Jin Hyuck Lee1, Soon Hyuck Lee1,2, Hae Woon Jung3, Woo Young Jang4,5. 1. Department of Sports Medicine, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Sports Medicine, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. opmanse@gmail.com. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. opmanse@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare muscle strength, muscle endurance, and postural stability in both the affected and unaffected ankles between patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) who underwent conservative treatment and those who underwent the modified Broström procedure (MBP). METHODS: A total of 67 patients (37, conservative treatment; 30, MBP) participated. Muscle strength and muscle endurance were measured using an isokinetic device, and postural stability was tested using a postural stabilometry system. We used the independent t test for continuous variables with a normal distribution and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: There was no difference in the muscle strengths of the affected and unaffected ankles between the groups. The muscle endurance of plantarflexion and inversion muscles was significantly lower in the affected ankles of the conservative treatment group than in those of the MBP group (plantarflexion: 209 ± 103.1 vs. 318 ± 162.2, p = 0.001; inversion: 93 ± 58.7 vs. 154 ± 65.9, p < 0.001). Static postural stability testing showed no significant differences between the affected and unaffected ankles of the two groups. In the dynamic postural stability test, the overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral stability indices were all significantly higher in the affected ankles of the conservative treatment group than in those of the MBP group (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.004, respectively), with no differences observed in the unaffected ankles. CONCLUSION: The MBP may significantly improve muscle endurance and dynamic postural stability in CAI patients in whom conservative treatment has failed. Therefore, clinicians should consider using MBP instead of conservative treatment when patients show severe muscle weakness or dynamic postural instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.
PURPOSE: To compare muscle strength, muscle endurance, and postural stability in both the affected and unaffected ankles between patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) who underwent conservative treatment and those who underwent the modified Broström procedure (MBP). METHODS: A total of 67 patients (37, conservative treatment; 30, MBP) participated. Muscle strength and muscle endurance were measured using an isokinetic device, and postural stability was tested using a postural stabilometry system. We used the independent t test for continuous variables with a normal distribution and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: There was no difference in the muscle strengths of the affected and unaffected ankles between the groups. The muscle endurance of plantarflexion and inversion muscles was significantly lower in the affected ankles of the conservative treatment group than in those of the MBP group (plantarflexion: 209 ± 103.1 vs. 318 ± 162.2, p = 0.001; inversion: 93 ± 58.7 vs. 154 ± 65.9, p < 0.001). Static postural stability testing showed no significant differences between the affected and unaffected ankles of the two groups. In the dynamic postural stability test, the overall, anterior-posterior, and medial-lateral stability indices were all significantly higher in the affected ankles of the conservative treatment group than in those of the MBP group (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.004, respectively), with no differences observed in the unaffected ankles. CONCLUSION: The MBP may significantly improve muscle endurance and dynamic postural stability in CAI patients in whom conservative treatment has failed. Therefore, clinicians should consider using MBP instead of conservative treatment when patients show severe muscle weakness or dynamic postural instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.
Authors: Tine Marieke Willems; Erik Witvrouw; Kim Delbaere; Nele Mahieu; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Dirk De Clercq Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Frederick Michels; H Pereira; J Calder; G Matricali; M Glazebrook; S Guillo; J Karlsson; Jorge Acevedo; Jorge Batista; Thomas Bauer; James Calder; Dominic Carreira; Woojin Choi; Nuno Corte-Real; Mark Glazebrook; Ali Ghorbani; Eric Giza; Stéphane Guillo; Kenneth Hunt; Jon Karlsson; S W Kong; Jin Woo Lee; Frederick Michels; Andy Molloy; Peter Mangone; Kentaro Matsui; Caio Nery; Saturo Ozeki; Chris Pearce; Hélder Pereira; Anthony Perera; Bas Pijnenburg; Fernando Raduan; James Stone; Masato Takao; Yves Tourné; Jordi Vega Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jin Hyuck Lee; Soon Hyuck Lee; Gi Won Choi; Hae Woon Jung; Woo Young Jang Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Da Hye Kong; Gun Sang Lee; So Hee Park; Min Cheol Joo; Sung Hyun Lee; Min Su Kim Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 3.411