Literature DB >> 31230991

The association between the introduction of quantitative assessment of postpartum blood loss and institutional changes in clinical practice: an observational study.

D Katz1, R Wang2, L O'Neil3, C Gerber4, A Lankford4, T Rogers4, J Gal2, R Sandler3, Y Beilin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Imprecise visual estimates of blood loss contribute to morbidity from postpartum hemorrhage. We examined the impact of quantitative assessment of postpartum blood loss on clinical practice and outcomes.
METHODS: An observational study comparing blood loss, management and outcomes between two historical cohorts (August 2016 to January 2017 and August 2017 to January 2018) at an academic tertiary care center. Patients in the intervention group (second period) had blood loss quantified compared with visual estimation for controls.
RESULTS: We included 7618 deliveries (intervention group n=3807; control group n=3811). There was an increase in the incidence of hemorrhage (blood loss >1 L) in the intervention group for both vaginal (2.2% vs 0.5%, P <0.001) and cesarean delivery (12.6% vs 6.4%, P <0.001). There was also a difference in median blood loss for vaginal (258 mL [151-384] vs 300 mL [300-350], P <0.001); and for cesarean delivery (702 mL [501-857] vs 800 mL [800-900], P <0.001). The median red blood cell units transfused was different in the intervention group having cesarean delivery (2 units [1-2] vs 2 units [2-2], P=0.043). Secondary uterotonic usage was greater in the intervention group for vaginal (22% vs 17.3%, P <0.001) but not cesarean delivery (7.0% vs 6.0%, P=0.177). Laboratory costs were different, but not the re-admission rate or length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying blood loss may result in increased vigilance for vaginal and cesarean delivery. We identified an association between quantifying blood loss and improved identification of postpartum hemorrhage, patient management steps and cost savings.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Postpartum hemorrhage; Quantification of blood loss

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31230991     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  4 in total

1.  Postpartum hemorrhage: Moving from response to prevention for Alaska Native mothers.

Authors:  Megan E Hadley; Gretchen Day; Julie A Beans; Reinou S Groen
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.447

2.  Effect of implementation of a colorimetric quantitative blood loss system for postpartum hemorrhage.

Authors:  Maryalice Wolfe; Jamil M Kazma; Ann B Burke; Homa K Ahmadzia
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.447

3.  Comparing Postpartum Estimated and Quantified Blood Loss Among Racial Groups: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Daniel Katz; Shradha Khadge; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-24

4.  Limitations of Gravimetric Quantitative Blood Loss during Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Robert L Thurer; Sahar Doctorvaladan; Brendan Carvalho; Andrea T Jelks
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2022-02-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.