C F M Gijsbers; J C Escher; L De Ridder Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-11-14 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Casper Steenholdt; Jørn Brynskov; Ole Østergaard Thomsen; Lars Kristian Munck; Jan Fallingborg; Lisbet Ambrosius Christensen; Gitte Pedersen; Jens Kjeldsen; Bent Ascanius Jacobsen; Anne Sophie Oxholm; Jakob Kjellberg; Klaus Bendtzen; Mark Andrew Ainsworth Journal: Gut Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Thomas D Walters; Mi-Ok Kim; Lee A Denson; Anne M Griffiths; Marla Dubinsky; James Markowitz; Robert Baldassano; Wallace Crandall; Joel Rosh; Marian Pfefferkorn; Anthony Otley; Melvin B Heyman; Neal LeLeiko; Susan Baker; Stephen L Guthery; Jonathan Evans; David Ziring; Richard Kellermayer; Michael Stephens; David Mack; Maria Oliva-Hemker; Ashish S Patel; Barbara Kirschner; Dedrick Moulton; Stanley Cohen; Sandra Kim; Chunyan Liu; Jonah Essers; Subra Kugathasan; Jeffrey S Hyams Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Maria M E Jongsma; Dwight A Winter; Hien Q Huynh; Lorenzo Norsa; Seamus Hussey; Kaija-Leena Kolho; Jiri Bronsky; Amit Assa; Shlomi Cohen; Raffi Lev-Tzion; Stephanie Van Biervliet; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Tim G J de Meij; Dror S Shouval; Eytan Wine; Victorien M Wolters; Christine Martinez-Vinson; Lissy de Ridder Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 3.183