Ardalan Shariat1, Mahboubeh Ghayour Najafabadi2, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari1,3, Joshua A Cleland4, Maria A Fiatarone Singh5,6, Amir-Hossein Memari1, Roshanak Honarpishe3, Azadeh Hakakzadeh1, Maryam Selk Ghaffari1, Soofia Naghdi1,3. 1. Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. 3. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Franklin Pierce University, Manchester, NH, USA. 5. University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia. 6. Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University and Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the leading causes of disability in the world with enormous economic burden is stroke. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effectiveness of different protocols of cycling with/without functional electrical stimulation on functional mobility after stroke. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched till 2018. Data extraction was performed using a pre-determined data collection form. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 14 trials satisfied eligibility criteria and were included. Cycling had a positive effect on the 6-meter walking test performance (SMD, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.11 -0.71; I2 = 0% ) compared with no or placebo intervention (control). Compared with control, cycling had a positive effect on 10-meter walking speed (SMD, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.05 -0.55; I2 = 0% ), and on balance based on the Berg score (SMD, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.06 -0.57; I2 = 49% ). Cycling with functional electrical stimulation had a positive effect on balance (SMD, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.99 -1.97; I2 = 91% ) compared with cycling alone. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that cycling has a positive effect on walking speed, walking ability and balance. Functional electrical stimulation combined with cycling has positive effects on balance beyond cycling alone.
BACKGROUND: One of the leading causes of disability in the world with enormous economic burden is stroke. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effectiveness of different protocols of cycling with/without functional electrical stimulation on functional mobility after stroke. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched till 2018. Data extraction was performed using a pre-determined data collection form. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 14 trials satisfied eligibility criteria and were included. Cycling had a positive effect on the 6-meter walking test performance (SMD, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.11 -0.71; I2 = 0% ) compared with no or placebo intervention (control). Compared with control, cycling had a positive effect on 10-meter walking speed (SMD, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.05 -0.55; I2 = 0% ), and on balance based on the Berg score (SMD, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.06 -0.57; I2 = 49% ). Cycling with functional electrical stimulation had a positive effect on balance (SMD, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.99 -1.97; I2 = 91% ) compared with cycling alone. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that cycling has a positive effect on walking speed, walking ability and balance. Functional electrical stimulation combined with cycling has positive effects on balance beyond cycling alone.
Authors: Jan W van der Scheer; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey; Sydney E Valentino; Glen M Davis; Chester H Ho Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 4.262