Literature DB >> 34790396

Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation for single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis of their impact on liver function and clinical outcomes.

Masayuki Ueno1,2, Hiroyuki Takabatake1, Satoshi Itasaka3, Takahisa Kayahara1, Youichi Morimoto1, Hiroshi Yamamoto1, Motowo Mizuno1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has high efficacy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is an accepted alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). However, SBRT for HCC may cause subacute liver injury leading to negative clinical outcomes. In this study, we compared changes of liver function and prognosis after SBRT or RFA in patients with single, small HCC by using a propensity-score matching analysis.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 140 patients with single ≤3 cm HCC treated with SBRT or RFA at Kurashiki Central Hospital between January 2014 and February 2019. Changes of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, local recurrence, and overall survival were compared between the propensity-score matched groups (31 patients treated with SBRT and 62 treated with RFA).
RESULTS: The ALBI score increased modestly but significantly after SBRT, while it was unchanged in the RFA group; the intergroup difference was statistically significant (P=0.004). No local recurrence was identified in the SBRT group, whereas the cumulative recurrence incidence was 9.7% in the RFA group (P=0.023). Overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-2.89, P=0.401).
CONCLUSIONS: SBRT had modestly negative impact on liver function but with appraisable local control of HCC. Our findings should contribute to the selection of this modality for treatment of single, small HCC. 2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); liver function; propensity-scores; radiofrequency ablation (RFA); stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34790396      PMCID: PMC8576213          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  36 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-associated liver injury.

Authors:  Charlie C Pan; Brian D Kavanagh; Laura A Dawson; X Allen Li; Shiva K Das; Moyed Miften; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. radiofrequency ablation in Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Nalee Kim; Jason Cheng; Inkyung Jung; Ja Der Liang; Yu Lueng Shih; Wen-Yen Huang; Tomoki Kimura; Victor H F Lee; Zhao Chong Zeng; Ren Zhenggan; Chul Seung Kay; Seok Jae Heo; Jong Yoon Won; Jinsil Seong
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Nonsurgically Managed Patients: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Devalkumar J Rajyaguru; Andrew J Borgert; Angela L Smith; Reggie M Thomes; Patrick D Conway; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Mark J Truty; A Nicholas Kurup; Ronald S Go
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Evaluation of response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tracy R Price; Susan M Perkins; Kumar Sandrasegaran; Mark A Henderson; Mary A Maluccio; Jennifer E Zook; A Joseph Tector; Rodrigo M Vianna; Peter A S Johnstone; Higinia R Cardenes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Radiation-Induced Liver Disease and Modern Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; Dawn Owen; Prajnan Das
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.934

6.  Validation and Potential of Albumin-Bilirubin Grade and Prognostication in a Nationwide Survey of 46,681 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients in Japan: The Need for a More Detailed Evaluation of Hepatic Function.

Authors:  Atsushi Hiraoka; Kojiro Michitaka; Takashi Kumada; Namiki Izumi; Masumi Kadoya; Norihiro Kokudo; Shoji Kubo; Yutaka Matsuyama; Osamu Nakashima; Michiie Sakamoto; Tadatoshi Takayama; Takashi Kokudo; Kosuke Kashiwabara; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 11.740

7.  Comparable Outcomes of Ultrasound versus Computed Tomography in the Guidance of Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Lu-Hung Lee; Jen-I Hwang; Yu-Chi Cheng; Chun-Ying Wu; Shou-Wu Lee; Sheng-Shun Yang; Hong-Zen Yeh; Chi-Sen Chang; Teng-Yu Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  ALBI versus child-pugh in predicting outcome of patients with HCC: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ying Peng; Qinglin Wei; Yonghong He; Qiaoling Xie; Yanchao Liang; Liangjun Zhang; Yiju Xia; Yan Li; Wensheng Chen; Jingjing Zhao; Jin Chai
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.869

9.  Switching Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Separable Cluster Electrode in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jin Woo Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Jeong-Hee Yoon; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Yoon Jun Kim; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Emerging curative-intent minimally-invasive therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kylie E Zane; Paul B Nagib; Sajid Jalil; Khalid Mumtaz; Mina S Makary
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-05-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.