Literature DB >> 31225747

Identification of Guide-Intrinsic Determinants of Cas9 Specificity.

Nicholas C Huston1, Josh Tycko1, Eric L Tillotson1, Christopher J Wilson1, Vic E Myer1, Hariharan Jayaram1, Barrett E Steinberg1.   

Abstract

Considerable effort has been devoted to developing a comprehensive understanding of CRISPR nuclease specificity. In silico predictions and multiple genome-wide cellular and biochemical approaches have revealed a basic understanding of the Cas9 specificity profile. However, none of these approaches has delivered a model that allows accurate prediction of a CRISPR nuclease's ability to cleave a site based entirely on the sequence of the guide RNA (gRNA) and the target. We describe a library-based biochemical assay that directly reports the cleavage efficiency of a particular Cas9-guide complex by measuring both uncleaved and cleaved target molecules over a wide range of mismatched library members. We applied our assay using libraries of targets to evaluate the specificity of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 under a variety of experimental conditions. Surprisingly, our data show an unexpectedly high variation in the random gRNA:target DNA mismatch tolerance when cleaving with different gRNAs, indicating guide-intrinsic mismatch permissiveness and challenging the assumption of universal specificity models. We use data generated by our assay to create the first off-target, guide-specific cleavage models. The barcoded libraries of targets approach is rapid, highly modular, and capable of generating protein- and guide-specific models, as well as illuminating the biophysics of Cas9 binding versus cutting. These models may be useful in identifying potential off-targets, and the gRNA-intrinsic nature of mismatch tolerance argues for coupling these specificity models with orthogonal methods for a more complete assessment of gRNA specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31225747      PMCID: PMC6694761          DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CRISPR J        ISSN: 2573-1599


  27 in total

1.  Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells.

Authors:  Daesik Kim; Sangsu Bae; Jeongbin Park; Eunji Kim; Seokjoong Kim; Hye Ryeong Yu; Jinha Hwang; Jong-Il Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  The Conformational Dynamics of Cas9 Governing DNA Cleavage Are Revealed by Single-Molecule FRET.

Authors:  Mengyi Yang; Sijia Peng; Ruirui Sun; Jingdi Lin; Nan Wang; Chunlai Chen
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Mapping the genomic landscape of CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage.

Authors:  Peter Cameron; Chris K Fuller; Paul D Donohoue; Brittnee N Jones; Matthew S Thompson; Matthew M Carter; Scott Gradia; Bastien Vidal; Elizabeth Garner; Euan M Slorach; Elaine Lau; Lynda M Banh; Alexandra M Lied; Leslie S Edwards; Alexander H Settle; Daniel Capurso; Victor Llaca; Stéphane Deschamps; Mark Cigan; Joshua K Young; Andrew P May
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases.

Authors:  Patrick D Hsu; David A Scott; Joshua A Weinstein; F Ann Ran; Silvana Konermann; Vineeta Agarwala; Yinqing Li; Eli J Fine; Xuebing Wu; Ophir Shalem; Thomas J Cradick; Luciano A Marraffini; Gang Bao; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  John G Doench; Nicolo Fusi; Meagan Sullender; Mudra Hegde; Emma W Vaimberg; Jennifer Listgarten; Katherine F Donovan; Ian Smith; Zuzana Tothova; Craig Wilen; Robert Orchard; Herbert W Virgin; David E Root
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Off-target predictions in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing using deep learning.

Authors:  Jiecong Lin; Ka-Chun Wong
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs.

Authors:  Yanfang Fu; Jeffry D Sander; Deepak Reyon; Vincent M Cascio; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9: a smaller Cas9 for all-in-one adeno-associated virus delivery and paired nickase applications.

Authors:  Ari E Friedland; Reshica Baral; Pankhuri Singhal; Katherine Loveluck; Shen Shen; Minerva Sanchez; Eugenio Marco; Gregory M Gotta; Morgan L Maeder; Edward M Kennedy; Anand V R Kornepati; Alexander Sousa; McKensie A Collins; Hari Jayaram; Bryan R Cullen; David Bumcrot
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells.

Authors:  Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Shengdar Q Tsai; Michelle S Prew; Nhu T Nguyen; Moira M Welch; Jose M Lopez; Zachary R McCaw; Martin J Aryee; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  7 in total

1.  CRISPR-Cas12a has widespread off-target and dsDNA-nicking effects.

Authors:  Karthik Murugan; Arun S Seetharam; Andrew J Severin; Dipali G Sashital
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Systematic in vitro specificity profiling reveals nicking defects in natural and engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants.

Authors:  Karthik Murugan; Shravanti K Suresh; Arun S Seetharam; Andrew J Severin; Dipali G Sashital
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA activity depends on free energy changes and on the target PAM context.

Authors:  Giulia I Corsi; Kunli Qu; Ferhat Alkan; Xiaoguang Pan; Yonglun Luo; Jan Gorodkin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 4.  Targeting cancer epigenetics with CRISPR-dCAS9: Principles and prospects.

Authors:  Mohammad Mijanur Rahman; Trygve O Tollefsbol
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 5.  Tools for experimental and computational analyses of off-target editing by programmable nucleases.

Authors:  X Robert Bao; Yidan Pan; Ciaran M Lee; Timothy H Davis; Gang Bao
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Quantification of Cas9 binding and cleavage across diverse guide sequences maps landscapes of target engagement.

Authors:  Evan A Boyle; Winston R Becker; Hua B Bai; Janice S Chen; Jennifer A Doudna; William J Greenleaf
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Systematic decomposition of sequence determinants governing CRISPR/Cas9 specificity.

Authors:  Rongjie Fu; Wei He; Jinzhuang Dou; Oscar D Villarreal; Ella Bedford; Helen Wang; Connie Hou; Liang Zhang; Yalong Wang; Dacheng Ma; Yiwen Chen; Xue Gao; Martin Depken; Han Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.