Literature DB >> 31231916

Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver version 5 (RECICL 2019 revised version).

Masatoshi Kudo1, Masafumi Ikeda2, Kazuomi Ueshima1, Michiie Sakamoto3, Shuichiro Shiina4, Ryosuke Tateishi2, Kiyoshi Hasegawa5, Junji Furuse6, Shiro Miyayama7, Takamichi Murakami8, Tatsuya Yamashita9, Norihiro Kokudo10.   

Abstract

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is inappropriate to assess the direct effects of treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. Therefore, establishment of response evaluation criteria solely devoted to HCC is needed in clinical practice, as well as in clinical trials of HCC treatment, such as systemic therapies, which cause necrosis of the tumor. Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) was revised in 2019 by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan based on the 2015 version of RECICL, which was commonly used in Japan. The major revised points of the RECICL 2019 are as follows: (i) CEA and CA19-9 have been newly added as tumor markers that should be recorded for use as criteria in the response evaluation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; (ii) the criteria now state that the details of molecular targeted therapy should be specified; and (iii) specific methods for overall evaluation are now described. Also, as an assessment of overall TE4 requires that TE4 is achieved in all nodules (even non-target lesions), the same calculation methods described above are used. We hope this new treatment response criteria, RECICL, proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan will benefit the HCC treatment response evaluation in the setting of daily clinical practice and clinical trials as well, not only in Japan, but also internationally.
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan; Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

Year:  2019        PMID: 31231916     DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Res        ISSN: 1386-6346            Impact factor:   4.288


  6 in total

1.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation for single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis of their impact on liver function and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Masayuki Ueno; Hiroyuki Takabatake; Satoshi Itasaka; Takahisa Kayahara; Youichi Morimoto; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Motowo Mizuno
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-10

2.  Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Early Refractoriness of Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tian-Cheng Wang; Tian-Zhi An; Jun-Xiang Li; Zi-Shu Zhang; Yu-Dong Xiao
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-03-18

3.  Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with 90Y Glass Microspheres: No Advantage of Voxel Dosimetry with Respect to Mean Dose in Dose-Response Analysis with Two Radiological Methods.

Authors:  Chiara Romanò; Stefania Mazzaglia; Marco Maccauro; Carlo Spreafico; Alejandro Gabutti; Gabriele Maffi; Carlo Morosi; Tommaso Cascella; Marta Mira; Maria Chiara De Nile; Gianluca Aliberti; Giovanni Argiroffi; Valentina Fuoco; Sherrie Bhoori; Consuelo Zanette; Alfonso Marchianò; Ettore Seregni; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Carlo Chiesa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Durable complete response is achieved by balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomotake Shirono; Hideki Iwamoto; Takashi Niizeki; Shigeo Shimose; Akira Kajiwara; Hiroyuki Suzuki; Naoki Kamachi; Yu Noda; Shusuke Okamura; Masahito Nakano; Ryoko Kuromatsu; Kenta Murotani; Hironori Koga; Takuji Torimura
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  Report of the 20th Nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Namiki Izumi; Shoji Kubo; Norihiro Kokudo; Michiie Sakamoto; Shuichiro Shiina; Ryosuke Tateishi; Osamu Nakashima; Takamichi Murakami; Yutaka Matsuyama; Arata Takahashi; Hiroaki Miyata; Tadatoshi Takayama
Journal:  Hepatol Res       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 4.288

6.  Systemic Inflammation Response Index is a Prognostic Risk Factor in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing TACE.

Authors:  Jun-Xiang Li; Peng-Fei Pang; Tian-Cheng Wang; Tian-Zhi An
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-06-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.