Sarah Silverberg1, Shannon M Ruzycki2. 1. Department of Pediatrics (Silverberg), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Division of General Internal Medicine (Ruzycki) and Department of Community Health Sciences (Ruzycki), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. 2. Department of Pediatrics (Silverberg), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Division of General Internal Medicine (Ruzycki) and Department of Community Health Sciences (Ruzycki), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. shannon.ruzycki@ucalgary.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Female physicians have been shown to receive fewer awards from medical societies than their male colleagues. We examined the sex distribution of recipients of Canadian residency association awards. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of the sex of staff and resident physician recipients of resident-selected awards from provincial and national residency associations using data from 2000-2018. We classified awards into professionalism, advocacy and wellness awards, and education and teaching awards based on award names and descriptions, and compared the proportion of male and female recipients in these categories. RESULTS: We identified 314 recipients of staff physician awards and 129 recipients of resident physician awards. Male staff and resident physicians had higher odds of receiving awards than their female counterparts (odds ratio [OR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.89 and OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18-2.46, respectively). There was a reduction in the odds of male residents' receiving an award over the study period (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98). Male physicians had higher odds of receiving education and teaching awards than female physicians as staff but not as residents (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.72-5.95 and OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.84-4.60, respectively). INTERPRETATION: Male staff and resident physicians in Canada had higher odds of receiving awards from provincial and national residency associations between 2000 and 2018 than their female counterparts. Given this disparity, it would be prudent for organizations that distribute awards to physicians, residents and medical students to examine their nomination criteria and processes for potential bias. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: Female physicians have been shown to receive fewer awards from medical societies than their male colleagues. We examined the sex distribution of recipients of Canadian residency association awards. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of the sex of staff and resident physician recipients of resident-selected awards from provincial and national residency associations using data from 2000-2018. We classified awards into professionalism, advocacy and wellness awards, and education and teaching awards based on award names and descriptions, and compared the proportion of male and female recipients in these categories. RESULTS: We identified 314 recipients of staff physician awards and 129 recipients of resident physician awards. Male staff and resident physicians had higher odds of receiving awards than their female counterparts (odds ratio [OR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.89 and OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18-2.46, respectively). There was a reduction in the odds of male residents' receiving an award over the study period (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98). Male physicians had higher odds of receiving education and teaching awards than female physicians as staff but not as residents (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.72-5.95 and OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.84-4.60, respectively). INTERPRETATION: Male staff and resident physicians in Canada had higher odds of receiving awards from provincial and national residency associations between 2000 and 2018 than their female counterparts. Given this disparity, it would be prudent for organizations that distribute awards to physicians, residents and medical students to examine their nomination criteria and processes for potential bias. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Julie K Silver; Saurabha Bhatnagar; Cheri A Blauwet; Ross D Zafonte; Nicole L Mazwi; Chloe S Slocum; Jeffrey C Schneider; Adam S Tenforde Journal: PM R Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Kathryn N Huggett; Ruth B Greenberg; Deepa Rao; Boyd Richards; Sheila W Chauvin; Tracy B Fulton; Summers Kalishman; John Littlefield; Linda Perkowski; Lynne Robins; Deborah Simpson Journal: Med Teach Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Julie K Silver; Anna M Bank; Chloe S Slocum; Cheri A Blauwet; Saurabha Bhatnagar; Julie A Poorman; Richard Goldstein; Julia M Reilly; Ross D Zafonte Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 9.910