Literature DB >> 31226553

An investigation into the relationship between inhomogeneity and wave shapes in phantoms and ex vivo skeletal muscle using Magnetic Resonance Elastography and finite element analysis.

Harish Palnitkar1, Rolf O Reiter2, Shreyan Majumdar2, Phillip Lewis3, Margaret Hammersley3, Ramille N Shah2, Thomas J Royston4, Dieter Klatt2.   

Abstract

Soft biological tissues such as skeletal muscle and brain white matter can be inhomogeneous and anisotropic due to the presence of fibers. Unlike biological tissue, phantoms with known microstructure and defined mechanical properties enable a quantitative assessment and systematic investigation of the influence of inhomogeneities on the nature of shear wave propagation. This study introduces a mathematical measure for the wave shape, which the authors call as the 1-Norm, to determine the conditions under which homogenization may be a valid approach. This is achieved through experimentation using the Magnetic Resonance Elastography technique on 3D printed inhomogeneous fiber phantoms as well as on ex-vivo porcine lumbus muscle. In addition, Finite Element Analysis is used as a tool to decouple the effects of directional anisotropy from those of inhomogeneity. A correlation is then established between the values of 1-Norm derived from the wave front geometry, and the spacing (d) between neighboring inhomogeneities (spherical inclusions or fibers and fiber intersections in phantoms and muscle). Smaller values of 1-Norm indicate less wave scattering at the locations of fiber intersections, which implies that the wave propagation may be approximated to that of a homogeneous medium; homogenization may not be a valid approximation when significant scattering occurs at the locations of inhomogeneities. In conclusion, the current study proposes 1-Norm as a quantitative measure of the magnitude of wave scattering in a medium, which can potentially be used as a homogeneity index of a biological tissue. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1-Norm; Finite element analysis; Homogenization; Inhomogeneity; Magnetic resonance elastography; Wave front analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31226553      PMCID: PMC6698411          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  24 in total

1.  Complex-valued stiffness reconstruction for magnetic resonance elastography by algebraic inversion of the differential equation.

Authors:  T E Oliphant; A Manduca; R L Ehman; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  In vivo waveguide elastography of white matter tracts in the human brain.

Authors:  Anthony Romano; Michael Scheel; Sebastian Hirsch; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Viscoelasticity-based MR elastography of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Dieter Klatt; Sebastian Papazoglou; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M A Dresner; G H Rose; P J Rossman; R Muthupillai; A Manduca; R L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Shear wave group velocity inversion in MR elastography of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Sebastian Papazoglou; Jens Rump; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the lung: technical feasibility.

Authors:  B C Goss; K P McGee; E C Ehman; A Manduca; R L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Dieter Klatt; Uwe Hamhaber; Patrick Asbach; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Using static preload with magnetic resonance elastography to estimate large strain viscoelastic properties of bovine liver.

Authors:  E C Clarke; S Cheng; M Green; R Sinkus; L E Bilston
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  In vivo determination of hepatic stiffness using steady-state free precession magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Dieter Klatt; Patrick Asbach; Jens Rump; Sebastian Papazoglou; Rajan Somasundaram; Jens Modrow; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Characterizing Musculoskeletal Tissue Mechanics Based on Shear Wave Propagation: A Systematic Review of Current Methods and Reported Measurements.

Authors:  Jonathon Blank; Matthew Blomquist; Lesley Arant; Stephanie Cone; Joshua Roth
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Spatial heterogeneity of hepatic fibrosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis vs. viral hepatitis assessed by MR elastography.

Authors:  Rolf Reiter; Mehrgan Shahryari; Heiko Tzschätzsch; Dieter Klatt; Britta Siegmund; Bernd Hamm; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack; Patrick Asbach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Sound transmission in human thorax through airway insonification: an experimental and computational study with diagnostic applications.

Authors:  Harish Palnitkar; Brian M Henry; Zoujun Dai; Ying Peng; Hansen A Mansy; Richard H Sandler; Robert A Balk; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.