Literature DB >> 35429349

Effect of implementation of a colorimetric quantitative blood loss system for postpartum hemorrhage.

Maryalice Wolfe1, Jamil M Kazma1, Ann B Burke2, Homa K Ahmadzia3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the implementation of a colorimetric quantitative blood loss (QBL) system during cesarean delivery improves clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis after cesarean section before and after implementation of the Triton based colorimetric QBL system. Prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage, amount of blood products transfused, length of hospitalization, and rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 2221 patients were included. There were 1192 patients in the pre-intervention group and 1029 patients in the post-intervention group. There was no significant difference between groups in the prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage (8.6% vs 9.3%, P = 0.57), amount of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) transfused (45 vs 30, P = 0.41) or average length of hospital stay in days (3.0 vs 3.0, P = 0.37). There was a statistically significant decrease in ICU admissions between the pre- and post-intervention groups (2.2% vs 1.0%, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: There was no effect of implementation of the colorimetric QBL application system on diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage, amount of blood products transfused, or length of hospital stay. Although a significant decrease in ICU admissions was observed, we could not determine if these transfers were hemorrhage related.
© 2022 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; postpartum hemorrhage; quantitative blood loss; transfusion

Year:  2022        PMID: 35429349      PMCID: PMC9569393          DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   4.447


  15 in total

1.  Quantitative Blood Loss in Obstetric Hemorrhage: ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION, Number 794.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The accuracy of blood loss estimation after simulated vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Paloma Toledo; Robert J McCarthy; Bradley J Hewlett; Paul C Fitzgerald; Cynthia A Wong
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Accuracy of Estimated Blood Loss in Predicting Need for Transfusion after Delivery.

Authors:  Shayna N Conner; Methodius G Tuuli; Ryan Colvin; Anthony L Shanks; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Quantification of blood loss: AWHONN practice brief number 1.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2014-11-07

5.  Effect of Implementing Quantitative Blood Loss Assessment at the Time of Delivery.

Authors:  Elizabeth Coviello; Sara Iqbal; Tetsuya Kawakita; Rebecca Chornock; Megan Cheney; Sameer Desale; Melissa Fries
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Clinical Experience with the Implementation of Accurate Measurement of Blood Loss during Cesarean Delivery: Influences on Hemorrhage Recognition and Allogeneic Transfusion.

Authors:  Andrew F Rubenstein; Stacy Zamudio; Abdulla Al-Khan; Claudia Douglas; Sharon Sledge; Griffeth Tully; Robert L Thurer
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Implementation of Quantification of Blood Loss Does Not Improve Prediction of Hemoglobin Drop in Deliveries with Average Blood Loss.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Eileen Wang; April Romanos; Kathleen O'Rourke; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Estimating blood loss: can teaching significantly improve visual estimation?

Authors:  Gary A Dildy; Archana R Paine; Natalie C George; Cruz Velasco
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  A comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour.

Authors:  K Razvi; S Chua; S Arulkumaran; S S Ratnam
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 10.  Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.

Authors:  Lale Say; Doris Chou; Alison Gemmill; Özge Tunçalp; Ann-Beth Moller; Jane Daniels; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Marleen Temmerman; Leontine Alkema
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 26.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.