Hung-Ming Lam1, Holly M Nguyen2, Mark P Labrecque2, Lisha G Brown2, Ilsa M Coleman3, Roman Gulati4, Bryce Lakely2, Daniel Sondheim2, Payel Chatterjee3, Brett T Marck5, Alvin M Matsumoto6, Elahe A Mostaghel7, Michael T Schweizer8, Peter S Nelson9, Eva Corey10. 1. Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau (SAR), China. 2. Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 5. Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA. 6. Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 7. Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 8. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 9. Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 10. Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: ecorey@uw.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy improves the survival of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients, yet ultimately fails with debilitating side effects. Supraphysiological testosterone (SPT)-based therapy produces clinical responses with improved quality of life in a subset of patients. Currently, no information defines a durable response to SPT. OBJECTIVE: To identify key molecular phenotypes underlying SPT response to improve patient selection and guide combination treatment to achieve a durable response. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A patient-derived xenograft (PDX) preclinical trial was performed with 13 CRPC PDXs to identify molecular features associated with SPT response. Comprehensive intratumoral androgen, tumor growth, and integrated transcriptomic and protein analyses were performed in three PDXs resistant to the newer androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitor enzalutamide (ENZ) to define SPT response and resistance. INTERVENTION: Testosterone cypionate. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPT efficacy was evaluated by PDX growth, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change, and survival. Intratumoral androgens were analyzed using mass spectrometry. Global transcriptome analysis was performed using RNA sequencing, and confirmed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Log-rank and Mann-Whitney tests were used for survival and molecular analyses, respectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A durable SPT responder was identified, presenting robust repressions of ARv7 and E2F transcriptional outputs, and a DNA damage response (DDR) transcriptomic program that were altogether restored upon SPT resistance in the transient responder. ENZ rechallenge of SPT-relapsed PDXs resulted in PSA decreases but tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS: SPT produces a durable response in AR-pathway inhibitor ENZ CRPC that is associated with sustained suppression of ARv7 and E2F transcriptional outputs, and the DDR transcriptome, highlighting the potential of combination treatments that maintain suppression of these programs to drive a durable response to SPT. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with ENZ-resistant prostate cancer have very limited treatment options. Supraphysiological testosterone presents a prominent option for improved quality of life and a potential durable response in patients with sustained suppression on ARv7/E2F transcriptional outputs and DNA repair program.
BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy improves the survival of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients, yet ultimately fails with debilitating side effects. Supraphysiological testosterone (SPT)-based therapy produces clinical responses with improved quality of life in a subset of patients. Currently, no information defines a durable response to SPT. OBJECTIVE: To identify key molecular phenotypes underlying SPT response to improve patient selection and guide combination treatment to achieve a durable response. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A patient-derived xenograft (PDX) preclinical trial was performed with 13 CRPC PDXs to identify molecular features associated with SPT response. Comprehensive intratumoral androgen, tumor growth, and integrated transcriptomic and protein analyses were performed in three PDXs resistant to the newer androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitor enzalutamide (ENZ) to define SPT response and resistance. INTERVENTION: Testosterone cypionate. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPT efficacy was evaluated by PDX growth, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change, and survival. Intratumoral androgens were analyzed using mass spectrometry. Global transcriptome analysis was performed using RNA sequencing, and confirmed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Log-rank and Mann-Whitney tests were used for survival and molecular analyses, respectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A durable SPT responder was identified, presenting robust repressions of ARv7 and E2F transcriptional outputs, and a DNA damage response (DDR) transcriptomic program that were altogether restored upon SPT resistance in the transient responder. ENZ rechallenge of SPT-relapsed PDXs resulted in PSA decreases but tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS:SPT produces a durable response in AR-pathway inhibitor ENZ CRPC that is associated with sustained suppression of ARv7 and E2F transcriptional outputs, and the DDR transcriptome, highlighting the potential of combination treatments that maintain suppression of these programs to drive a durable response to SPT. PATIENT SUMMARY:Patients with ENZ-resistant prostate cancer have very limited treatment options. Supraphysiological testosterone presents a prominent option for improved quality of life and a potential durable response in patients with sustained suppression on ARv7/E2F transcriptional outputs and DNA repair program.
Authors: Changmeng Cai; Housheng Hansen He; Sen Chen; Ilsa Coleman; Hongyun Wang; Zi Fang; Shaoyong Chen; Peter S Nelson; X Shirley Liu; Myles Brown; Steven P Balk Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Elahe A Mostaghel; Brett T Marck; Stephen R Plymate; Robert L Vessella; Stephen Balk; Alvin M Matsumoto; Peter S Nelson; R Bruce Montgomery Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hung-Ming Lam; Ryan McMullin; Holly M Nguyen; Ilsa Coleman; Michael Gormley; Roman Gulati; Lisha G Brown; Sarah K Holt; Weimin Li; Deborah S Ricci; Karin Verstraeten; Shibu Thomas; Elahe A Mostaghel; Peter S Nelson; Robert L Vessella; Eva Corey Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ye Zhou; Maya Otto-Duessel; Miaoling He; Susan Markel; Tim Synold; Jeremy O Jones Journal: J Mol Endocrinol Date: 2013-06-29 Impact factor: 5.098
Authors: Benjamin A Teply; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rana Sullivan; Irina Rifkind; Ashley Bruns; Avery Spitz; Morgan DeCarli; Victoria Sinibaldi; Caroline F Pratz; Changxue Lu; John L Silberstein; Jun Luo; Michael T Schweizer; Charles G Drake; Michael A Carducci; Channing J Paller; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Mario A Eisenberger; Samuel R Denmeade Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: William R Polkinghorn; Joel S Parker; Man X Lee; Elizabeth M Kass; Daniel E Spratt; Phillip J Iaquinta; Vivek K Arora; Wei-Feng Yen; Ling Cai; Deyou Zheng; Brett S Carver; Yu Chen; Philip A Watson; Neel P Shah; Sho Fujisawa; Alexander G Goglia; Anuradha Gopalan; Haley Hieronymus; John Wongvipat; Peter T Scardino; Michael J Zelefsky; Maria Jasin; Jayanta Chaudhuri; Simon N Powell; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Dong Han; Sujun Chen; Wanting Han; Shuai Gao; Jude N Owiredu; Muqing Li; Steven P Balk; Housheng Hansen He; Changmeng Cai Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Michael D Nyquist; Alexandra Corella; Osama Mohamad; Ilsa Coleman; Arja Kaipainen; Daniel A Kuppers; Jared M Lucas; Patrick J Paddison; Stephen R Plymate; Peter S Nelson; Elahe A Mostaghel Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-10-03
Authors: Xintao Qiu; Lisha G Brown; Jennifer L Conner; Holly M Nguyen; Nadia Boufaied; Sarah Abou Alaiwi; Ji-Heui Seo; Talal El Zarif; Connor Bell; Edward O'Connor; Brian Hanratty; Mark Pomerantz; Matthew L Freedman; Myles Brown; Michael C Haffner; Peter S Nelson; Felix Y Feng; David P Labbé; Henry W Long; Eva Corey Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Michael D Nyquist; Lisa S Ang; Alexandra Corella; Ilsa M Coleman; Michael P Meers; Anthony J Christiani; Cordell Pierce; Derek H Janssens; Hannah E Meade; Arnab Bose; Lauren Brady; Timothy Howard; Navonil De Sarkar; Sander B Frank; Ruth F Dumpit; James T Dalton; Eva Corey; Stephen R Plymate; Michael C Haffner; Elahe A Mostaghel; Peter S Nelson Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Salma Siddiqui; Stephen J Libertini; Christopher A Lucas; Alan P Lombard; Han Bit Baek; Rachel M Nakagawa; Kristine S Nishida; Thomas M Steele; Frank U Melgoza; Alexander D Borowsky; Blythe P Durbin-Johnson; LiHong Qi; Paramita M Ghosh; Maria Mudryj Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 8.679