Samiullah Khan1, Kapil K Chousalkar2. 1. School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, 5371, Australia. 2. School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, 5371, Australia. Kapil.chousalkar@adelaide.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The chicken gut microbiota passes through different stages of maturation; therefore, strengthening it with well characterised probiotics increases its resilience required for optimum gut health and wellbeing. However, there is limited information on the interaction of Bacillus based probiotics with gut microbial community members in cage free laying chickens both in rearing and production phases of life. In the current study, we investigated the changes in the gut microbiome of free range hens in the field after Bacillus based probiotic supplementation. RESULTS: Overall, at phylum level, probiotic supplementation increased the populations of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria mainly at the expense of Firmicutes. The population of Bacteroidetes significantly increased during the production as compared to the rearing phase, and its higher population in the probiotic-supplemented chickens reflects the positive role of Bacillus based probiotic in gut health. Core differences in the beta diversity suggest that probiotic supplementation decreased microbial compositionality. The non-significant difference in alpha diversity between the probiotic and control chickens showed that the composition of community structure did not change. No Salmonella spp. were isolated from the probiotic supplemented birds. Egg internal quality was significantly higher, while egg production and body weight did not differ. Functional prediction data showed that probiotic supplementation enriched metabolic pathways, such as vitamin B6 metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, monobactam biosynthesis, RNA degradation, retinol metabolism, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, phosphonate and phosphinate metabolism, AMPK signaling pathway, cationic antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) resistance and tyrosine metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, age was the main factor affecting the composition and diversity of gut microbiota, where probiotic supplementation improved the abundance of many useful candidates in the gut microbial communities. The generated baseline data in the current study highlights the importance of the continuous use of Bacillus based probiotic for optimum gut health and production.
BACKGROUND: The chicken gut microbiota passes through different stages of maturation; therefore, strengthening it with well characterised probiotics increases its resilience required for optimum gut health and wellbeing. However, there is limited information on the interaction of Bacillus based probiotics with gut microbial community members in cage free laying chickens both in rearing and production phases of life. In the current study, we investigated the changes in the gut microbiome of free range hens in the field after Bacillus based probiotic supplementation. RESULTS: Overall, at phylum level, probiotic supplementation increased the populations of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria mainly at the expense of Firmicutes. The population of Bacteroidetes significantly increased during the production as compared to the rearing phase, and its higher population in the probiotic-supplemented chickens reflects the positive role of Bacillus based probiotic in gut health. Core differences in the beta diversity suggest that probiotic supplementation decreased microbial compositionality. The non-significant difference in alpha diversity between the probiotic and control chickens showed that the composition of community structure did not change. No Salmonella spp. were isolated from the probiotic supplemented birds. Egg internal quality was significantly higher, while egg production and body weight did not differ. Functional prediction data showed that probiotic supplementation enriched metabolic pathways, such as vitamin B6 metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, monobactam biosynthesis, RNA degradation, retinol metabolism, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, phosphonate and phosphinate metabolism, AMPK signaling pathway, cationic antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) resistance and tyrosine metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, age was the main factor affecting the composition and diversity of gut microbiota, where probiotic supplementation improved the abundance of many useful candidates in the gut microbial communities. The generated baseline data in the current study highlights the importance of the continuous use of Bacillus based probiotic for optimum gut health and production.
Authors: Fredrik Bäckhed; Hao Ding; Ting Wang; Lora V Hooper; Gou Young Koh; Andras Nagy; Clay F Semenkovich; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-10-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Steven R Gill; Mihai Pop; Robert T Deboy; Paul B Eckburg; Peter J Turnbaugh; Buck S Samuel; Jeffrey I Gordon; David A Relman; Claire M Fraser-Liggett; Karen E Nelson Journal: Science Date: 2006-06-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Wendy R Russell; Sylvia H Duncan; Lorraine Scobbie; Gary Duncan; Louise Cantlay; A Graham Calder; Susan E Anderson; Harry J Flint Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Simone Becattini; Eric R Littmann; Rebecca A Carter; Sohn G Kim; Sejal M Morjaria; Lilan Ling; Yangtsho Gyaltshen; Emily Fontana; Ying Taur; Ingrid M Leiner; Eric G Pamer Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Christoph Roth; Tanja Sims; Markus Rodehutscord; Jana Seifert; Amélia Camarinha-Silva Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 4.755