PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to propose recommendations for the treatment of patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CAI) based on expert opinions. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 32 orthopaedic surgeons with clinical and scientific experience in the treatment of CAI. The questions were related to preoperative imaging, indications and timing of surgery, technical choices, and the influence of patient-related aspects. RESULTS: Thirty of the 32 invited surgeons (94%) responded. Consensus was found on several aspects of treatment. Preoperative MRI was routinely recommended. Surgery was considered in patients with functional ankle instability after 3-6 months of non-surgical treatment. Ligament repair is still the treatment of choice in patients with mechanical instability; however, in patients with generalized laxity or poor ligament quality, lateral ligament reconstruction (with grafting) of both the ATFL and CFL should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons request an MRI during the preoperative planning. There is a trend towards earlier surgical treatment (after failure of non-surgical treatment) in patients with mechanical ligament laxity (compared with functional instability) and in high-level athletes. This study proposes an assessment and a treatment algorithm that may be used as a recommendation in the treatment of patients with CAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to propose recommendations for the treatment of patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CAI) based on expert opinions. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 32 orthopaedic surgeons with clinical and scientific experience in the treatment of CAI. The questions were related to preoperative imaging, indications and timing of surgery, technical choices, and the influence of patient-related aspects. RESULTS: Thirty of the 32 invited surgeons (94%) responded. Consensus was found on several aspects of treatment. Preoperative MRI was routinely recommended. Surgery was considered in patients with functional ankle instability after 3-6 months of non-surgical treatment. Ligament repair is still the treatment of choice in patients with mechanical instability; however, in patients with generalized laxity or poor ligament quality, lateral ligament reconstruction (with grafting) of both the ATFL and CFL should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons request an MRI during the preoperative planning. There is a trend towards earlier surgical treatment (after failure of non-surgical treatment) in patients with mechanical ligament laxity (compared with functional instability) and in high-level athletes. This study proposes an assessment and a treatment algorithm that may be used as a recommendation in the treatment of patients with CAI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
Authors: Michel P J van den Bekerom; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Graham A McCollum; James D F Calder; C Niek van Dijk Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Eric Giza; Edward C Shin; Stephanie E Wong; Jorge I Acevedo; Peter G Mangone; Kirstina Olson; Matthew J Anderson Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Christian J Seebauer; Hermann J Bail; Jens C Rump; Bernd Hamm; Thula Walter; Ulf K M Teichgräber Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Masato Takao; Kentaro Matsui; James W Stone; Mark A Glazebrook; John G Kennedy; Stephane Guillo; James D Calder; Jon Karlsson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Frederick Michels; Giovanni Matricali; Stephane Guillo; Frederik Vanrietvelde; Hans Pottel; Filip Stockmans Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jin Hyuck Lee; Soon Hyuck Lee; Gi Won Choi; Hae Woon Jung; Woo Young Jang Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 4.342