Literature DB >> 31229389

What Emergency Medicine Rewards: Is There Implicit Gender Bias in National Awards?

Sara M Krzyzaniak1, Michael Gottlieb2, Melissa Parsons3, Nicole Rocca4, Teresa M Chan5.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Multiple studies have demonstrated a gender gap in the percentage of women recognized in national awards, but to our knowledge this gap has not been studied within emergency medicine. This study is designed to evaluate the presence of a gender gap in female representation in awards from national emergency medicine organizations in the United States and Canada.
METHODS: The awards from 5 national organizations during the past 5 years were reviewed. We developed a data extraction tool to identify and categorize the awards and recipients. Data were grouped according to gender distribution and assessed with respect to emergency medicine organization, year of award, category of award, and career phase specified by award.
RESULTS: The overall percentage of female awardees across all 5 organizations from 2014 to 2018 was 28%. Only 16% of all named awards were named after women, and female awardees were more likely to be recognized early in their career for advocacy and work pertaining to the advancement of women, whereas men were favored for awards recognizing mentorship and organizational contributions.
CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine is unique among other specialties in that the percentage of women represented in national awards (28%) closely mirrors the overall representation of women in emergency medicine (27.6% in the United States, 31% in Canada). This is in contrast to the documented leadership gap in academic medicine and emergency medicine, which may reflect a lag time between receiving national awards and earning academic and professional promotion. Although some organizations had significantly lower representation of female awardees, the overall trends indicate that women have closed the gender gap in award representation. This may signal a forthcoming change in other domains with established gaps in emergency medicine; specifically, in leadership and pay.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31229389     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  6 in total

1.  Proportion of female recipients of resident-selected awards across Canada from 2000 to 2018: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Sarah Silverberg; Shannon M Ruzycki
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-04-06

Review 2.  Priority strategies to improve gender equity in Canadian emergency medicine: proceedings from the CAEP 2021 Academic Symposium on leadership.

Authors:  Emma McIlveen-Brown; Judy Morris; Rodrick Lim; Kirsten Johnson; Alyson Byrne; Taylor Bischoff; Katrina Hurley; Miriam Mann; Isabella Menchetti; Alim Pardhan; Chau Pham; Gillian Sheppard; Ayesha Zia; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.410

3.  Preinvisible: An Early-Career Perspective on a Midcareer Phenomenon.

Authors:  Chen He; Alyson J McGregor; Resa E Lewiss
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-09

4.  Direct Observation Tools in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Michael Gottlieb; Jaime Jordan; Jeffrey N Siegelman; Robert Cooney; Christine Stehman; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-09-04

5.  Comparison of admission rates among patients treated by male and female emergency physicians: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Hisham Valiuddin; Hope Ring; Michelle Fallon; Yaser Valiuddin
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Equality in Recipients of Nephrology Awards from International Societies.

Authors:  Michael Haidinger; Svenja Ravioli; Gregor Lindner
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2022-06-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.