| Literature DB >> 31227728 |
Vijaya Bhaskar A V1,2, Jörg Peter Baresel3, Odette Weedon4, Maria R Finckh4.
Abstract
Early vigour traits of wheat composite cross populations (CCPs) based on high yielding (Y) or high quality (Q) or Y*Q varietal intercross evolving under organic or conventional conditions in parallel populations were studied hydroponically. To eliminate storage and year effects, frozen F6, F10, F11 and F15 seeds were multiplied in one field, resulting in the respective Fx.1 generations. This eliminated generation and growing system effects on seed size for the F6.1 F10.1 and F15.1. Due to a severe winter kill affecting the F11, the generation effect persisted, leading to larger seeds and markedly different seedling traits in the F11.1 compared to the F10.1 and F15.1. Seedling traits were similar among parallel populations. Shoot length and weight increased in both systems until the F11.1 across farming systems and remained constant thereafter. Over time, seminal root length and root weight of organic CCPs increased and total- and specific- root length decreased significantly compared to the conventional CCPs. Rooting patterns under organic conditions suggests better ability to reach deeper soil nutrients. In both systems, Q and YQ CCPs were more vigorous than Y CCPs, confirming genetic differences among populations. Overall, heterogeneous populations appear very plastic and selection pressure was stronger in organic systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31227728 PMCID: PMC6588703 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45300-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Mean squares (MS) from analysis of variance of seed size comparing F6, F10, F11 and F15 grown in 2007, 2011, 2012, and 2016 in organic and conventional fields and stored frozen for 10, 6, 5, and 1 years, respectively, with fresh seed of the same generations (F6.1, F10.1, F11.1 and F15.1) increased for one year in the same field in 2017.
| Df | F6 vs F6.1 | F10 vs F10.1 | F11 vs F11.1 | F15 vs F15.1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | MS | MS | MS | ||
| Storage (T) | 1 | 19.0** | 780.0*** | 0.04 | 3.3 |
| System (S) | 1 | 44.0*** | 3.1 | 70.8*** | 24.5** |
| Population (P) | 2 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 7.3 | 7.9* |
| T x S | 1 | 22.2** | 0.1 | 34.3** | 23.1** |
| T x P | 2 | 0.6 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 0.6 |
| S x P | 2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 4.8 |
| T x S x P | 2 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.2 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Seed weights (TGW) of CCPs of F6, F10, F11 and F15 grown in 2007, 2011, 2012, and 2016 in organic and conventional fields, respectively and F6.1, F10.1, F11.1, and F15.1 grown in 2017 in a common conventional field.
| F6 | F6.1 | F10 | F10.1 | F11 | F11.1 | F15 | F15.1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic CCPs | 42.9a | 42.7a | 54.3 | 42.8 | 47.0a | 44.7b | 45.1a | 42.4b |
| Conventional CCPs | 38.3b | 42.0a | 53.5 | 42.2 | 41.2c | 43.6b | 41.1b | 42.4b |
| Mean stored seeds | 40.6 C | 53.9 A | 44.1B | 43.1B |
Mean squares (MS) from analysis of variance of early vigour traits of seeds of the CCPs of the F6, F10, and F11 grown in 2007, 2011, 2012 in organic and conventional fields and stored frozen for 10, 6, and 5 years, respectively and the F6.1, F10.1, and F11.1 grown in 2017 in a common conventional field and not frozen before use. Relative values were analysed.
| DF | F6 versus F6.1 (10 years frozen) | F10 and F10.1 (6 years frozen) | F11 and F11.1 (5 years frozen) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRL | TRL | SL | RDW | SDW | SRL | TRL | SL | RDW | SDW | SRL | TRL | SL | RDW | SDW | ||
| Storage (T) | 1 | ** | ** | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ** | NS | NS | NS |
| System (S) | 1 | NS | ** | NS | * | NS | NS | * | NS | *** | NS | ** | NS | NS | NS | * |
| Population (P) | 2 | *** | NS | *** | ** | *** | *** | NS | *** | *** | *** | ** | NS | *** | NS | *** |
| T x S | 1 | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | *** | NS | *** | ** | ** | NS | * | NS | NS | NS |
| T x P | 2 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | ** | * | NS | ** | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| S x P | 2 | * | * | NS | * | NS | ** | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | * |
| T x S x P | 2 | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, NS non-significant.
SRL - seminal root length; TRL – total root length; SL – shoot length; RDW– root dry weight; and SDW –shoot dry weight.
Figure 1Seedling vigour traits from seeds of CCPs of four generation maintained in organic and conventional farming systems (absolute means of 8 replications).
Mean squares (MS) from analysis of variance of seed size (absolute values) and early vigour traits (relative values) from seeds of CCPs of four generation (F6.1 to F15.1) grown under organic and conventional farming systems.
| Df | TGW | SRL | TRL | SL | RDW | SDW | SpecificRL | RDW:SDW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation (G) | 3 | ** | *** | NS | *** | * | *** | NS | ** |
| System (S) | 1 | NS | *** | ** | NS | *** | * | *** | *** |
| Population (P) | 2 | * | *** | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS |
| G x S | 3 | NS | * | *** | NS | *** | NS | *** | ** |
| G x P | 6 | NS | NS | NS | NS | * | NS | NS | * |
| S x P | 2 | NS | *** | NS | NS | *** | NS | ** | ** |
| G x S x P | 6 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, NS non-significant.
TGW – thousand kernel weights SRL - seminal root length; TRL – total root length; SL – shoot length; RDW– root dry weight; SDW –shoot dry weight; SpecificRL - specific root length calculated as TRL/RDW; and RDW:SDW - root:shoot ratio.
Figure 2Mean values for seed size (TGW) and mean relative values for seedling traits as affected by the interactions of four generations (6.1, 10.1, 11.1, 15.1) and two farming systems, organic (Org.) or conventional (Conv.). Points within a panel marked with different lower case letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05). Where no Generation x system interactions occurred, different upper case letter within a panel refer to the mean values for each generation (i.e. the main effect).
Figure 3Mean values for seed size (TGW) and mean relative values for seedling traits as affected by the interactions of four generation (6.1, 10.1, 11.1, 15.1) and three populations (Y, Y = Yield, Q = Quality and YQ = Yield by Quality intercross). Points within a panel marked with different lower case letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05). Where no Generation x Population interactions occurred, different upper case letter within a panel refer to the mean values for each generation. Population main effects are indicated next to the legend.
Figure 4Mean values for seed size (TGW) and mean relative values for seedling traits as affected by the interactions of three populations (Y, Y = Yield, Q = Quality and YQ = Yield by Quality intercrossed) and two farming systems. Columns within a panel marked with different lower case letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05). System main effects are indicated with different upper case letters.