Literature DB >> 20829193

Root-shoot growth responses during interspecific competition quantified using allometric modelling.

David Robinson1, Hazel Davidson, Clare Trinder, Rob Brooker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plant competition studies are restricted by the difficulty of quantifying root systems of competitors. Analyses are usually limited to above-ground traits. Here, a new approach to address this issue is reported.
METHODS: Root system weights of competing plants can be estimated from: shoot weights of competitors; combined root weights of competitors; and slopes (scaling exponents, α) and intercepts (allometric coefficients, β) of ln-regressions of root weight on shoot weight of isolated plants. If competition induces no change in root : shoot growth, α and β values of competing and isolated plants will be equal. Measured combined root weight of competitors will equal that estimated allometrically from measured shoot weights of each competing plant. Combined root weights can be partitioned directly among competitors. If, as will be more usual, competition changes relative root and shoot growth, the competitors' combined root weight will not equal that estimated allometrically and cannot be partitioned directly. However, if the isolated-plant α and β values are adjusted until the estimated combined root weight of competitors matches the measured combined root weight, the latter can be partitioned among competitors using their new α and β values. The approach is illustrated using two herbaceous species, Dactylis glomerata and Plantago lanceolata. KEY
RESULTS: Allometric modelling revealed a large and continuous increase in the root : shoot ratio by Dactylis, but not Plantago, during competition. This was associated with a superior whole-plant dry weight increase in Dactylis, which was ultimately 2·5-fold greater than that of Plantago. Whole-plant growth dominance of Dactylis over Plantago, as deduced from allometric modelling, occurred 14-24 d earlier than suggested by shoot data alone.
CONCLUSION: Given reasonable assumptions, allometric modelling can analyse competitive interactions in any species mixture, and overcomes a long-standing problem in studies of competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20829193      PMCID: PMC2990658          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  4 in total

1.  Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants.

Authors:  Brian J Enquist; Karl J Niklas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Quantifying species composition in root mixtures using two methods: near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and plant wax markers.

Authors:  Catherine Roumet; Catherine Picon-Cochard; Lorna A Dawson; Richard Joffre; Robert Mayes; Alain Blanchard; Mark J Brewer
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  An analytical treatment of root-to-shoot ratio and plant competition for soil nutrient and light.

Authors:  H L Reynolds; S W Pacala
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Unravelling below-ground plant distributions: a real-time polymerase chain reaction method for quantifying species proportions in mixed root samples.

Authors:  L Mommer; C A M Wagemaker; H DE Kroon; N J Ouborg
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 7.090

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect the allometric partition of host plant biomass to shoots and roots? A meta-analysis of studies from 1990 to 2010.

Authors:  Stavros D Veresoglou; George Menexes; Matthias C Rillig
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Seasonal variation in N uptake strategies in the understorey of a beech-dominated N-limited forest ecosystem depends on N source and species.

Authors:  Xiuyuan Li; Heinz Rennenberg; Judy Simon
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  Kinship rivalry does not trigger specific allocation strategies in Lupinus angustifolius.

Authors:  Rubén Milla; Ainhoa Vélez del Burgo; Adrián Escudero; Jose M Iriondo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  A new hammer to crack an old nut: interspecific competitive resource capture by plants is regulated by nutrient supply, not climate.

Authors:  Clare J Trinder; Rob W Brooker; Hazel Davidson; David Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The dynamic process of interspecific interactions of competitive nitrogen capture between intercropped wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.).

Authors:  Chunjie Li; Yan Dong; Haigang Li; Jianbo Shen; Fusuo Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Competitive Effects Hinder the Recolonization of Native Species in Environments Densely Occupied by One Invasive Exotic Species.

Authors:  Thaisa S Michelan; Sidinei M Thomaz; Fabielle M Bando; Luis M Bini
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Cultivar Differences and Impact of Plant-Plant Competition on Temporal Patterns of Nitrogen and Biomass Accumulation.

Authors:  Emily Jane Schofield; Jennifer K Rowntree; Eric Paterson; Mark J Brewer; Elizabeth A C Price; Francis Q Brearley; Rob W Brooker
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Effects of ten years organic and conventional farming on early seedling traits of evolving winter wheat composite cross populations.

Authors:  Vijaya Bhaskar A V; Jörg Peter Baresel; Odette Weedon; Maria R Finckh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.